PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עא,א גמרא

in the hour of happiness there is not in this case. It is because of this: ??? you shall a thing ??? and any thing thing ??? he does not came except from ??? Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: (in Deut. 16) you have been ??? rejoices ??? on the night of ??? You say on the night of ??? Or perhaps, except on the night of the first Yom Tov Therefore, scripture states: ??? a portion What is the reason מאי טעמא Is this not It is because of this: ??? to him a bamah an elevated place for offerings. shall rejoice No. ??? The reason is Just as you see ??? on the night of Yom Tov (holiday) ??? and to discharge the mitzvah on the night of Yom Tov (holiday) ??? I on the night of Yom Tov (holiday) ??? in which there is happiness before him and sends forth I on the night of Yom Tov (holiday) ??? that do not happiness before him Rav Yosef challenged this by citing ??? four ten he would exit of it It is because of this: happiness And there is no meaning to the word he would exit of it It is because of this: ??? why is it that this one in the case of ??? in the hour of happiness there is not in this case. Rav said Idi bar Avin ??? and it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it Rav Ashi said Here, too, ??? For if it was No. you say thus this one ??? one The tanna teaches: to it son of you say son of you say this one ??? to it Watch out for leading vav !! or by sitting overnight, Learn from this He challenged this "He" meaning... Raba the Hallel ??? eight And if you say in the case of ??? in the hour of happiness this one There were times when ??? that is not It concerns itself except seven For example, that falls ??? to be on Shabbat Thus said Rabbi ??? the son of of Rav Yehudah gladden him ??? Rabba said: two ??? In the matter one ??? they are eaten prayed yes. they are eaten and happiness ??? there is not in this case. And furthermore, priests they eat and a Jew lit, Israel a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? except Thus said Rabbi ??? gladden him ??? and wine sleeping For he came ??? R' Elazar said peace-offerings ??? from the eve of Yom Tov (holiday) he would exit of them It is because of this: happiness And there is no meaning to the word he would exit of them It is because of this: ??? he would exit It is because of this: happiness No. in the case of ??? in the hour of happiness and not It is because of this: ??? you shall a thing ??? and any thing thing ??? he does not came except from ??? They challenged him from this teaching: you have been ??? rejoices ??? on the night of Yom Tov (holiday) ??? You say ??? on the night of Yom Tov (holiday) ??? Or perhaps, except ??? on the night of the first Yom Tov Therefore, scripture states: ??? a portion What is the reason? Is this not It is because of this: ??? to him a bamah an elevated place for offerings. shall rejoice No. As it is taught: Just as you see ??? on the night of Yom Tov (holiday) ??? and to discharge the mitzvah on the night of the first Yom Tov ??? I on the night of Yom Tov (holiday) ??? in which there is happiness before him and sends forth I on the night of the first Yom Tov that do not happiness before him Rav said ??? from where do we learn ??? five ten ??? Watch out for leading vav !! or by sitting overnight, as it is said (Ex. 23) and not ??? milk ??? until mornings and right next lit: and leaning for him ??? This comes to imply That this mornings mornings ??? Rav Yosef disagreed The reason is ??? this one it is not written: ??? then I might incorrectly say: What then does it mean when it says mornings mornings two who that it is possible something ??? for him From twilight ??? until daybreak Abaye said to him: Why is it that No. Consider this case: Passover to Rabbi ??? son of ??? for him ??? until daybreak Rabba said: Rav Yosef thus ??? has a problem who that it is possible something ??? a Tanna taught: ??? it does not require ??? and Rav Kahana ??? he is required ??? Who is it as it is taught: (in Deut. 16) No. ??? from ??? who ??? in the evening, by day ??? to visit

דף עא,ב גמרא

??? on ??? for two days and one night Or perhaps, except for a day and a night For as it says: (in Deut. 16) by day ??? Behold! mornings two say Or perhaps, except mornings ??? for just as I is fulfilled lit. is stood up ??? for two days and one night except ??? For as it says: in it (Lev. 7) if ??? or ??? on ??? days and night ??? Mar said: Or perhaps, except mornings ??? this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? For as it says: by day ??? Behold! mornings two say This is what he means: Or perhaps, except ??? is what the scripture says. One ??? and one ??? -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to ??? he returns he said except ??? for two days and one night If so, if ??? or ??? in what way If it was ??? this one it is written of it day and night If it was ??? this one it is written of it day and night except This ??? completely he read ??? on ??? for two days and one night The reason is As it is written by day ??? to visit produce that may or may not have been properly tithed mornings mornings two this one all in a case As it is written mornings ??? mornings ??? and even though that is not the writing of of him. ???

דף עא,ב משנה

the Paschal offering ??? that did not have ??? on Shabbat he is liable upon it A sin-offering but the remainder of all ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover if are not ??? he is liable and if ??? there are. Rabbi Eliezer he is obligated A sin-offering and R' Yehoshua exempts He said to him R' Eliezer Just as if the Paschal offering that he was is permitted. ??? was his name he is liable offerings? that are are forbidden ??? oil is it not logical that it should be he is liable He said to him R' Yehoshua No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? on Passover ??? In the matter is forbidden shall you say ??? In the matter ??? He said to him ??? The offal of ??? that are are permitted ??? he is liable He said to him R' Yehoshua No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? in which they have ??? shall you say on Passover that do not to him ??? Rabbi Meir says: Even ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of The offal of ??? is exempt ??? that did not have ??? or in the case that one is not by those in its "minyan" ??? he is liable ??? or in the case that one is not ??? by those in its "minyan" or in the case that one is not by those in its "minyan" ??? is exempt ??? and it is found the master of ??? he is liable ??? and it is found ??? is exempt ??? ??? or ??? or ??? is exempt because of ???