PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ס,א גמרא

or perhaps, ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: And even if to R' ??? for he said: ??? What case is he dealing with? In a single act of service but: ??? give thanks ??? They said: ??? If you were to say ??? between In a single act of service between ??? between to R' ??? between to R' ??? for him ??? for it is the case that to Rabbi Yosei: also Even ??? his words a person ??? it has except ??? or in the case that one is not ??? What then does it mean when it says Come and hear: the Paschal offering ??? that did not have ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- that did not have ??? How so? If you were to say ??? why do I have until ??? for him except Is this not Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: the Paschal offering ??? that did not have ??? So, too, ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- that did not have ??? So, too, ??? he has walked ??? In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- that did not have ??? to it two ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? or in the case that one is not ??? How so? If you were to say ??? we were But the beginning of the teaching, except Is this not In a single act of service and it was R' Yosi for he said: Even ??? his words a person ??? No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and the beginning of the teaching, and it was standing ??? he arises Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified ??? at the end of the teaching, and it was standing ??? Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified for he said: Behold, I am slaughtering the Paschal offering ??? to throw ??? that did not have ??? So come and learn from this. ??? And this is like the position ??? of Rav ??? Come and hear: or that did not have ??? is invalid, How so? If you were to say ??? now ??? or in the case that one is not ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? is invalid, that did not have ??? except Is this not In a single act of service ??? In a single act of service But the beginning of the teaching, also In a single act of service No. In reality lit: In the world ??? In justice, he that is not It is necessary to teach this for him ??? or in the case that one is not ??? a Tanna taught: also that did not have ??? Come and hear: ??? that did not have ??? or in the case that one is not by those in its "minyan" ??? is invalid, Here in this case, This is obvious! In a single act of service ??? In a single act of service But the beginning of the teaching, also In a single act of service something ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has at the end of the teaching, In a single act of service But the beginning of the teaching, whether the intention to do things improperly applied in a single act of service, or whether in two services Come and hear: ??? or in the case that one is not ??? is valid How so? If you were to say ??? and the reason ??? Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified ??? they eat Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified this one In a single act of service For example, ??? of him. ??? they eat is invalid, Hey, isn't it the case that ??? to us a small portion of they eat No. ???

דף ס,ב גמרא

except Is this not In a single act of service ??? In a single act of service But the beginning of the teaching, also In a single act of service something ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has at the end of the teaching, In a single act of service and the beginning of the teaching, or In a single act of service or ??? They posed this difficulty: Passover ??? in the remainder of ??? the year ??? or in the case that one is not ??? What then? who will come that did not have ??? for him something ??? considers it proper for him or No. When Rav Dimi came he said ??? in front For R' ??? Because ??? or in the case that one is not ??? that did not have ??? Just as ??? yes. ??? something that did not have ??? Even that did not have ??? that did not have ??? yes. ??? something ??? is invalid, And he said to me No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? which provides accustomed in all ??? shall you say ??? which provides is not customary in all ??? except on Passover only. What then do we do about it? Rabba said: Passover ??? in the remainder of ??? the year ??? or in the case that one is not ??? is valid for it is the case that ??? he arises and even thus For ??? for him that did not have ??? is valid Perhaps, will come that did not have ??? for him something ??? For ??? also ??? or in the case that one is not ??? will come that did not have ??? for him something ??? He said to him Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? to Raba perhaps, that I in a case for he said: ??? that is not he said for it is the case that ??? or in the case that one is not ??? is valid and all in a case ??? for him that did not have ??? is invalid, But why? this one ??? he arises except that I in a case for he said: ??? that is not he said Here, too, that I in a case for he said: ??? that is not he said He said to him something ??? This is satisfactory there i.e., in another mishna how much that is not He uprooted for him ??? certainly ??? he arises except Here in this case, ??? he arises perhaps, ??? Behold! and comes ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? ??? from him until ??? They posed this difficulty: Passover ??? in the remainder of ??? the year ??? What then? who changes ??? he is equivalent. considers it proper for him or did not say Rav ??? in front of Raba Because who changes ??? who changes ??? Just as who changes ??? after its time Even who changes ??? after its time And he said to me No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? which provides ??? in four, ???