PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קטו,א גמרא

He disagreed with this Rav Chisda after ??? from him he returns and he makes the blessing upon it except Rav Chisdah said from the beginning he makes the blessing upon it "who creates the fruit of the earth" and on ??? and in the end ??? without blessing in Syria my slave Like Rav Huna and Rav Sheishet the son of of Rav Joshua do as Rav ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? of Rav Chisda Rav Acha the son of of Raba he turned ??? vegetables To exclude ??? Ravina said He said to me: Rav ??? the son of of Rav he gave Thus said Hallel in the name ??? No. ??? together ??? It is because of this: ??? to us ??? in these times (nowadays) a law established by the Torah ??? is a law established by the Rabbis and comes ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? for him ??? a law established by the Torah and even for one for he said: the commandments yes. ??? this one for that one that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי a law established by the Torah ??? or is a law established by the Rabbis ??? but: a law established by the Torah is a law established by the Rabbis will come is a law established by the Rabbis ??? for him ??? Which Tanna taught: ??? the commandments yes. ??? this one for that one Hallel She as it is taught: And they said about Hallel that he was ??? "At the same time," ??? as it is said (Num. 9) on the commandments ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: they divide upon it ??? on Hallel as it is taught: It is possible ??? "At the same time," ??? like the way ??? Therefore, scripture states: on the commandments ??? even this alone by itself and this alone by itself He disagreed with this Rav Ashi If so, What then does it mean when it says even except Rav Ashi said This a Tanna taught: Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: It is possible He has not fulfilled his obligation. in them? the hands of ??? unless it is ??? "At the same time," ??? like the way ??? Therefore, scripture states: on the commandments ??? even this alone by itself and this alone by itself now that is not it was said: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion No. ??? and not ??? he makes the blessing on ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had he makes the blessing on ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? together without blessing in memory of the Holy Temple ??? Rabbi Eliezer said Rav said ??? all ??? It is necessary for him ??? Rav Pappa said: Learn from this This ???

דף קטו,ב גמרא

It is necessary for him ??? It is because of this: ??? For if it was ??? It is not necessary ??? why do I have this one No. ??? and perhaps, In reality lit: In the world I would say to you It is not necessary ??? except why do I have ??? perhaps, ??? for him And Rav Pappa said No. ??? perhaps, ??? for him ??? and in the case of ??? there is not in this case. ??? Rav Chisda ??? he took his hands ??? washes his hands ??? two ??? rabbis in front of Rav ??? this one in reality it was said: For if it was You might have thought Here in this case, it was said: why do I have ??? two times this one ??? for him his hand one ??? He said to them Rav ??? Here in this case, it was said: For if it was ??? in reality it was said: why do I have two ??? Rather, what can we conclude? Here in this case, it was said: ??? two times why do I have this one ??? for him his hand one ??? They said: immediately who seeks to say ??? perhaps, ??? Rabba said: ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? the hands of ??? he has fulfilled his obligation the hands of ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? Even the hands of ??? also He has not fulfilled his obligation. Rav said ??? son of ??? before Each and every one ??? before Each and every one ??? before Each and every one And there is no meaning to the word ??? the table except before who ??? Rav Huna says all of them also before who ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion Like Rav Huna For what reason ??? ??? They said: of the academy of R' ??? so that ??? Abaye it was. ??? in front of Rabbah he saw that he came ??? He said to them ??? No. ??? they came ??? He said to him: Rabbah ??? Just as ??? Shmuel said (in Deut. 16) bread ??? bread ??? upon it items Another teaching is like this: bread ??? bread ??? upon it items in great quantity Another thing: bread ??? Responded it is written Just as Responded ???