PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קכ,א גמרא

in the first, No. No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? in the first, ??? but: ??? perhaps, will come ??? food that is large I would say No. Come and learn from this. Mar Zutra he would say over Thus said Rav Yosef said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said ??? after ??? Let him say That would be a support to him. To whose position? yes. ??? after the Paschal offering ??? after the Paschal offering that is not but: after ??? No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? after ??? that is not ??? his reason but: after Passover I would say No. Come and learn from this. They challenged him from this teaching: ??? a person ??? from them but only ??? an olive's volume ??? yes. in the first, No. No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? in the first, ??? but: ??? food that is large I would say No. ??? Rabba said: ??? in these times (nowadays) a law established by the Torah ??? is a law established by the Rabbis and what is the difference here, ??? As it is written (Num. 9) on the commandments ??? at a time i.e., in a case That there are Passover there are ??? and at a time ??? Passover there is not in this case. ??? also this one it is written on the commandments ??? he returns of him. he read (Ex. 12) in the evening, ??? the commandments and Rav Acha son of Ya'akov he said One of these and one of these is a law established by the Rabbis except it is written in the evening, ??? the commandments this particular should bring himself ??? that he was on the way ??? I thought to say immediately ??? No. ??? also No. ??? Come and learn from this. And Rabba said to you tamei that he was on the way ??? It is not necessary he read that is not ??? son of ??? as it is taught: (Ex. 12) all ??? does not eat in it in it he does not he eats but: he eats ??? And the other one it is written ??? and then it is written ??? and It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. This teaching is consistent with the position of Raba (in Deut. 16) ??? days It may be eaten the commandments by day ??? to Hashem ??? Just as ??? is a voluntary act Even ??? days is a voluntary act What is the reason? you shall a thing that he was are in the general category and went out from the general group to teach No. to teach on himself he has fulfilled his obligation except to teach on the general group all of it he has fulfilled his obligation It is possible Even the first night is a voluntary act Therefore, scripture states: on the commandments ??? yes. for me except at a time i.e., in a case ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived at a time i.e., in a case that do not the house of ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived from where do we learn Scripture states: in the evening, ??? the scripture ??? guilt-obligation

דף קכ,א משנה

??? all of them No. ???

דף קכ,ב משנה

Rabbi Yosei says: ??? No. ??? the Paschal offering after ??? become tamei ??? impart tumah ???

דף קכ,ב גמרא

R' Yosei says ??? No. ??? How so? How should we understand this? ??? Rav Ashi said ??? and not ??? and not ??? For example, ??? for him and Responded and not know ??? reason out the logic. And so ??? for him ??? Abaye it was. ??? in front of Rabbah he saw that he came ??? He said to him ??? Master, He said to him ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: ??? No. ??? the Paschal offering after ??? become tamei ??? Perhaps, ??? notar Which Tanna taught: Rav Yosef said ??? son of ??? he as it is taught: (Ex. 12) and he ate the flesh by night ??? son of ??? says it is said here, by night ??? and it is said there (Ex. 12) ??? in the land." Egypt" by night ??? Just as there until midnight Even here, until midnight He said to him: Rabbi Akiva Is it not the case that it is said ??? until ??? If so, Just as Scripture states: by night It is possible ??? is eaten ??? by day Scripture states: by night by night he is eaten and is not eaten by day and Rabbi Akiva This ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself ??? night after he who has arrived ??? I thought to say Because Passover simple offerings and peace-offerings simple offerings Just as peace-offerings ??? for two days and one night Even Passover ??? nights. in a place days ??? is eaten for two nights. and one day Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? son of ??? He could say to you (Ex. 12) fill ??? until mornings ??? this one and Rabbi Akiva He could say to you If it was it is not written: the Merciful One ??? then I might incorrectly say: What then does it mean when it says mornings mornings two ??? He could say to you all in a case ??? mornings mornings ??? he Rabba said: he ate ??? in these times (nowadays) after ??? son of ??? he has not fulfilled his obligation. Lit., he has not caused his obligation to go out from his hands. This is obvious! ??? he is equivalent. What would you have said? this one ??? he read ??? Come and hear from this. and so when ??? he read ??? the first ??? Pigul ??? become tamei ??? Rav Huna and Rav Chisda One says It is because of this: ??? the priesthood and one says It is because of this: ??? the priesthood One says an olive's volume and one says an egg's volume