It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לז,א גמרא

and the academy of Hillel permit and how much time is the duration of bread ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? which provides ??? Rav Yosef disagreed if And they said ??? they shall say ??? if And they said ??? they shall say ??? that is not ??? if And they said ??? they shall say ??? if And they said ??? they shall say ??? if And they said ??? of ??? they shall say ??? of pottery he said R' Yirmiyah bar Abba ??? Rabbi ??? Rav that it is possible that they said Rav Yirmiyah bar Abba Rav said ??? Rabbi ??? our rabbi, ??? What then does it mean when it says bread ??? bread is greater than But why? ??? for him bread ??? It is because of this: ??? And if you like, I could say ??? That this a Tanna taught: ??? is greater than bread ??? for him What is the reason? If it was It is because of this: that he came ??? that is not It is necessary for him why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of on Passover even on Yom Tov also yes. Here, too, and that one a Tanna taught: on Yom Tov of Passover he arises Another teaching is like this: The academy of Shammai say: yes. ??? bread ??? on Yom Tov and the academy of Hillel permit The Rabbis taught ??? on Passover despite the fact where they said Watch out for leading vav And we do not make ??? on Passover Rav Yehudah said This item He asked ??? son of ??? to the sages On account of what did they say Watch out for leading vav And we do not make ??? on Passover They said to him: because of ??? upon it ??? He said to them: ??? immediately They said to him: they shall say all ??? are forbidden ??? are permitted Rabbi Eliezer said son of ??? One time I entered after Abba ??? Rabban Gamliel and they brought before him ??? on Passover Watch out for leading vav And I said Abba No. thus in the same way the sages said Watch out for leading vav And we do not make ??? on Passover He said to me: My son, No. of every person And they said except of ??? And they said that it is possible that they said thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him No. of ??? And they said except of every person R' Yosi said doing ??? And we do not make ??? The Rabbis taught ??? ??? are exempt from ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: this ??? of ??? houses Raysh Lakish said ??? It once happened ??? there are. And Rabbi Yochanan said: It once happened ??? they are obligated ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? they are obligated ??? are exempt ??? of Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish Resh Lakish Ulla said He could say to you Rabbi Shimon son of ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? and in the end ??? but: ??? and in the end ??? What about in this case, too, ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? are exempt ??? ??? ??? In what matters are we saying this? For example, ??? and in the end ??? but: ??? and in the end ??? are exempt it is lacking a missing clause And this is what the tanna means to teach: In what matters are we saying this? ??? and in the end ??? but: ??? and in the end ??? was it made? ??? and are exempt Come and hear: ??? Here in this case, also, ??? and in the end ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said all ??? And there is no meaning to the word threads ??? Rabba said: and thus ??? a thangkgiving-offering This is obvious! Here in this case, bread it is written and here in this other case, bread it is written What would you have said? Because and then it is written (Lev. 7) and he sacrificed from him

דף לז,ב גמרא

one from all sacrifice one that did not have wash ??? and here in this other case, like who ??? is comparable Come and learn from this. They challenged him from this teaching: ??? the academy of Shammai ??? And the academy of Hillel ??? the academy of Shammai ??? and the academy of Hillel ??? Who is ??? and Who is ??? for upon regarding ??? for upon regarding ??? R' Yishmael ??? says in the name of his father both this and this ??? And there are those who say it was both this and this ??? But the sages say: One of these and one of these ??? is exempt ??? he is liable and it was taught that came first what is the difference here, ??? and what is the difference here, ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said and thus R' Yehudah said: (and there are those who say R' Yehoshua son of Levi ??? thus in the same way It is a disagreement ??? who ??? -- this refers to No. year" -- this refers to The tanna teaches: Regardless, But the sages say: One of these and one of these ??? is exempt ??? he is liable ??? of R' Yochanan He could say to you R' Yochanan ??? She as it is taught: It is possible ??? they are obligated of separating challah Scripture states: bread R' Yehuda says: yes. bread except ??? R' Yehudah we were a Tanna taught: that came first except Is this not It once happened ??? There is this difference between them: a Tanna taught: that came first reasoned It once happened ??? they are obligated And R' Yehudah reasoned It once happened ??? are exempt No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world It once happened ??? are exempt and here in this other case, For example, ??? that came first reasoned immediately ??? bread we recite of him. And R' Yehudah reasoned yes. bread except ??? from the beginning And because of the fact originally Is this not ??? Is this not bread he Rabba said: What is the reason? with R' Yehudah As it is written (Lev. 26) ??? ten women ??? one bread ??? one ??? bread and those that do not ??? one yes. ??? bread ??? Rabbah and Rav Yosef; ??? of Rabbi Zeira ??? R' Zeira in front because of Ulla He said to him: Rabbah to R' Zeira he is required of him ??? What then? He said to him: What then does it mean when it says I would say for him For if it was I thought to say for him He said to me: Which ??? It once happened ??? He said to him Rav Yosef to Rabbi Zeira They asked of him ??? opposite him What then? He said to him: What then does it mean when it says I would say for him For if it was I thought to say for him He said to me: most of ??? doing thus Rav Assi said: ??? of second tithe according to the words of R' Meir ??? from ??? according to the words of the sages ??? of separating challah

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.