PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13
Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.
Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits
This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.
This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."
I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף ז,א גמרא
??? immediately ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? is comparable Is this not ??? and he did not find ??? For Rav Gidal said that he said R' Chiyya son of Joseph Rav said ??? and onwards even ??? They do not concern ??? he did not find ??? for him and this was taught! he was who dwells in the House of Study: and he remembered in which there is chametz in the midst of his house ??? in his heart one Sabbath and one Yom Tov (holiday) This is satisfactory Sabbath It concerns itself For example, that falls four ten to be on Shabbat except Yom Tov (holiday) according to ??? he Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov Here in this case, ??? who dwells before his rabbi; is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) and he remembered in which there is ??? in the midst of his house ??? lest ??? for him ??? also where he teaches he was who dwells in the midst of the house of ??? "Hear!" ??? Rabbah said son of Rav Huna Rav said the bread ??? immediately ??? it is permitted. How so? Shall I say ??? of it ??? She For ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall except that is not ??? of it If it was chametz he If it was ??? he why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of For ??? even For No. ??? also ??? according to that was last who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: coins ??? before ??? livestock In reality lit: In the world tithe ??? the house Those who are ill in Jerusalem in the hour of ??? tithe in the remainder of ??? the year Those who are ill And Rav says son of heard him Zeira What is the reason? Because ??? Jerusalem ??? in all day Perhaps, ??? for him and Behold! ??? Here in this case, also, Let him say that came first that came first Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes and that one ??? he that I Here in this case, ??? If it was ??? For ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall Rabbah said No. you say ??? except I would say ??? my days: ??? If so, This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? is greater than What would you have said? immediately ??? is greater than ??? the validity ??? chametz ??? he Come and hear from this immediately ??? my days: ??? say all day and day bread ??? he baked ??? and who do we go? according to that was last and this was taught! R' Yosi son of Yehudah says ark ??? of it coins Those who are ill and coins tithe if most of Those who are ill Those who are ill if most of tithe tithe But why? ??? according to that was last Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? of it coins Those who are ill and coins tithe And there is no meaning to the word know whichever from them in the rear of Rav ??? he said For example, ??? of it ??? Rav Papa said, For example, ??? Rav Yehudah said ??? It is necessary for him ??? What does he say when he makes the blessing? Rav ??? he said in the name of Raba ??? chametz Rav Papa said, in the name of Raba on destruction of chametz ??? the whole world does not disagree ???
דף ז,ב גמרא
Because specifically, where they disagree is this: the master of burning one master reasons that from the beginning ??? They challenged him from this teaching: Blessed be who made us holy with His commandments and commanded us on ??? there i.e., in another mishna in what way does Let him say Let him say ??? No. ??? What is there to say? yes. Here, too, They challenged him from this teaching: Blessed be who made us holy with His commandments and commanded us on ??? there i.e., in another mishna also in what way does Let him say Let him say ??? No. ??? Passover and holy offerings What is there to say? yes. Here, too, They challenged him from this teaching: One who makes A lulav for himself he makes the blessing ??? to this time they brought to go out in it says who made us holy with His commandments and commanded us on ??? A lulav It is different there in that case ??? of him. If so, to go out in it he has fulfilled his obligation in it should bring himself yes. Here, too, but on account of that he came he is required ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? in a sukkah a Tanna taught: But the beginning of the teaching, also to go out in it it is taught at the end One who makes a sukkah for himself says Blessed are You, God. ??? to this time enter ??? of it says Blessed be who made us holy with His commandments and commanded us ??? in a sukkah And the halacha is according to the opinion on destruction of chametz everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world from this from the beginning in the case of ??? From where do we derive this? for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said all the commandments. he makes the blessing about them transgresses ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? That this transgresses ??? he he said ??? son of Isaac For scripture said: (II Sam 18) ??? a way the plain ??? ??? Abaye said from here (Gen. 33) This is only in the case he crossed before them ??? from here (Micah 2) ??? before them And Hashem ??? among Rav They said: except for ??? and shofar This is satisfactory immersion ??? a person No. Look, except shofar What is the reason מאי טעמא And if you say It is because of this: perhaps, ??? If so, even ??? also except Rav Chisdah said except for ??? only. it was said: Another teaching is like this: he immersed He ascended ??? says Blessed be who made us holy with His commandments and commanded us on ??? by the light of a lamp ??? From where do we derive this? Rav Chisdah said we have learned a lost object ??? and a lost object ??? a lost object ??? It is written here (Ex. 12) seven days sourdough No. he shall find ??? And it is written there (Gen. 44) ??? in the case of a child. a bride and he shall find and a lost object ??? that are his ??? As it is written (Zeph. 1) In an hour of this particular ??? Jerusalem ??? As it is written (Prov. 20) lamp God, ??? a person ??? all ??? a Tanna taught: of the academy of R' Yishmael on the night of ??? the chametz by the light of a lamp even though there isn't proof for the matter there is an allusion to the matter as it is said seven days sourdough No. he shall find And it is said: ??? in the case of a child. a bride And it is said: In an hour of this particular ??? Jerusalem ??? And it is said: lamp God, ??? a person ??? Why "And it is said"? I.e., why do I need both prooftexts? And if you say This In an hour of this particular ??? he for he says the Merciful One No. I examine to it in Jerusalem ??? light ??? except ??? light ??? Rabbah ??? and iniquity ??? No. ??? Come and hear: lamp Hashem ??? The rabbis taught: yes. they examine No. ??? the sun and not ??? and not ??? except by the light of a lamp
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.