PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כב,א גמרא

that specific you ??? and if you ??? all ??? and R' Meir that specific you ??? and if you ??? Those who are ill ??? in the courtyard And the other one Those who are ill ??? in the courtyard Is this not a law established by the Torah She He challenged this "He" meaning... Rabbi Isaac ??? Consider this case: ??? he said (Gen. 32) because of this No. ??? the Children of Israel ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: ??? a person ??? to a gentile ??? in its midst because of ??? his reasoning is R' Abahu ??? roadkill She ??? This is satistfactory for one for he said: there are ??? except for one for he said: yes. ??? What is there to say? one ??? for him for he said: yes. ??? Rabbi Shimon as it is taught: One who eats ??? of livestock that is tamei Rabbi Yehudah he is obligated two and Rabbi Shimon exempts Rabbi Shimon Here, too, ??? to benefit from it as it is taught: ??? is permitted. to benefit from it these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. and Rabbi Shimon ??? Consider this case: blood ??? he said (Lev. 16) all ??? from among you It may not be eaten blood and we have learnt in a Mishna: both these and these: ??? ??? the offering is subject to the laws of misappropriation. that I blood ??? As it is written (Deut. 12) No. ??? on the land ??? Just as water are permitted Even blood is permitted. and so go ahead and say ??? atop the altar of he said Rabbi Abahu ??? most of water something most of water it is written except Rav Ashi said ??? and not ??? and so go ahead and say ??? before idolatry there i.e., in another mishna also ??? As it is written (Deut. 32) ??? wine ???

דף כב,ב גמרא

??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? blood ??? Chiyya son of Abba for he said: R' Chiyya bar Abba that R' Yochanan said from where do we learn ??? holy offerings that is not considers it proper as it is said (Deut. 12) No. ??? on the land ??? blood ??? considers it proper that is not ??? he does not considers it proper Consider this case: ??? from ??? As it is written (Deut. 12) It may not be eaten ??? with ??? and it was taught: Rabbi Natan says from where do we learn that did not have ??? a person a cup wine ??? from ??? to the children of ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 19) and before ??? No. ??? this one for dogs Sarai that I ??? from ??? As it is written (Deut. 12) He spat ??? he ate the blood For the blood he ??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? from ??? He could say to you blood he ??? from ??? Just as ??? from ??? is forbidden Even blood from ??? is forbidden and if this this blood ??? in it Consider this case: ox ??? he said (Ex. 21) does not eat ??? and it was taught: ??? as it is said (Ex. 21) ??? the ox Really? know that it ??? forbidden in cases regarding eating for just as Therefore, scripture states: does not eat ??? to you the scripture ??? after ??? is forbidden yes. for me except in cases regarding eating to benefit from it from where do we learn Scripture states: (Ex. 21) and the master of the ox ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? Shimon ben Zoma says like a person ??? to his fellow he has fulfilled his obligation so-and-so ??? And he does not have at them." benefit of anything The reason is ??? and the master of the ox ??? For if it was fill shall eat prohibits food ??? prohibits benefit No. ??? In reality lit: In the world does not eat prohibits food prohibits benefit ??? and the master of the ox ??? its skin he who has arrived and It is necessary to teach this ??? I thought to say does not eat ??? it is written ??? yes. its skin No. Come and learn from this. ??? for him on this verse ??? other than this ??? its skin ??? them ??? them ??? ??? And the other one No. he expounds. As it is taught: Shimon ??? And there are those who say it was ??? he was ??? all ??? immediately arrived (Deut. 10) ??? Hashem your God ??? His students said to him: Rabbi all ??? Just as shall be about them He said to them: in the same way ??? the reward for on ??? thus in the same way I he accepts the reward for on ??? until Rabbi Akiva came ??? Hashem your God ??? scholars Consider this case: orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? he said (Lev. 19) ??? does not eat and it was taught: ??? does not eat yes. for me except prohibits food from where do we learn that did not have ??? from him that did not have ??? in it and not ??? in it the lamp Therefore, scripture states: ??? does not eat ??? all of them The reason is ??? the Merciful One ??? this one Is this not thus then I might incorrectly say: prohibits food ??? prohibits benefit No. ??? In reality lit: In the world does not eat ??? between prohibits food between prohibits benefit and It is different there in that case As it is written to you and It was necessary to provide both opinions You might have thought that I would say that Because "and the writing of to you ??? Come and hear from this. So rather, now ??? to you why do I have to account for that which was taught to you ??? ???