PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13
Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.
Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits
This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.
This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."
I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף נא,א גמרא
If it was you permission ??? He said to him: Is this not who it was said: He ascended Rav Chisdah said ??? What is the reason? It is because of this: ??? the validity ??? also ??? the validity except Rav Ashi said ??? If it was ??? No. ??? perhaps, ??? and if ??? grain ??? perhaps, will come ??? from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? Back to the main body of the text: items ??? and others ??? of them prohibits If it was you permission ??? Rav Chisdah said ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? No. For it was taught: ??? two ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? two ??? And it once happened in Yehudah and Hallel his children of Rabban Gamliel ??? both ??? about them all ??? And they said "In his right hand is No. ??? thus in the same way ??? Hallel and went out ??? and not running to say to them are permitted "You they go out ??? on Shabbat And there is no meaning to the word ??? on Shabbat ??? And it once happened in Yehudah and Hallel his children of Rabban Gamliel that were taken out from the Courtyard ??? on Shabbat ??? about them ??? And they said "In his right hand is No. ??? thus in the same way ??? and not ??? to say to them are permitted "You they sit on ??? gentiles on Shabbat and are not they sit on ??? gentiles on Shabbat in Acco, And it once happened ??? son of ??? on ??? gentiles on Shabbat in Acco, ??? upon it all ??? And they said "In his right hand is No. ??? thus in the same way ??? atop ??? and not running to say to them are permitted "You My son, ??? the sea also immediately that is not ??? rabbis ??? This is satisfactory ??? gentiles It is because of this: ??? also perhaps, ??? and comes ??? four cubits in a public domain except ??? What is the reason? No. As it is taught: with The entirety a person wash except ??? and the master of of its mother and the master of ??? And R' Yehudah permits ??? because of honor his father and it is the law ??? of its mother and they came we do not have ??? with two ??? It is because of this: the master of ??? a Tanna taught: ??? No. ??? with his rabbi; and if his rabbi; It is necessary for him to him is permitted. For he came Rabbah son of son of ??? he ate ??? the yoke of ??? Rav ??? elder and Rabbah the son of For Rav Huna immediately ??? they came and they said to him: ??? He said to them ??? and Rabbah son of son of ??? he does not have this one For it was taught in a baraita ??? upon it ??? the place that went out From here ??? the place ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of Abayye said: What case is he dealing with? ??? and from the land of Israel ??? So, too, ??? but: ??? No. immediately ??? them ??? Rav Ashi said: even you say ??? What case is he dealing with? in a case ??? and Rabbah son of son of ??? it was. He said to him Rabbah son of son of ??? to his children: My son, It may not be eaten No. before and not that did not have before I ??? R' Yochanan who ate so that he R' Yochanan to make adjacent upon it in his face, or in the case that one is not in his face, you No. you see that specific It may not be eaten between before between that did not have before and disagrees that are his ??? for he said: Rabbah son of son of ??? for me Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? One time I entered after Rabbi Shimon son of Rabbi Yosei son of ???
דף נא,ב גמרא
and he took ??? he ate and gave for me And he said to me My son, before ??? that did not have before It may not be eaten I ??? Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai who ate so that he R' Shimon ben Yochai to make adjacent upon it in his face, or in the case that one is not in his face, you before ??? that did not have before It may not be eaten What then does it mean when it says Rabbi Shimon as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon says: all ??? are forbidden except ??? that do not is subject to the same laws as them ??? ??? the field but the sages say all ??? are forbidden both of them. who follow the reasoning ??? For R' ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 25) there are. No. ??? and not ??? ??? Rabbi Akiva said: And so based on this lit: from after, that do not we sow ??? from here ??? that are are forbidden in what way ??? rabbis reason that ??? because the remainder of ??? of the world and Rabbi Shimon reasoned No. ??? because ??? One who walks ??? This is satisfactory One who walks ??? to the place that do not doing ??? upon it ??? a place ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of and do not that is old a person because of ??? and not ??? except ??? that do not doing to the place ??? to that is old a person because of ??? this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? upon it ??? a place ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? a place that went out From here Abayye said: He interprets it as referring to the earlier text Rava said: In reality lit: In the world ??? and thus he comes to say yes. ??? because of who changes ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? the one who sees says work forbidden ??? They said: how much ??? you shall in the marketplace He said to him Rav ??? to Rabbi Abba For example, We ???
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.