PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ע,א גמרא

Is this not guilt-obligation She For if it was You might have thought guilt-obligation She ??? on Shabbat ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא We come to compare As it is taught: ??? with the Paschal offering ??? so that that it should be Passover is eaten on ??? for two days ??? that is not ??? you say as it is taught: son of you say says ??? with the Paschal offering Behold! She ??? It is not ??? except for a day and a night ??? five ten ??? for two days and one night ??? four ten he would exit of it It is because of this: happiness And there is no meaning to the word he would exit of it It is because of this: ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? you say ??? Rav ??? the son of (Ex. 34) and not ??? to visit zevach-offering the Holiday of Sukkot the Paschal offering zevach-offering the Holiday of Sukkot this ??? the Paschal offering ??? and the Merciful One in the Torah says No. ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? you say ??? prayed or yes. ??? prayed For ??? the Merciful One ??? but: ??? No. or perhaps, there is no difference Come and hear: the night. ??? all of it prayed and Rav Chisdah said these are the words of son of you say Learn from this They posed this difficulty: ??? you say she entered from the morning or It is not she entered from the morning she entered from ??? or It is not she entered from ??? she entered the daughter of two two or It is not she entered the daughter of two two For ??? the Merciful One ??? but: for all words No. or perhaps, there is no difference Come and hear: ??? with the Paschal offering Behold! She ??? she entered from ??? It is not she entered from the morning she entered from ??? It is not she entered from ??? she entered the daughter of ??? It is not she entered the daughter of two two It is not ??? except for a day and a night It is not ??? except prayed It is not ??? except by those in its "minyan" one ??? for him is what he has This reason out the logic. son of you say Learn from this all of them the validity in the case of Learn from this They posed this difficulty: ??? you say there is It is because of this: ??? or there is not there It is because of this: ??? even though and so when ??? the Merciful One ??? Scripture states: in it in it and not ??? or perhaps, This in it ??? and not ??? he who has arrived Come and hear: ??? ten ??? of it immediately in a case where there are three ten he learns Mishna ??? between in this or whether in this he learns Mishna ??? with whom does it agree? Shall I say rabbis what is the difference here, ??? also this one Look, ??? except Is this not ??? you say She And learn from this there is It is because of this: ??? No. In reality lit: In the world rabbis For example, on Shabbat came Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, ??? four ten to be on Shabbat ??? of it immediately and on the fifteenth ??? of it immediately ??? Behold! She ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching Is this not on Shabbat is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) So rather,

דף ע,ב גמרא

??? So rather, ??? came the end of the end of ??? begins ??? Shall I say ??? in a case where there are three ten ??? why do I have ??? So rather, ??? ten what is the difference here, ??? and what is the difference here, ??? that is not ??? to it it is not necessary to teach this ??? in a case where there are three ten ??? doubt ??? to it ??? No. ??? to it It was taught: Yehudah son of ??? he ??? his son he has walked and he sat to him ??? he said if ??? Elijah and he said to them to Israel On account of what No. ??? on Shabbat Just as there are. say to him ??? on two ??? ??? heard him that are the sages ??? And they did not say to them to Israel ??? the Sabbath Rav said What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? As it is written (in Deut. 16) ??? Passover to Hashem ??? and mornings Is it not the case that yes. Passover except from ??? and from ??? except ??? this Passover mornings -- this refers to ??? and the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? Passover Thus said Rabbi ??? and We The reason is ??? except he read ??? he who has arrived for he said: Rav ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah ??? the Paschal offering ??? peace-offerings as it is said ??? Passover to Hashem ??? and mornings And so Passover from the morning came Is it not the case that yes. Passover came except from ??? and from ??? except is permitted. the Paschal offering ??? for a matter of that comes from ??? and from the morning And the rabbbis What is the reason מאי טעמא No. ??? Sabbath this one certainly sacrifice ??? he Thus said Rabbi ??? It is because of this: Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 23) ??? that specific the Holiday of Sukkot to Hashem seven days in the year seven ??? are they, except from here ??? that is not ??? the Sabbath For he came ??? he said Watch out for leading vav And I said before ??? occasions ??? you "one who finds" except Six For example, that falls ??? of the Holiday of Sukkot on Shabbat Abayye said: Avin: ??? Let us say, This is like the validity eight No. It concerns itself A general principle: seven ??? two Ulla said Rabbi Eliezer said peace-offerings ??? est ??? he does not he would exit of them No. It is because of this: happiness and not It is because of this: ??? It is because of this: happiness As it is written (Deut. 27) ??? in the case of ???