PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כ,א גמרא

??? upon it even in a vessel ??? atop ??? in which there is in it the understanding of ??? tamei This meat ??? in what way If you were to say ??? with blood Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said from where do we learn ??? holy offerings that is not considers it proper as it is said (Deut. 12) No. ??? on the land ??? blood ??? considers it proper but when it is not ??? he does not considers it proper So rather, ??? the house of ??? Hey, isn't it the case that R' Yosi said the son of Rabbi Chanina ??? the house of ??? No. ??? that are ??? except that do not validate it So rather, ??? for him ??? of him. ??? and a second person also ??? who seeks ??? of menuchot offerings: ??? in it ??? and a second person or did not say Rav Yehudah Shmuel said For example, ??? a cow of ??? peace-offerings and the transgression. ??? and it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? upon it ??? "when he expounds" clearly The entirety tahor ??? Rav Adda bar Ahava said "when he expounds" clearly ??? Rav Ashi said: Even if you say "when he expounds" clearly ??? It is because of this: that there is ??? It was taught by a Tanna taught: in front of Rav ??? become tamei ??? impart tumah ??? and implements of become tamei ??? impart tumah ??? and we have learned three ??? Behold! four there are. ??? that at the beginning of the teaching ??? No. ??? a Tanna taught: for he said: ??? impart tumah implements of except Rabbi Yehudah and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had of him. ??? It was taught there: ??? the bread ??? the second because of ??? at first He said to him: Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? to Raba ??? for this an oven like who ??? he is equivalent. ??? This bread the first He said to him: No. You might have thought as it is taught: It is possible ??? all the vessels impart tumah ??? implements of pottery

דף כ,ב גמרא

Scripture states: (Lev. 11) all who in its midst ??? and right next lit: and leaning for him from all One who eats he eats become tamei ??? implements of pottery And there is no meaning to the word all the vessels impart tumah ??? implements of ??? Rav Chisda pointed out a contradiction. ??? who R' Yehoshua said: ??? as one They challenged this from a baraita: R' Yosi said yes. ??? on Just as ??? if on ??? that became tamei, ??? that specific with ??? that became tamei, ??? this tamei and this tamei if on the oil ??? in the case of a tevul yom one who has already immersed in a mikveh but remains tamei until nightfall ??? that specific ??? that became tamei, ??? did he die this is invalid, and this tamei Even do we "We thank..." from terumah Watch out for leading vav And that which became tamei, ??? it with ??? Watch out for leading vav And that which became tamei, ??? but: how ??? even that is hanging with ??? lest ??? Elijah ??? this one Rabbi Shimon and who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yehoshua this one R' Yosi and who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yehoshua as it is taught: ??? that falls to be on Shabbat ??? The entirety before Me the Sabbath ??? These are the words of R' Meir R' Yosei says that is tahor in its own right and that is hanging in its own right and that is tamei in its own right he said Rabbi Shimon No. ??? R' Eliezer and R' Yehoshua on ??? and on ??? that do not ??? on ??? and on ??? on Just as ??? on ??? and on ??? Eliezer says ??? -- this refers to on herself -- this refers to on herself and R' Yehoshua says ??? as one Hey, isn't it the case that Our mishna it was R' Yosi thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: R' Yosi to R' ??? even Rabbi Shimon and who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yehoshua ??? For ??? and that is tamei but: ??? and that is tamei No. Rabbi Yosei the son of Rabbi Chanina pointed out a contradiction. terumah ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? R' Yehoshua ??? as one They challenged this from a baraita: ??? of terumah ??? of it doubt whether ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: if it was ??? in a place ??? in a place ??? and if it was it is revealed ??? Rabbi Yehoshua ??? if it was ??? in a place ??? in a place ??? and if it was it is covered ??? the tooth yes. ??? No. ??? this one Rabbi Shimon who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yehoshua this one R' Yosi who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yehoshua R' Elazar pointed out a contradiction. terumah ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? R' Yehoshua the tooth yes. ??? No. They challenged this from a baraita: ??? of terumah ??? the upper one underneath it Those who are ill ??? give thanks R' Eliezer ??? Joshua ??? It is possible ??? from it ??? And if not, R' Eliezer says: ??? and do not ??? in the hand of R' Yehoshua says ??? in the hand of ??? It is different there in that case That there are ??? Those who are ill He disagreed with this Raba ??? also that it is possible ??? pieces of wood He said to him Abaye ??? is greater than ??? No. ??? is greater than ??? No. ??? as it is taught: ??? of oil terumah ??? the upper one ??? Those who are ill ??? give thanks R' Eliezer to R' Joshua ??? It is possible ??? from it ??? And if not, ??? and do not ??? in the hand of What is the difference oil ??? wine also ??? And if you would say ??? Is this not the validity She For didn't Shmuel say It is because of this: R' Chiyya they drink ??? in two, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? will come of him. to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? oil also will come of him. to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? for him in a vessel ??? wine also in a vessel pointed out a contradition to him ??? he is required for him in a vessel ??? ??? pointed out a contradition to him herself ??? She as it is taught: ??? of wine of terumah Watch out for leading vav And that which became tamei, the academy of Shammai say ??? but the academy of Hillel say: shall you do ??? he said Rabbi Yishmael the son of Rabbi Yosi I ??? in the field ??? in the house of shall you do ??? that it is possible that they said ??? shall you do ??? They said to him: