PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13
Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.
Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits
Disclaimers
This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.
Copyright
This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."
Credits
I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף נט,א גמרא
??? a thing as it is said in it in the evening, and twilight for a matter of that did not have it is said in it in the evening, except twilight only. If so, incense ??? also ??? a thing as it is said in it in the evening, and twilight for a matter of that did not have it is said in it except twilight only. It is different there in that case ??? the Merciful One that specific as it is taught: (Ex. 27) est and until mornings give to it ??? that it should be ??? est until ??? Another thing: yes. to you the blessing of the Service ??? est until ??? except -- this refers to only. What is the reason? Scripture states: (Ex. 27) ??? that specific "... Aharon and his sons est until mornings that specific est until ??? And there is no meaning to the word Another thing: est until ??? incense ??? and it was taught: For ??? The Tamid-offering before ??? incense ??? a thing as it is said in it in the evening, and twilight for a matter of that did not have it is said in it except twilight only. Hey, isn't it the case that it is written that specific This that specific should bring himself ??? the blessing of the Service ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? incense You might have thought that I would say that Because and then it is written (Ex. 30) ??? ??? twilight ??? I would say ??? lamps ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? the incense ??? the Merciful One that specific except twilight ??? why do I have thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: the Merciful One in the time of ??? lamps shall be ??? incense The rabbis taught: yes. to you a thing ??? of the morning except incense only. as it is said of it in the morning in the morning ??? incense a thing as it is said in it in the morning in the morning As it is written (Ex. 30) ??? upon it ??? incense ??? in the morning in the morning for a matter of that did not have it is said in it except mornings one And there is no meaning to the word to you a thing ??? after The Tamid-offering of twilight except incense ??? Passover ??? On the eve of Pesach ??? and eats ??? Rabbi Yishmael his son of Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? says Even ??? in the remainder of ??? the year ??? and eats ??? This is satisfactory a Tanna that came first ??? One who acts ??? in which there is in it he is spiritually cut off ??? One who acts ??? in which is not he is spiritually cut off except to R' Yishmael his son of R' Yochanan son of ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? That this One who acts ??? One who acts Ravina said Rav Chisdah said Here in this case, the case is that of a sin-offering, ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) that do not ??? except of its blood Rav Papa said, even you say the case is that of a sin-offering, livestock ??? on its head of An altar of ??? a guilt-offering This is satisfactory for Rav, ??? we were ??? to it except for Rav, ??? What is there to say? They said: ??? an elevation-offering And if you would say an elevation-offering is not essential For it was taught: R' Yishmael his son of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah says in the same way ??? that specific thus in the same way ??? is essential to it And if you say ??? and who ??? before ??? For it was taught: (Lev. 5) and he sacrificed those whom ??? the first Just as Therefore, scripture states: if to teach that it should be ??? Behold! Already it is said (Lev. 5) and the second may he do it? an elevation-offering ??? except this he built ??? for all sin-offerings ??? for all ??? with them ??? that even A sin-offering of a bird: ??? livestock Rabba said: that I ??? one suffering from tzara'at ??? he said
דף נט,ב גמרא
(Lev. 14) and raised up ??? raised up ??? Already He said to him: Watch out for leading vav And Rav Shman??? bar Abba for Rav, ??? that you said ??? on its head of An altar of ??? the validity to the priests ??? of it to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? he and they came ??? He said to him: priests ??? there are. He said to him: Rav Ashi for Rav, ??? And there are those who say it was Rav Huna the son of of Rav he gave for Rav, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that how much that is not ??? priests No. ??? meat as it is taught: It is possible ??? priests ??? before ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 7) ??? ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had (Lev. 7) and it was the case that ??? and to his children and how much time is the duration of ??? No. ??? meat ??? No. ??? as it is taught: (Ex. 29) and he ate ??? who ??? at them." This teaches ??? He said to him: immediately where it is not possible ??? or ??? as it is taught: It is possible ??? or ??? No. ??? priests ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 7) and it was the case that ??? and to his children from all a place Rav Kahana pointed out a contradiction. it is written (Ex. 23) No. ??? milk ??? until mornings until ??? he that is not ??? this one all the night. All of it ??? and then it is written (Lev. 6) ??? upon it ??? upon it ??? all ??? all of them he ??? to it This is only in the case ??? to it ??? pointed out a contradiction. ??? Rav ??? for Rav, it is written (Ex. 34) No. ??? to visit zevach-offering the Holiday of Sukkot the Paschal offering to visit he that is not ??? this one all the night. ??? For it is written (Num. 28) ??? Sabbath ??? and not ??? weekday on Shabbat and not ??? weekday on Yom Tov He said to him: Already ??? Rav Abba son of Chiyya to Rabbi ??? and a second person for him Here in this case, ??? ten that falls to be on Shabbat is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? Sabbath ??? on Yom Tov He said to him: It is because of this: ??? Sabbath ??? on Yom Tov We ??? And let him say for him That this he read ??? ten that falls to be on Shabbat it is written: He said to him: ???
דף נט,ב משנה
the Paschal offering ??? that did not have ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- that did not have ??? or ??? or in the case that one is not ??? or that did not have ??? is invalid, How so? ??? or in the case that one is not ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings that did not have ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover
דף נט,ב גמרא
he is required Rav ??? In a single act of service We have learnt in a Mishna: or ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: In a single act of service We have learnt in a Mishna: and It is Rabbi Yosei for he said: Even ??? his words a person ??? For if it was ??? this statement that he said poses a contradiction: ???
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.