PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סג,א גמרא

Let us say, They reason others It is not ??? except in the rear of ??? for he said: Raba ??? She It is a disagreement ??? No. ??? No. ??? Rabbah said No. In reality lit: In the world They reason others that is old ??? from the beginning and until the end of and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? in his heart ??? between ??? between ??? in his mouth ??? and not ??? to say ??? until ??? In this case, ??? of Rabbi Meir reasoned No. in the case of his mouth and his heart ??? And the rabbbis reason that in the case of his mouth and his heart ??? but his thought is R' Meir No. in the case of his mouth and his heart they agree They challenged this from a baraita: ??? to say terumah and he said tithe tithe and he said terumah or ??? enter ??? this and he said to this ??? benefit to this and he said to this did not say anything until ??? his mouth and his heart they agree except Abayye said: But the beginning of the teaching, for he said: One sign i.e., one of the two parts of the neck that need to be sliced in the same gesture ??? and the second sign Even ??? two also ??? of him. ??? at the end of the teaching, for he said: One sign i.e., one of the two parts of the neck that need to be sliced in the same gesture ??? the second sign ??? this one No. ??? of him. ??? and R' Meir with his reasoning for he said: ??? permits And the rabbbis ??? that they said yes. ??? permits

דף סג,א משנה

??? the Paschal offering on the chametz transgresses without shall you do R' Yehuda says: Even ??? Rabbi Shimon says: the Paschal offering ??? ten ??? he is liable or in the case that one is not ??? is exempt but the remainder of all ??? between ??? or whether that did not have ??? is exempt ??? is exempt that did not have ??? he is liable but the remainder of all ??? between ??? between that did not have ??? he is liable except for ??? that did not have ???

דף סג,א גמרא

Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish Resh Lakish said: In reality lit: In the world he is not liable until that it should be the chametz ??? or ???

דף סג,ב גמרא

or to one ??? and until that it should be with it in the courtyard R' Yochanan said: despite the fact that do not with it in the courtyard about what do they disagree? Shall I say the master of ??? what they disagree about of Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish Resh Lakish reasoned on ??? and Rabbi Yochanan reasoned No. in the case of on ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? of it one ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? a thangkgiving-offering within ??? except ??? No. nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice What then does it mean when it says except ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: except ??? the house of ??? but: except ??? made kiddush, and not in the case of on ??? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? he said even except ??? The Courtyard --- No. made kiddush, Perhaps, in the case of on ??? except ??? doubt whether what they disagree about In this case, also this one They disagreed about this, one ??? a loaf -- this refers to the day and he crossed the day and not ??? R' Yochanan and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? who both say he does not ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: he does not ??? It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected Is this not in which is not It once happened and all Is this not in which is not It once happened yes. ??? upon it but: ??? doubt whether her name ??? and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? he said he does not ??? It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? doubt whether ??? doubt whether No. her name ??? but: Is this not in which is not It once happened ??? upon it They said: In reality lit: In the world the master of ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was ??? in the matter of chametz then I might incorrectly say: ??? he for he says Rabbi Yochanan that is not in the case of on ??? It is because of this: which is a prohibition he and all in a case ??? but: in the matter of make kiddush. bread No. made kiddush, except inside I would say give thanks for him ??? son of ??? on ??? For if it was ??? made kiddush, If it was No. No. made kiddush, something ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements and if we had heard in the matter of make kiddush. bread ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? on ??? For if it was ??? made kiddush, If it was No. No. made kiddush, but: in the matter of chametz give thanks for him to Rabbi Yochanan that is not in the case of on ??? he and all in a case ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements Rav Oshaya: brought this very question ??? Ami he (??? ) does not have and he has to one ??? What then? He said to him: Is it written No. ??? on ??? (Ex. 34) No. ??? on chametz it is written He said to him: If so, even to one in the rear of the world. also He said to him: Scripture states: No. ??? and not ??? No. ??? on chametz ??? upon it It is because of this: No. ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? a priest ??? ??? transgresses without shall you do Because ??? are in the general category ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav ??? the Paschal offering on the chametz transgresses ??? when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case that he was ??? or ??? or to one ??? he was to one in the rear of the world. yes. ??? to him and one ??? and one ??? and one ??? he is liable but: ??? ??? ten he does not transgresses without anything We challenge that from the following baraita ??? the Paschal offering on the chametz transgresses without shall you do R' Yehuda says: Even ??? They said to him: Watch out for leading vav And they did not say except on Passover only. when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case in which there is ??? or ??? or to one ??? he was to one in the rear of the world. yes. ??? to him and one ??? and one ??? and one ??? and one ??? he is liable but: The fistful of a meal-offering the Minchah he does not transgresses without shall you do ??? ??? he does not transgresses without shall you do