PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כג,א גמרא

to the public Rabbi Yehudah says to discharge the mitzvah ??? to the public What is the reason? ??? that came first As it is written ??? to the public No. ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: to you ??? ??? to the public And Rabbi Yehudah ??? between to the public between ??? to you between an individual between many ??? you shall ??? after ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? after ??? except ??? Consider this case: terumah ??? he said (Lev. 22) and all ??? does not eat and that which was sanctified for Temple use and we have learnt in a Mishna: we make an eruv ??? to Israel from terumah Rav Pappa said: It is different there in that case For scripture said: (in Numbers 18) ??? shall be And the other one ??? Israel he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Consider this case: a Nazir ??? he said (Num. 6) ??? and until ??? does not eat and we have learnt in a Mishna: we make an eruv ??? Mar Zutra said: It is different there in that case For scripture said: ??? are his ??? Rav Ashi said: (Num. 6) and that which was sanctified for Temple use it shall be greatness ??? the gate his head ??? And there is no meaning to the word Another thing: ??? something And there is no meaning to the word Another thing: it is written except ??? Consider this case: new ??? he said (Lev. 23) bread ??? No. ??? until ??? the day ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: reaping ??? and one may feed to a domesticated animal Rav said It is different there in that case heard him For scripture said: ??? And the other one ??? Israel ??? Consider this case: ??? he said (Lev. 11) ??? he does not eat and we have learnt in a Mishna: ??? raw lit., living ??? and fish ??? to them sectarians. ??? are permitted ??? It is different there in that case For scripture said: to you ??? If so, Even if in the case where he did it initially, also, that I Here in this case, For scripture said: ??? why do I have ??? does not eat ??? to you ??? No. let the Merciful One write in the Torah does not eat and it does not require to you He could say to you ??? The reason is ??? also from here Consider this case: chametz ??? he said does not eat chametz and it was taught: R' Yosi the Gallilean says he was astonished on ??? how chametz is forbidden to benefit from it all seven It is different there in that case For scripture said: (Lev. 13) and You shall not see sourdough ??? And the rabbbis ??? If it was you one who sees but: you one who sees of others and of that is high And the other one two to you are written And the other one one ??? and one ??? that did not have ??? And the other one three to you are written And the other one one ??? and one ??? and It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. Let us say, ??? (Lev. 7) may he do it? for all work Just as Scripture states: for all work that it is possible ??? that is high ??? is permitted. ??? is forbidden Therefore, scripture states: for all work these are the words of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean Rabbi Akiva says: that it is possible ??? tahor ??? that is high ??? tamei Therefore, scripture states: for all work and Rabbi Yosei, the Gallilean ??? and to taharah, No. It is necessary to teach this he read For It is necessary to teach this he read ??? and Rabbi Akiva prohibits and permission It is not necessary he read For It is necessary to teach this he read ??? and to taharah,

דף כג,ב גמרא

Is this not In this case, what they disagree about of R' Yosi the Gallilean reasoned No. ??? between prohibits food between prohibits benefit And so he came he read ??? to benefit from it he who has arrived and Rabbi Akiva reasoned prohibits food ??? prohibits benefit No. ??? And so he came he read ??? No. ??? No. ??? between prohibits food between prohibits benefit and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean reasoned ??? roadkill She ??? No. ??? And so It is necessary to teach this he read ??? benefit he who has arrived and Rabbi Akiva reasoned ??? roadkill ??? also ??? And so It is necessary to teach this he read ??? and R' Yosi the Gallilean ??? milk ??? the Merciful One to benefit from it except ??? Let him say ??? If you wish, I would say Here, too, ??? If you wish, I would say ??? to it ??? for just as milk ??? he is spiritually cut off is permitted. to benefit from it ??? that is not ??? he is spiritually cut off is it not all the more so? and Rabbi Shimon ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? next to raw lit., living shall you say ??? that did not have ??? next to raw lit., living And the other one ??? we say it. ??? Regardless, No. ??? all Behold! ??? and Rabbi Abahu in what way ??? on Passover and who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? ??? The entirety ??? he departs for him fill shall eat and Rabbi Abahu he departs for him ??? between for Master or whether for Master are forbidden to benefit from it What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: Those who are ill ??? in the courtyard ??? reasoned does not eat ??? Behold! that specific ??? Those who are ill ??? in the courtyard Rabbi Abahu reasoned that specific ??? Behold! Those who are ill ??? in the courtyard Is this not a law established by the Torah ??? one of the rabbis in front of Rabbi Shmuel son of Nachmeni ??? and he said in the name of R' Yehoshua son of Levi from where do we learn for all ??? and so when in what way does ??? in cases regarding eating Here, too, are forbidden to benefit from it And what does it mean when it says ??? chametz on Passover ??? from where do we learn Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him fill shall eat does not eat prohibits food ??? for him prohibits benefit No. ??? for him Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him ??? derive it like R' Yehudah for he said: items ??? If it was derive it like R' Yehudah Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him ??? for him according to R' Yehudah (Ex. 22) ??? that specific his reasoning is Those who are ill ??? in the courtyard a law established by the Torah from where do we learn As it is written (Lev. 6) all A sin-offering who ??? etc. that do not Scripture states: in fire ??? for just as Scripture states: in fire ??? if he does not one topic ??? As it is written (Lev. 10) and behold ??? one topic for all ???