PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לא,א גמרא

and comes ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? any more ??? ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? and he made kiddush ??? Abaye said at the end of eating, before they leave he ??? immediately ??? and not ??? the validity at the end of eating, before they leave originally ??? it was. he arises then the ruling is acceptable. ??? then the ruling is acceptable. ??? And Rabba said from here ??? he ??? immediately For this are they, for him ??? it was. ??? them ??? And who said it? Raba thus For didn't pointed out a contradiction. say son of Chama Reuben? ??? field ??? upon it ??? did he die Reuben? and he came the master of obligation ??? for him ??? and he came Shimon ??? judgement he ??? My son, Reuben? and there are those who say ??? We ??? obligation No. ??? Rabba said: If it was ??? Shimon ??? them the land and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had regarding to it ??? for he said: Rav ??? the master of obligation he returns ??? it from them If you say, This is satisfactory at the end of eating, before they leave he ??? he returns ??? it from them ??? he is equivalent. except If you say, from here ??? he ??? why is it that he returns ??? it from them this one you shall like who ??? he is equivalent. And even ??? does anyone lit., who comes to ??? obligation It is different there in that case for he said: them so that thus it will be ??? for him ??? also ??? obligation ??? he gave as it is taught: Rabbi Natan says from where do we learn ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars and his fellow ??? that it shall bring forth from this ??? to this Therefore, scripture states: (Num. 5) and gave ??? a guilt-offering to him We have learnt in a Mishna: a stranger i.e., a non-Jew who lent Israel on his chametz after the Paschal offering is permitted. to benefit from it If you say, This is satisfactory at the end of eating, before they leave he ??? is permitted. to benefit from it except If you say, from here ??? he ??? why is it that is permitted. to benefit from it ??? of Israel it was. he arises Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? opposite him. Let us say, ??? Israel who lent to a gentile on his chametz after the Paschal offering he does not transgresses It is because of this: Rabbi Meir And they said transgresses Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned at the end of eating, before they leave he ??? and one master reasons that from here ??? he ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, but: a stranger i.e., a non-Jew who lent to Israel on his chametz after the Paschal offering the words of all are transgresses Hey, isn't it the case that ??? should bring himself for one for he said: there i.e., in another mishna he does not transgresses Here in this case, transgresses for one for he said: there i.e., in another mishna transgresses Here in this case, he does not transgresses

דף לא,ב גמרא

except Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? opposite him. and what they disagree about ??? Isaac for he said: R' Isaac from where do we learn ??? obligation who acquires ??? as it is said (Deut. 24) to you ??? justice if he does not he acquires ??? justice from where do we learn from here ??? obligation who acquires ??? Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna reasoned What case is he dealing with? Israel from Israel he ??? of him. to you ??? justice but: Israel ??? No. ??? reasoned ??? Israel from Israel ??? Israel ??? is it not all the more so? but: a stranger i.e., a non-Jew who lent Israel on his chametz after the Paschal offering the words of all are transgresses there i.e., in another mishna certainly a stranger i.e., a non-Jew from Israel No. ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: a stranger i.e., a non-Jew who lent Israel on his chametz after the Paschal offering is permitted. to benefit from it ??? also ??? opposite him. this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? a stranger i.e., a non-Jew from Israel No. ??? There is no difficulty. this one for he said: for him ??? this one that is not He said to him: ??? for him between in a case for he said: ??? or whether in a case that is not he said ??? as it is taught: a stranger i.e., a non-Jew ??? bread ??? next to Israel he does not transgresses and if He said to him: ??? transgresses What is different about the beginning of the teaching, And what is different about the end of the teaching except Is this not Learn from this that I in a case ??? that is not He said to him: ??? Learn from this The Rabbis taught ??? of Israel ??? of Israel ??? gentiles enters for the sake of lit. in the name of chametz ??? in that place after the Paschal offering is forbidden to benefit from it and it is not necessary to say in cases regarding eating ??? of a stranger i.e., a non-Jew ??? of a stranger i.e., a non-Jew ??? Israel enters ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of chametz ??? in that place after the Paschal offering is permitted. in cases regarding eating and it is not necessary to say to benefit from it

דף לא,ב משנה

chametz upon which has fallen a ruin Behold! it is like it was destroyed Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says this applies to all chametz that it is impossible for a dog to search after it.

דף לא,ב גמרא

Rav Chisdah said and it is necessary that he nullify the chametz in his heart it was taught how much does a dog search? three handbreadths Rav Acha the son of Rav Yosef said to him to Rav Ashi Hey, isn't it the case that Shmuel said: ??? they do not have guarding except in the earth who in the case of three handbreadths or, did not say to him Here in this case, It is because of the scent ??? in the case of three handbreadths there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: ??? he and not he is required three and how much Rafram bar Papa said ???

דף לא,ב משנה

One who eats terumah of chametz on Passover in error must make restitution the principal amount plus a fifth But one who eats terumah of chametz on Passover with intent is exempt from making restitution and from paying its value as wood

דף לא,ב גמרא

It was taught there: One who eats terumah in error must make restitution the principal amount plus a fifth one One who eats and one one who drinks