PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סב,א גמרא

??? he read what they disagree about (Lev. 1) ??? to him ??? upon it upon it and not on his fellow Rabbah reasoned his fellow is equivalent that are his Just as he a thing atonement Even his fellow a thing atonement To exclude This ??? son of atonement he and Rav Chisda reasoned This ??? also immediately a thing ??? he son of atonement he ??? So if he wished, ??? and who it has for Rav, ??? Because Hey, isn't it the case that it was said: the baking ??? Rav Chisda he said ??? Rava said: he does not ??? Rava said: he does not ??? say Because and if ??? for him ??? Look, for him now also Look, for him and not ??? Rav Chisda he said ??? we do not say Because This is satisfactory of Rabbah ??? There is no difficulty. Here in this case, ??? It once happened there i.e., in another mishna that is not ??? It once happened except of Rav Chisda ??? it is a problem They said: For he does not have for Rav, ??? Because ??? it has He said to him: Mar Zutra the son of of Rav ??? The tanna teaches: Because and orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? Just as ??? No. One who acts of it a small portion of ??? Even orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree No. One who acts a small portion of orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree This ??? How so? Shall I say ??? men And what does it mean when it says No. One who acts of it a small portion of ??? For if it was that it is possible four and five men ??? and four and five men ??? No. ??? them ??? regarding orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree also this one No. ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? is valid what is the difference here, ??? for him and what is the difference here, orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? for him except ??? meat And what does it mean when it says No. One who acts of it a small portion of ??? For this ??? one ??? This ??? for him And the other one ??? for him in what way have you established that it is ??? meat I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? a thing that is not accustomed in all ??? that is not accustomed in all ??? and do not He corrects time ??? in all ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? If you were to say ??? meat why is it that is not customary in all ??? except This is obvious! ??? men And what does it mean when it says is not customary in all ??? For this in all ??? and tamei ??? And even on Passover ??? and tamei yes. ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? meat and at the end of the teaching, ??? men He said to him there is not there ??? And if you wish, I would say at the end of the teaching, also ??? meat And what does it mean when it says is not customary in all ??? For this in all ??? between that became tamei, milk meat stood i.e., as long as he lived between that became tamei, meat and milk stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? the blood And even on Passover ??? milk meat stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? the blood ??? meat and milk stood i.e., as long as he lived he does not ??? the blood in what way have you established that it is ??? meat I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? a thing that did not have ??? that did not have ??? and do not ??? for behold! ??? in what way Shall I say

דף סב,ב גמרא

??? meat in a case ??? except This is obvious! ??? men in a case ??? (in the case of a community offering) But the beginning of the teaching, ??? meat at the end of the teaching, ??? men there is not there ??? And if you wish, I would say All of it ??? meat in a case ??? Passover For it was taught in a baraita Passover that comes ??? is eaten ??? that did not have came ??? except as regard to eating, He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua the Paschal offering ??? and thus ??? others for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover ??? invalidates it and Rabbi Yehoshua considers it proper The reason is ??? this one that did not have ??? is valid But why? Let him say Because ??? invalidates it that did not have ??? also invalidates it Rav Pappa said: It is different there in that case For scripture said: (Ex. 12) ??? zevach-offering Passover he he ??? No. he ??? others and not others ??? it is invalid. ??? others others ??? that did not have ??? that he was is valid ??? others others are proper ??? R' ??? he came in front of Rabbi Yochanan He said to him ??? for me Master, ??? He said to him ??? He said to him ??? in Nehardaya He said to him yes. ??? No. ??? and not ??? and all the more so ??? in Nehardaya ??? He said to him ??? of him. He said to him for just as ??? of Rabbi Meir ??? son of ??? as it is taught: three hundred that he brought ??? than three hundred ??? But nevertheless, No. Came forth the hands of ??? and is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? For ??? and it comes He said to him Rabbi Just as between ??? or in the case that one is not ??? or in the case that one is not ??? He said to him Because ??? from the rabbis come and so go ahead and say to you ??? or in the case that one is not ??? or in the case that one is not ??? yes. ??? or in the case that one is not ??? or in the case that one is not ??? or in the case that one is not ??? or in the case that one is not ??? he does not in four, ??? or in the case that one is not ??? (in the case of a community offering) ??? or in the case that one is not ??? he does not (in the case of a community offering) ??? Rav Ashi said: ??? it is a single observance of its blood ??? he said ??? It is because of this: ??? he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Rav ??? Thus said Rabbi From the day ??? of ??? illumination. ??? Mar Zutra said: (BOOK TITLE 9) between next to ??? four hundred ??? It was taught: others say ??? is valid ??? is invalid, what is the difference here, ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree in the case of there is not in this case. ??? also All of it orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree in the case of there is not in this case.