PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ו,א גמרא

we were ??? No. he shall find except for one for he said: ??? he is equivalent. No. he shall find why do I have It is necessary to teach this You might have thought that I would say that Because And so ??? he returns ??? Is this not ??? he arises Come and hear from this. They asked of him ??? or yes. ??? all in a case ??? for him ??? No. ??? to us ??? For ??? to us in a case that is not ??? for him ??? What then does it mean when it says He said to them ??? For it was taught: ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? for him that it is possible that they said Rabba said: ??? from ??? and even though ??? for him ??? of separating challah and even though that is not ??? for him What is the reason? livestock ??? to it ??? to it ??? The rabbis taught: a stranger i.e., a non-Jew ??? of Israel ??? in his hand yes. ??? opposite him. ??? to him the house of yes. ??? as it is said No. he shall find What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav Pappa said: He interprets it as referring to the earlier text he arises and thus he comes to say ??? opposite him. ??? as it is said No. he shall find Rav Ashi said: In reality lit: In the world ??? he arises and thus he comes to say ??? to him the house of yes. ??? as it is said No. he shall find ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Is this not that are his he ??? For ??? This comes to imply ??? For it was taught in a mishna: Even in a place where they said to rent No. to a house of residence And they said because of ??? to its midst idolatry and if You might have thought ??? For ??? that I Here in this case, ??? the Merciful One ??? No. he shall find who ??? into your hand he has fulfilled his obligation this that is not is found into your hand Rav Yehudah said Rav said The one who finds chametz in his house on Yom Tov ??? upon it ??? Rabba said: if of that which was sanctified for Temple use he it is not necessary for him What is the reason? ??? of him and Rav Yehudah said Rav said his chametz of a stranger i.e., a non-Jew makes to him a partition ten handbreadths It is because of this: ??? and if of that which was sanctified for Temple use he it is not necessary for him What is the reason? ??? of him and Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? but that which is coming out ??? before thirty day yes. ??? thirty day ??? Abayye said: That which you said, ??? thirty day ??? They did not say that except in a case whose knowledge ??? but: yes. ??? yes. ??? He said to him: Raba and if ??? even ??? the year also except Rabba said: That which you said, before thirty day yes. ??? They did not say that except in a case that his attention is not ??? but: ??? even ??? the year ??? And he is consistent Raba with his reasoning for he said: Raba One who makes his house ??? before thirty day yes. ??? thirty day ??? and before thirty also They did not say that except in a case that his attention is not ??? but: ??? even before thirty day also ??? Behold! thirty day What then does it mean when it says ??? As it is taught: we ask ??? the Paschal offering before the Paschal offering thirty day R' Shimon son of ??? says two ??? What is the reason? ??? that came first

דף ו,ב גמרא

for behold! Moses ??? on Passover ??? on the Paschal offering two as it is said (Num. 9) ??? the Children of Israel the Paschal offering ??? and then it is written (Num. 9) And it was men who they were ??? a person and R' Shimon son of ??? He could say to you ??? of matters ??? them for all words ??? What is the reason? ??? for behold! Moses ??? on top of lit. on the head of ??? on the Paschal offering as it is said (Ex. 12) ??? to you the tip of months and then it is written His word to all ??? Israel saying: ??? to renew ??? and they took to them a man ??? the forefathers etc. From where can you derive ??? he arises perhaps, ??? or in five ??? he arises except Rabbah said son of ??? in the name of Ravina from here (Num. 9) And he said ??? to Moses in the wilderness ??? in the year ??? and then it is written (Num. 9) ??? the Children of Israel the Paschal offering ??? Here in this case, also, From where can you derive ??? he arises perhaps, ??? or in five ??? he arises Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said We come to compare ??? It is written here in the wilderness ??? And it is written there (Num. 1) And he said ??? to Moses in the wilderness ??? festival on the first to renew the second Just as there on top of lit. on the head of new Even here, on top of lit. on the head of new ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? two Rav said ??? son of ??? in the name of Rav This one says yes. ??? in the Torah Rav Pappa said: They did not say that except in a case it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? but: it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? For if it was No. you say thus A general principle: and creates an exclusion yes. are in the general category except Just as ??? perhaps, creates an exclusion and A general principle: he And, too, creates an exclusion and A general principle: was it made? A general principle: ??? on ??? perhaps, A general principle: and creates an exclusion he If so, even it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? also This is satistfactory for one for he said: A general principle: and creates an exclusion ??? this from this yes. ??? that specific are in the general category and creates an exclusion then the ruling is acceptable. except for one for he said: ??? What is there to say? even ??? What case is he dealing with? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? but: it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? yes. ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? It is necessary for him that he nullify What is the reason? If you were to say It is because of this: ??? this one No. ??? And if you say immediately ??? them ??? For it was taught: ??? figs and the rotating watch-group (mishmar) ??? because of grapes ??? grapes and the rotating watch-group (mishmar) ??? because of ??? and because of ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? the house ??? about them are forbidden It is because of this: ??? and they are obligated ??? at a time i.e., in a case that do not the master of the house ??? about them are permitted It is because of this: ??? and are exempt It is because of this: tithe Rabba said: ??? lest he shall find ??? proper ??? And so ??? for him ??? perhaps, ??? for him ??? Is this not ??? and he did not find ??? for thus said Rabbi ??? two items are not ??? of a person ??? the scripture it is as if ??? and they are a pit in a public domain and chametz ??? and onwards ??? in four, ??? immediately ??? time ??? he Is this not time ??? he perhaps, ??? and not nullify for him