PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13
Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.
Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits
This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.
This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."
I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף מד,א גמרא
in the matter of chametz on Passover also yes. Here, too, and To exclude ??? for he said: there are ??? an olive's volume Come and hear from this. ??? Is this not ??? an olive's volume ??? Rav Dimi and he said to it about this teaching ??? Abaye said to him: for Rav, ??? and all ??? yes. permission ??? For it was taught in a mishna: the soup ??? of terumah ??? and the oil of Those who are ill ??? A tevul yom ??? all of them the soup ??? of Those who are ill ??? and the oil of terumah ??? A tevul yom ??? No. ??? except a place ??? only. and we were at of it a place ??? why is it that is invalid this one ??? them ??? and Rabbah bar bar Channah said What is the reason? Because ??? about them in the amount like an olive How so? Is this not It is because of this: ??? No. What then does it mean when it says an olive's volume That there are an olive's volume ??? and an olive's volume ??? a law established by the Torah She He said to him yes. If so, why is it that ??? rabbis upon it ??? Rather, what can we conclude? It is because of this: ??? the end of the end of why is it that ??? rabbis upon it ??? except ??? of him. an olive's volume ??? If it was ??? for him nullification ??? next to every person and if ??? is not there? an olive's volume ??? two ??? One of Those who are ill and one of terumah ??? two ??? One of Those who are ill and one of terumah ??? these ??? these are permitted for I say terumah ??? "She has fallen and Those who are ill ??? Those who are ill ??? And if you say an olive's volume ??? a law established by the Torah why is it that say for I say terumah ??? etc. He said to him ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? two ??? One of Those who are ill and one of terumah and before them two ??? One of Those who are ill and one of terumah ??? these ??? these are permitted for I say Those who are ill ??? Those who are ill ??? terumah ??? terumah "She has fallen And if you say an olive's volume ??? a law established by the Torah why is it that say for I say He said to him: ??? in these times (nowadays) is a law established by the Rabbis and that one ??? he who has arrived This should bring himself to account for that which was taught ???
דף מד,ב גמרא
to give ??? Sarah grapes in water and there are of them ??? wine he is liable from here you ??? for all the Torah All of it for just as a Nazir that do not ??? prohibits the world And there is no meaning to the word ??? prohibits benefit and there are permission ??? One who acts in it ??? prohibits the world ??? prohibits benefit And there is no meaning to the word permission ??? is it not logical ??? and it is the law ??? in two, So, with whom does it agree? It is the rabbis' position and Rabbi Yochanan for he said: like Rabbi ??? Which Rabbi Akiva Shall I say Rabbi Akiva ??? For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Akiva says: a Nazir ??? his bread ??? and there are in it to combine so that an olive's volume he is liable And from where do you derive ??? and than wine perhaps, than wine ??? And if you say than wine ??? what is there to say? Thus can we come and learn from this. ??? except Rabbi Akiva ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Akiva says: a Nazir ??? his bread ??? he ate an olive's volume ??? and than wine he is liable and Rabbi Akiva ??? for him he learns it ??? Is this not The reason is in reality he is forbidden Here in this case, also, there is no difference And the rabbbis ??? No. we complete it ??? he And what does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say That this ??? and that one ??? Sarai and together is forbidden ??? also This ??? and that one ??? Sarai ??? is forbidden except For if it was ??? for him the entire day ??? Sarai ??? for him ??? is forbidden and Rabbi Akiva also meat ??? certainly ??? he except he learns it ??? gentiles ??? gentiles Is this not The reason is in reality he is forbidden Here in this case, also, They did not teach this לא שנו And the rabbbis ??? gentiles also ??? he for it is the case that all he gives ??? is permitted. ??? and here in this other case, is forbidden and Rabbi Akiva Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav Chiyya the son of For Rav Huna for he said: No. ??? Torah except ??? the daughter of day Therefore, Is this not he gives ??? he And the rabbbis ??? the daughter of day also No. ??? that is not ??? He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? to Rav Ashi According to Rabbinic law, ??? to Rabbi ??? who they do not say rabbis ??? to give ??? from here you ??? for all ??? to Rabbi ??? also ??? from here you ??? for all ??? All of it He said to him
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.