PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לה,א גמרא

except ??? Here, too, ??? Rav said ??? son of ??? Even We also ??? he immersed He ascended he eats ??? he eats from terumah from terumah yes. ??? No. why is it that tahor he except ??? So, here, ??? Rav Ashi said Even We also ??? (Lev. 7) ??? ??? frankincense pieces of wood frankincense My son, ??? except ??? Here in this case, also, ???

דף לה,א משנה

these items ??? he would exit of them the hands of ??? on Passover ??? ??? from which had been removed its terumah ??? two and that which was sanctified for Temple use who have been redeemed the priests. of separating challah and from terumah but not ??? and not ??? that did not have raised up i.e., separated its terumah and not ??? two and that which was sanctified for Temple use that did not have redeemed ??? The thangkgiving-offering ??? a Nazir ??? for himself yes. he would exit of them ??? to sell ??? of them

דף לה,א גמרא

a Tanna taught: ??? ??? ??? Behold! yes. ??? No. ??? words Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish Resh Lakish said: and thus was taught of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael and thus was taught of the academy of R' Eliezer son of Ya'akov Scripture states: (in Deut. 16) It may not be eaten upon it chametz seven days It may be eaten upon it the commandments items that come to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? a person he would exit of them the hands of ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah these that do not have come to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? except to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? Our mishna Watch out for leading vav And not like Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? for he said: ??? grain he and they are obligated on ??? he is spiritually cut off as it is taught: Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? because of ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? or perhaps, ??? you shall chametz complete. shall not be Come and hear: as it is taught: Rabbi Yochanan ben Nuri said: ??? grain he and they are obligated on ??? he is spiritually cut off a person he would exit in it the hands of ??? on Passover and thus he was Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? says ??? of separating challah What then does it mean when it says ??? Abayye said: ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? between ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said Raysh Lakish said ??? and oil ??? yes. they are obligated on ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? Rav ??? and Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua in front of Rav Idi bar Avin and Rav Idi the son of Avin sat ??? He said to him Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua for Rav, ??? What is the reason? he expounds. ??? He said to him For scripture said: It may not be eaten upon it chametz ??? items ??? he would exit of them the hands of ??? they are obligated on ??? he is spiritually cut off Hey, isn't it the case that Because And there is no meaning to the word a person he would exit of it the hands of ??? for him ??? yes. they are obligated on ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua for Rav, ??? if chametz he ??? he is spiritually cut off and if ??? he yes. a person he would exit the hands of ??? on Passover Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? a person he would exit the hands of ??? and they are obligated on ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? in them? Rav Idi bar Avin He said to them ??? we were The reason is he expounds. ??? It is because of this: where they did them who fruits

דף לה,ב גמרא

and who fruits yes. ??? he would exit ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed this one No. Look, for him immediately So if he wished, ??? you shall Responded and eats produce that may or may not have been properly tithed now also Look, for him For it was taught in a baraita ??? ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed and ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed Rav Huna said a Tanna taught: The academy of Shammai say: yes. ??? ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed and ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed but the academy of Hillel say: ??? first tithe from which had been removed its terumah ??? This is obvious! ??? from which had been removed its terumah Those who are ill you shall it is not necessary to teach this ??? and took it away lit: and picked it up from him terumah of tithe and not raised up i.e., separated from him terumah that is large ??? for he said: R' Abahu Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish Resh Lakish said: first tithe ??? is exempt ??? that is large as it is said (in Numbers 18) ??? from him terumah of Hashem tithe from the tithe tithe from the tithe Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not terumah that is large and terumah of tithe from the tithe He said to him: Rav ??? Except I can object with text from here: even ??? also ??? He said to him upon you Scripture states: (in Numbers 18) from all ??? all terumah of Hashem for just as you see This ??? and that one No. ??? second tithe and that which was sanctified for Temple use who have been redeemed ??? This is obvious! Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? ??? and it was not given ??? and Come and hear from this ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? the priests. of separating challah and from terumah ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? the value of by any person. in the case of Come and learn from this. the commandments the commandments ??? but not ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? According to Rabbinic law, ??? that is not ??? and not ??? that did not have raised up i.e., separated ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? What would you have said? Like that which was said by for him Rav ??? Come and hear from this ??? and not ??? two and that which was sanctified for Temple use that did not have redeemed ??? This is obvious! In reality lit: In the world ??? And what does it mean when it says No. redeemed that did not have redeemed ??? second tithe ??? for the sake of ??? he said (Deut. 14) ??? a thing in which there is to him an image and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? atop ??? he said (Lev. 27) and gave ??? and he stood to him The rabbis taught: It is possible he would exit a person the hands of ??? that did not have ??? all he immersed also this one No. ??? except ??? that did not have ??? all ??? from which had been removed from him terumah that is large and not raised up i.e., separated from him terumah of tithe ??? and not second tithe and even tithe Responded from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (in Deut. 16) It may not be eaten upon it chametz who ??? It is because of this: ??? It may be eaten upon it chametz he has fulfilled his obligation this that do not ??? It is because of this: ??? It may be eaten chametz except It is because of this: ??? It may be eaten he immersed ??? to where ??? Rav Sheshet said So, with whom does it agree? R' Shimon She for he said: yes. prohibits ??? on prohibits as it is taught: R' Shimon says