PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כז,א גמרא

until that it should be in it so that ??? And Abaye said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? ??? but not Watch out for leading vav !! ??? ??? ??? is forbidden Perhaps, both this and this ??? is forbidden And from where do you derive ??? of Rabbi Eliezer ??? perhaps, The reason is of Rabbi Eliezer It is because of this: ??? the last I came there is no difference Watch out for leading vav !! ??? ??? ??? there is no difference No. Watch out for leading vav !! ??? ??? ??? but: "At the same time," So, here, who permits except R' Eliezer ??? an Ashera For it was taught in a baraita he took ??? pieces of wood are forbidden to benefit from it He lit of them the oven new he shall overturn it sleeping he shall let it cool he baked in it the bread are forbidden to benefit from it it was combined with others ??? with others all of them are forbidden to benefit from it Rabbi Eliezer says: he shall carry benefit to the Sea of Salt said ??? to him yes. redemption ??? for him to R' Eliezer ??? in the remainder of ??? who ??? for him But rather, if so, ??? And furthermore, This was taught clearly and explicitly and thus he was R' Eliezer ??? in all ??? Abayye said: if ??? to say both this and this ??? is forbidden Rabbi we were R' Eliezer and if you seek to say both this and this ??? is permitted. and here in this other case, It is because of this: ??? praise pieces of wood ??? he Behold! ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? both this and this ??? is forbidden is forbidden for one for he said: both this and this ??? is permitted. Sarai that it is possible that they said even ??? both this and this ??? is permitted. ??? forbidden for it is the case that ??? pieces of wood ??? Thus said Rabbi Joseph R' Yehudah said: Shmuel said an oven ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree or ??? of ??? the vineyard new he shall overturn it sleeping he shall let it cool he baked in it the bread Rabbi says the bread it is permitted. But the sages say: the bread forbidden For it was taught: ??? Shmuel ??? It was taught by And if you wish, I could say in reality his reasoning is Shmuel The halacha is like Rabbi from his fellow and not ??? In this case, Even if ??? reasoned ??? so that thus it will be ??? rabbis ??? atop ??? the words of all are the bread ??? said Rav Yehudah Shmuel said and R' Chiyya son of ??? that R' Yochanan said One says They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: ??? are forbidden and one says even ??? also are permitted This is satisfactory ??? are forbidden It is because of this: ??? praise pieces of wood ??? except ??? even ??? are permitted bread ??? praise pieces of wood ??? to Rabbi in what way does ??? for him Thus said Rabbi ??? opposite him

דף כז,ב גמרא

from this general principle it would follow is a law established by the Rabbis ??? upon it ??? Even if ??? opposite him except pieces of wood ??? According to the sages, in what way does ??? them Rav Ami said son of Chama ??? pointed out a contradiction. brought this very question son of Chama ??? an oven ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use and he baked in it the bread According to the sages, ??? What then does it mean when it says He said to him the bread forbidden for just as between -- this refers to ??? Rabba said: thus now orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use even in a case where there are one thousand No. ??? except Rabba said: If it was has a problem this one it is a problem Is it not the case that from by ??? and all in a case ??? them ??? Rav Pappa said: Here in this case, ??? peace-offerings is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) and who follow the reasoning ??? For R' ??? for he said: that which was sanctified for Temple use in error ??? with intent he does not ??? with intent What is the reason? No. immediately ??? son of the laws of misappropriation of sacred things he No. he departs ??? peace-offerings also immediately ??? son of the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? No. ??? and all in a case ??? and this was taught! all ??? is permitted. except ??? an Ashera ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use In reality lit: In the world is forbidden he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama For example, ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? a person ??? Rav ??? he said ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 6) was his name ??? was his name all of it was his name that did not have ??? R' Yehuda says: yes. burning ??? It was taught: R' Yehudah said: yes. destruction of chametz except burning and justice. he gives for just as notar that is not ??? He will see ??? he shall find required burning chametz ??? He will see ??? he shall find is it not all the more so? ??? burning They said to him: all judgement that you ??? is it not logical Watch out for leading vav !! and did not find pieces of wood ??? who dwells and nullify and the Torah he said (Ex. 12) ??? sourdough ??? in all a thing that you It is possible ??? R' Yehudah had a vision ??? judgement after notar is forbidden in cases regarding eating and chametz is forbidden in cases regarding eating Just as notar ??? Even chametz ??? They said to him: roadkill ??? in cases regarding eating It is not require burning He said to them: ??? notar is forbidden in cases regarding eating to benefit from it and chametz is forbidden in cases regarding eating to benefit from it Just as notar required burning Even chametz required burning They said to him: ox ??? He corrects that he is forbidden in cases regarding eating to benefit from it and does not required burning He said to them: ??? notar is forbidden in cases regarding eating to benefit from it ??? he is spiritually cut off and chametz is forbidden in cases regarding eating to benefit from it ??? he is spiritually cut off Just as notar ??? Even chametz ??? They said to him: ??? of ox ??? He corrects that he is forbidden in cases regarding eating to benefit from it ??? he is spiritually cut off And there is no meaning to the word required burning