PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כד,א גמרא

and if he does not one topic as regard to eating, ??? one topic ??? benefit If it was Just as here, ??? Even all ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 6) ??? in fire ??? And there is no meaning to the word all ??? and that one ??? in fire ??? he who has arrived This should bring himself ??? Shimon as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon says: ??? in fire ??? on A sin-offering ??? it ??? And there is no meaning to the word for me except -- this refers to only. invalid as regarding The holiest of holy offerings ??? simple offerings from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: ??? in fire ??? He said to him: Rabbi ??? he read he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: to it (Ex. 29) and if -- more ??? and from ??? until the morning etc. that do not Therefore, scripture states: does not eat for just as Therefore, scripture states: does not eat if he does not one topic ??? for it is the case that it is written (Ex. 29) ??? ??? in fire ??? one topic ??? and if he does not one topic as regard to eating, ??? one topic ??? benefit If it was Just as here, ??? Even all ??? Scripture states: ??? ??? notar ??? And there is no meaning to the word all ??? and that one does not eat ??? he who has arrived This should bring himself ??? for he said: R' Elazar does not eat For and that which was sanctified for Temple use he all ??? is invalid, came the scripture to give No. shall you do on ??? Abayye said: In reality lit: In the world the written Torah that came first ??? in fire ??? and it does not require It may not be eaten Just as Therefore, scripture states: It may not be eaten if he does not one topic ??? for him from that of Rabbi ??? one topic for all ??? and if he does not one topic as regard to eating, ??? one topic ??? benefit If it was Just as here, ??? Even all ??? Scripture states: ??? And there is no meaning to the word all ??? He said to him: Rav ??? and so go ahead and say ??? for him Is this not ??? he who has arrived For if it was from that of Rabbi ??? yes. ??? on Is this not ??? except Rav Pappa said: from here (Lev. 7) ??? who ??? in all tamei does not eat in fire ??? that do not Therefore, scripture states: does not eat Just as Therefore, scripture states: does not eat if he does not one topic ??? for it is the case that ??? for him by a "kal vachomer" ??? for just as tithe ??? he said Torah (Deut. 26) No. ??? from him ??? meat and that which was sanctified for Temple use a donkey is it not all the more so? And if you say yes. ??? from justice. ??? it is written: (Deut. 12) No. ??? to eat ??? tithe ??? etc. Just as Therefore, scripture states: does not eat if he does not one topic ??? one topic for all ??? and if he does not one topic as regard to eating, ??? one topic ??? If it was Just as here, ??? Even all ??? Scripture states: ??? And there is no meaning to the word all ??? he said ??? Ravina to Rav Ashi and so go ahead and say to cross over upon it with two ??? Is this not Watch out for leading vav And who said it? Abaye he ate ??? four ???

דף כד,ב גמרא

??? He said to him all in a case That there are Watch out for leading vav !! but for midrash, ??? and not ??? (Lev. 7) ??? who ??? in all tamei does not eat ??? why do I have ??? pieces of wood frankincense ??? all tahor shall eat meat ??? why do I have ??? from there ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 7) ??? who It may be eaten meat An altar of ??? who to Hashem ??? ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, ??? meat ??? R' Abahu said that R' Yochanan said all ??? yes. ??? about them except a way ??? What then does it mean when it says Rav said ??? son of ??? he ate milk ??? that it is possible that they said R' Abahu said R' Yochanan said: all ??? yes. ??? about them except a way ??? What then does it mean when it says Rav said ??? son of ??? milk of ox ??? atop ??? that he was is exempt and all the more so he eats milk ??? that he was is exempt was it said; also Rav Acha said son of ??? Rav Assi said: that R' Yochanan said ??? milk of ox ??? atop ??? is exempt on account of for all of ??? yes. ??? upon them except a way ??? R' Zeira said Even We also ??? yes. ??? ??? It is because of this: orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree except on that is coming out from ??? and from ??? only. And even ??? figs and pomegranates No. What is the reason? Is this not ??? that is not ??? them a way ??? Abaye said to him: This is satisfactory If it was we had heard ??? Back to the main body of the text: that is not ??? for him a way ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except Here in this case, It is because of this: ??? in reality he Abayye said: Everyone acknowledges ??? the vineyard ??? about them even that did not have like the way ??? What is the reason? It is because of this: that is not it is written in them? food They challenged him from this teaching: ??? son of Yehudah says from where do we learn ??? that he was is forbidden it is said here, (Deut. 14) For with ??? you and it is said there (Ex. 22) and the men of and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? for me Just as there is forbidden Even here, is forbidden And there is no meaning to the word for me except in cases regarding eating to benefit from it from where do we learn is what you say? Do you really mean that? is a kal vachomer for just as orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree that did not have ??? of it transgression forbidden to benefit from it meat ??? in it transgression is it not logical that it should be is forbidden to benefit from it