PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סא,א גמרא

??? after death ??? by the community ??? shall you say ??? and does not in four, ??? and does not after death and does not by the community ??? Even though it will be ??? This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ both from this ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed ??? who changes ??? that is not you shall ??? in reality She who changes ??? also ??? in reality She And, too, this one for he said: who changes ??? he does not after death and for Rav, ??? of Rav Ami for he said: there are who changes ??? after death What is there to say? both Regardless, ??? except Rabba said: Passover ??? in the remainder of ??? the year ??? was it made? ??? that do not to him ??? is invalid,

דף סא,א משנה

??? that did not have ??? or in the case that one is not by those in its "minyan" ??? is invalid, ??? or in the case that one is not ??? by those in its "minyan" or in the case that one is not by those in its "minyan" ??? is valid ??? before ??? is invalid, It is because of this: as it is said (Ex. 12) twilight ??? before ??? is valid but only that it should be after ??? until ??? and if ??? is value

דף סא,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught How so? that did not have ??? an ill person or ??? an elderly person How so? that did not have by those in its "minyan" ??? upon it ??? -- this refers to ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? words ??? (Ex. 12) ??? This teaches that do not the Paschal offering ??? except by those in its "minyan" It is possible ??? that did not have by those in its "minyan" ??? on the Commandment and is valid Scripture states: ??? the scripture year" upon it ??? R' says ??? he like a person ??? to his fellow a cup for me ??? this ??? that did not have by those in its "minyan" that did not have ??? What is our source for this claim Scripture states: (Ex. 12) a man on account of he ate ??? they eat ???

דף סא,ב גמרא

??? in order ??? in it ??? Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified Rav Chisda he said is invalid, Rava said: is valid Rav Chisda he said is invalid, there are ??? Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified Rava said: is valid yes. ??? Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified Rabbah said ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: It is possible ??? Members of a fellowship those who are coming back with it It would be a logical inference Because and orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? Just as ??? No. One who acts of it a small portion of ??? Even orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree No. One who acts of it a small portion of orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree or ??? on the way -- this refers to Because and orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? and time invalidates it Just as time One who acts of it a small portion of time ??? time Even orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree One who acts of it a small portion of orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? to whoever ??? a thing that is not accustomed in all ??? that is not accustomed in all ??? and do not He corrects time ??? in all ??? or ??? on the way -- this refers to ??? a thing that did not have ??? that did not have ??? and do not ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 12) this What then does it mean when it says this Shall I say ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? No. ??? This ??? except Is this not Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: Scripture states: and all ??? All of it orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? No. ??? And if you say it is the law ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree from this ??? Scripture states: this ??? he ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree from this ??? but: ??? even All of it orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree also No. ??? And if you say What then does it mean when it says ??? they eat Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified and Rav Chisda ??? side Scripture states: and all ??? All of it orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? No. ??? but: ??? even ??? also ??? And if you say it is the law ??? that until That there are All of it orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree No. ??? Scripture states: this ??? he ??? No. ??? but: ??? even ??? And if you would say And what does it mean when it says ??? that is not ??? an invalidating act nevertheless except Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified He disagreed with this Rav Ashi Watch out for leading vav And from where do you have it that and all ??? All of it ??? perhaps, This and all ??? all ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: this that until That there are All of it orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree No. ??? there is no difference ??? and there is no difference Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified except Rav Ashi said Rav Chisda and Rabbah