PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יד,א גמרא

two ??? they were ??? The whole time ??? all the nation they eat ??? One from them ??? No. they eat and not ??? all the nation ???

דף יד,א משנה

Rabbi ??? viceroy the priests. says ??? of priests No. ??? the flesh that became tamei, ??? with ??? that became tamei, ??? despite the fact ??? on ??? R' ??? and he said ??? of priests No. ??? the oil ??? in the case of a tevul yom one who has already immersed in a mikveh but remains tamei until nightfall ??? that became tamei, ??? did he die even though ??? on ??? he said Rabbi Meir ??? we have learned ??? terumah that is tahor with ??? on Passover R' Yosi said It is not She ??? "We thank..." R' Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua ??? -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to ??? on Just as ??? on ??? and on ??? Eliezer says ??? -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to ??? and R' Yehoshua says ??? as one

דף יד,א גמרא

??? meat that became tamei, ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall two For ??? for him ??? meat that became tamei, ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall two two and a second person he What then does it mean when it says ??? to him ??? on ??? that it is possible Rav Yehudah said Here in this case, ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) that there is for him the third but his thought is the third is permitted. ??? two Hey, isn't it the case that yes. he eats become tamei he eats as it is taught: It is possible ??? he eats become tamei he eats Scripture states: (Lev. 11) And so He shall give" water on seed and it fell ??? upon it tamei he he tamei And there is no meaning to the word makes one like it; tamei This is satistfactory ??? for he said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: from terumah and holy offerings makes one like it; and according to Rav Adda bar Ahavah, in the name of Raba also for he said: They did not teach such a ruling except Those who are ill and terumah but: ??? makes is subject to the same laws as them ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except ??? in the name of Raba for he said: the written Torah fill ??? the scripture there is no difference Those who are ill there is no difference terumah there is no difference holy offerings he does not makes one like it; What is there to say? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? That there are ??? meat that he came ??? If so, This with ??? that became tamei, ??? with ??? should bring himself except ??? he eats become tamei he eats according to Torah law, According to Rabbinic law, ??? R' ??? of priests No. ??? oil ??? in the case of a tevul yom one who has already immersed in a mikveh but remains tamei until nightfall What then does it mean when it says you shall the third And so ??? for him ??? that became tamei, ??? did he die What then does it mean when it says you shall two And what can we come and learn from this? the third is permitted. ??? two we were ??? Rav Yehudah said Here in this case, ??? of ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? he said

דף יד,ב גמרא

(Num. 19) ??? Behold! he ??? for him ??? but his thought is the third is permitted. ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? of Rav Yehudah ??? of ??? of pottery And what does it mean when it says ??? For this there i.e., in another mishna tamei and tamei And even Here in this case, is invalid, and tamei Rabba said: Our mishna ??? What is the purpose of teaching: lamp that became tamei, ??? did he die ??? that became tamei, ??? except Who is a thing ??? between ??? did he die ??? you shall says this ??? Rabba said: Learn from this his reasoning is Rabbi Akiva ??? others a law established by the Torah For if it was ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? This lamp What then does it mean when it says ??? for this oil If it was ??? this one ??? and he arises From where can you derive perhaps, ??? others According to Rabbinic law, If it was According to Rabbinic law, why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? even ??? and a second person also at first you shall For it was taught in a baraita all ??? ??? become tamei ??? to be at first except ??? day except Learn from this a law established by the Torah ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? we have learned ??? Shall I say in words of R' Chaninah viceroy the priests. who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna tamei and tamei Here in this case, tahor and tamei So rather, in words of Rabbi Akiva who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna is invalid, and tamei Here in this case, tahor and tamei Let him say his reasoning is Rabbi Meir Our mishna ??? a law established by the Torah ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? tahor ???