PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כה,א גמרא

Just as ??? which provides No. it was to it ??? shall you say in the case of the flesh. ??? to him ??? chametz on Passover He corrects that he was to him ??? is forbidden to benefit from it Just as ??? on Passover which provides ??? he is spiritually cut off shall you say in the case of the flesh. ??? that is not ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? the vineyard ??? that do not ??? he is spiritually cut off is forbidden to benefit from it and if ??? Just as ??? the vineyard which provides ??? about them even that did not have like the way ??? and Abaye shall you say in what way shall you say in the case of the flesh. ??? that do not ??? upon it except a way ??? because in the case of the flesh. ??? food "writing" of him. And the other one that he came ??? to it reasoned ??? Just as roadkill a way ??? Even meat ??? a way ??? and Abaye ??? it is not written: food ??? to say ??? upon it Even if that did not have like the way ??? Just as ??? the vineyard which provides No. it was to him ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? son of love This one says ??? the vineyard ??? Because it was to them ??? before ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? heard him if ??? two hundred is forbidden ??? yes. No. ??? did not say Raba two ??? are written it is written (Deut. 22) ??? and then it is written ??? How so? ??? came ??? yes. No. ??? No. Thus said Rabbi Ya'akov that R' Yochanan said in all we accept except ??? an Ashera How so? If you were to say That there are danger even ??? an Ashera also and if ??? danger even all ??? also No. In reality lit: In the world That there are danger And even if thus ??? an Ashera No. as it is taught: R' Eliezer says: if it is said (Deut. 6) in all your soul why is it said in all ??? and if it is said in all ??? why is it said in all your soul except to say to you if there are a person ??? upon it ??? it is said in all your soul and there are a person ??? upon it ??? it is said in all ??? For he came ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: in all we accept except ???

דף כה,ב גמרא

??? idolatry this one of which we were speaking? ??? as it is taught: R' says (Deut. 22) For as it was ??? a man on his neighbor ??? thus ??? And so What is the connection between ??? next to ??? Behold! this came to teach and it is found teach There is an analogy between ??? Just as ??? Even ??? Just as ??? and do not Even passes over ??? and do not ??? From where do we derive this? reason out the logic. he For This certain individual who has arrived in front of Raba He said to him ??? He said to me: ??? killed him ??? and if No. ??? to you He said to him ??? and not ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? applied to you ??? perhaps, the blood ??? a person ??? Master, son of Rav Ashi he found ??? to it ??? He said to him: ??? rabbis in the hour of ??? that did not have in the hour of ??? who say He said to him: This ??? also ??? is comparable that it is possible that they said He said to him: something a way benefit ??? it was said: benefit ??? to a person the master of ??? Abaye said it is permitted. And Rabba said forbidden ??? No. ??? the whole world does not disagree ??? No. ??? and not ??? the whole world does not disagree who permits Because specifically, where they disagree is this: where it is possible and not ??? and According to the opinion of R' Yehudah for he said: a thing that do not ??? is forbidden the whole world does not disagree ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: According to R' Shimon for he said: a thing that do not ??? is permitted. Abaye like Rabbi Shimon And Rabba said Up to this point, No. ??? Thus said Rabbi Shimon except in a case where it is not possible but: in a case where it is possible No. that it is possible that they said ??? and not ??? we were ??? with R' Yehudah and R' Shimon No. ??? and not ??? the whole world does not disagree who permits Because specifically, where they disagree is this: where it is not possible ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? For R' Shimon ??? according to concentration and intent. the whole world does not disagree ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: According to the opinion of R' Yehudah for he said: there is no difference ??? and there is no difference that do not ??? is forbidden Abaye like Rabbi Yehudah