PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מח,א גמרא

(Ezek. 45) from ??? two hundred ??? from here ??? Israel from ??? to Israel from here yes. said bring in ??? from ??? It is possible No. ??? from ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? Just as he immersed ??? to him Even all ??? to him he has fulfilled his obligation muktzeh that do not prohibits ??? to him except prohibits Another thing: ??? to him And if you say prohibits muktzeh a law established by the Torah What do I have to learn from prohibits ??? What do I have to learn from prohibits Another thing: And furthermore, this one he that you said dividing among the guests ??? to Shabbat And there is no meaning to the word dividing among the guests ??? except ??? an Ashera ??? from here (Deut. 13) There will not cleave into your hand ??? from the ban" He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Raba ??? also It is because of this: (Deut. 7) and Do not bring an abomination unto your houses except ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? from here (Deut. 12) ??? in fire No. ??? thus to Hashem "Your God" he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama this one of Rav Chisda and Rabbah It is a disagreement ??? and Rabbi Yehoshua She ??? reasoned say Because and Rabbi Yehoshua reasoned we do not say Because Rav Pappa said: and perhaps, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? Because except ??? that he came ??? all one and one ??? for him for him But here, in this case, ??? he ??? for him No. Look, I would say Here, too, that is not say Because Rav said ??? the son of of Rav This and perhaps, No. She Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yehoshua there i.e., in another mishna that is not say Because except That there are one that is not ??? No. for him and not ??? But here, in this case, ??? Regardless, ??? I would say Here, too, say Because ??? in front of Rabbi ??? and R' Zeira R' ??? R' Zeira No. ??? He said to him Rabbi ??? to Rabbi Zeira the validity ??? to us and it comes to how much two in what way ??? and R' Yehoshua now ??? in the name ??? Rabbah and not ??? He said to him: in what way does ??? He said to him: Rabbi Yehoshua ??? Behold! he transgresses It is because of this: (Ex. 20) No. shall you do all work ??? for him and if ??? Let us say, for him The reason is ??? It is because of this: Because He said to him ??? this one ??? He said to him: ??? Behold! he transgresses It is because of this: ??? He will see ??? he shall find ??? for him So, here, that is not ??? for him This one comes to he turned for him ??? For it was taught in a baraita No. ??? chametz ??? upon it It is because of this: ??? He will see ??? he shall find except ??? for him ??? he turned for him ??? So, here, ??? for him ??? for him ??? It was taught: Rabbi says The halacha is ??? and R' Isaac he said The halacha is ??? and how much time is the duration of the measure ??? Rabbi Yishmael his son of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah says ??? R' Natan says: It is because of this: ??? the things For it was taught: Rabbi Yishmael his son of R' Yochanan son of ??? says ??? four ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one ??? Rav Pappa said: Learn from this ??? that is elevated i.e., important ??? that is elevated i.e., important For this there i.e., in another mishna ??? and here in this other case, ??? Rav said ??? and thus ???

דף מח,ב גמרא

??? And furthermore, they are obligated of separating challah thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? also ??? he arises Rav Yosef said Behold! ??? He said to him Abaye What then does it mean when it says ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? he that he came ??? to it sickens He said to him ??? Eliezer ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: ??? he gives ??? And Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi Eliezer He said to him Hey, isn't it the case that it was said: He ascended Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: They did not teach such a ruling except loaves of ??? -- this refers to ??? but: ??? No. this one it was said: He ascended Rabbi Chanina said: Even if ??? he is required R' ??? that it does not have ??? What then? ??? implements of in the case of And that is absent here or perhaps, ??? implements of in the case of And this is present here. ??? It was taught: R' Eliezer says: ??? Rabbi Yehoshua says: an oven ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says loaves of ??? -- this refers to ???

דף מח,ב משנה

Rabban Gamliel says: three women ??? as one ??? one -- this refers to after -- this refers to But the sages say: three women ??? as one One ??? and one ??? and one baking R' ??? says No. all the women and not all ??? and not all ??? they agree This is the general rule: ???

דף מח,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? She ??? underneath it ??? She baking ??? underneath it ??? baking She ??? baking underneath it ??? The whole time ??? he does not came to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? Rabbi Akiva says: No. all the women ??? It was taught: he said Rabbi Akiva my ruling? before Rabban Gamliel ??? our rabbi, ??? or ??? that do not ??? or ??? or ??? He said to me: yes. to you except Just as ??? the sages This is the general rule: ???

דף מח,ב משנה

??? is exempt ??? he is liable he is spiritually cut off Who is ??? locusts ??? this to that these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. But the sages say: both this and this ??? he is liable he is spiritually cut off and Who is ??? all ??? his face like a person that stand ???

דף מח,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: Who is ??? all ??? his face like a person that stand ??? locusts These are the words of R' Meir But the sages say: Who is ??? locusts ??? this to that and both this and this ??? he is liable he is spiritually cut off ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? is exempt these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. I would say to Rabbi Meir both this and this ??? he is liable he is spiritually cut off Rabba said: What is the reason? For R' ??? yes. to you all ??? upwards that do not to him how much ??? downwards