PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עב,א גמרא

with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? except ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, but the remainder of all ??? the Paschal offering if are not ??? he is liable if ??? there are. R' Eliezer he is obligated A sin-offering and R' Yehoshua exempts and if ??? What do I have to learn from ??? What do I have to learn from those that are not ??? except This is obvious! ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, ??? Thus said Rabbi Avin: yes. But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, ??? he found Rav Isaac bar Joseph to R' ??? he arises ??? He said to him Our mishna What then does it mean when it says He said to him But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, ??? a Tanna taught: of him ??? Oftentimes he is equivalent. for him like who ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: Thus said Rabbi Eliezer Just as if Passover when it is permitted ??? was his name he is liable offerings? that are are forbidden ??? oil is it not logical that it should be he is liable and if ??? this one No. he is equivalent. that at the beginning of the teaching ??? and at the end of the teaching, ??? to R' Eliezer No. two for him to R' Joshua ??? for him ??? for him thus thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him To me No. he is equivalent. But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, ??? No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? on Passover ??? was his name for a matter of ??? shall you say ??? oil for a matter of ??? He said to him Rabbi Eliezer The offal of ??? that are are permitted ??? he is liable He said to him: Rabbi Yehoshua No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? which provides there is regarding them ??? shall you say on Passover that do not to him ??? This comes to imply ??? in a case is what he has ??? he is obligated Rabbi Yehoshua Consider this case: ??? to them ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: who that were to him two ??? one ??? after the Sabbath and one ??? on Shabbat and forgot ??? of after the Sabbath on Shabbat he is liable one ??? on the eve of the Sabbath. and one ??? on Shabbat and forgot ??? of ??? on Shabbat Rabbi Eliezer he is obligated A sin-offering and R' Yehoshua exempts Rav Ami said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? of the eve of the Shabbat on Shabbat That there are ??? of him. Here in this case, For example, ??? If so, Rabbi Meir says: Even ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of The offal of ??? is exempt even though ??? For it was taught: Rabbi Chiyya ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? No. ??? R' Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua on that were to him two ??? one ??? the eve of the Shabbat and one ??? on Shabbat and forgot ??? of the eve of the Shabbat on Shabbat ??? on Just as ??? on that were to him two ??? one ??? after the Sabbath and one ??? on Shabbat and forgot ??? of after the Sabbath on Shabbat of Rabbi Eliezer he is obligated A sin-offering and R' Yehoshua exempts ??? Just as there i.e., in another mishna that is not does he act? a commandment he exempted Rabbi Yehoshua in a case that he came does he act? a commandment he is obligated They said: of the academy of Rabbi ??? But the beginning of the teaching, For example, ??? of Sabbath on the eve of the Sabbaths

דף עב,ב גמרא

that did not have it was given Sabbath ??? it was given Sabbath ??? Here in this case, Behold! it was given Sabbath ??? next to sacrifice ??? Rav Ashi said to him for Rav, ??? Here in this case, also, Behold! it was given Sabbath ??? next to ??? of the world He said to him to join with the body of That this a person Regardless, No. ??? but the remainder of all ??? Passover if are not ??? he is liable and if ??? Rabbi Eliezer he is obligated A sin-offering and Rabbi Yehoshua ??? Which Tanna taught: ??? for him between ??? R' Shimon She as it is taught: one ??? and one offerings? those that are not ??? and thus ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of The offal of ??? is exempt These are the words of R' Meir Thus said Rabbi Shimon No. ??? Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua on those that are not ??? on Just as ??? on ??? for Rabbi Eliezer he is obligated A sin-offering and Rabbi Yehoshua exempts Rav said ??? Rabbi Eliezer said exempts he was Rabbi Meir Even if ??? of ??? peace-offerings ??? the Paschal offering Rabbi Zeira said to him: for Rav, ??? For didn't Rabbi Yochanan say give thanks he was Rabbi Meir ??? He said to him ??? he is not agitated. in them? and that one agitated of him. Raba brought this very question ??? Those who are ill ??? Passover What then does it mean when it says for me Thus said Rabbi ??? He said to him: exempts he was R' Meir even Those who are ill ??? Passover ??? Yochanan give thanks he was ??? No. ??? Behold! ??? and the reason of Rabbi ??? It is because of this: ??? and not ??? For didn't Rav Bibi say R' Elazar said exempts he was R' Meir Even if ??? of ??? peace-offerings ??? the Paschal offering Perhaps, The reason is of Rabbi Meir It is because of this: ??? He said to him agitated even though that is not ??? even though that is not agitated To exclude ??? that is not ??? and not ??? agitated ??? R' Zeira And Rabbi Shmuel son of Rav Isaac ??? For R' Shmuel son of Rav Isaac ??? They said: R' Shimon ben Lakish (Resh Lakish) said ??? to him ??? of notar ??? of prayed and he ate he is liable And R' Yochanan said: his wife a menstruant the master of he is liable ??? a menstruant the master of is exempt that it is possible that they said how much more so ??? that is not One who acts a commandment ??? that they said ??? is exempt What is the reason? there i.e., in another mishna he ??? But here, in this case, that is not ??? No. and R' Yochanan what is the difference here, ??? that he came does he act? a commandment his wife also ??? does he act? a commandment ??? preganant And this is present here. ??? answer that did not have in the hour of ??? For didn't Raba say a person is required ??? his wife In the matter a commandment immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? If so, Even if ??? also ??? his wife No. ??? and R' Yochanan like who Shall I say like Rabbi Yosi For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Yosei says: the first Yom Tov of the Holiday of Sukkot that falls to be on Shabbat and forgot ??? a lulav to the public thoroughfare is exempt because of ??? perhaps, It is different there in that case ??? So rather, Rabbi Yehoshua ??? perhaps, there i.e., in another mishna also its time ??? So rather, like Rabbi Joshua ??? there i.e., in another mishna also its time ??? So rather, like Rabbi Joshua ??? For it was taught in a baraita he was he eats from terumah ??? that he was son of a divorcee or son of Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah Rabbi Eliezer he is obligated the principal amount plus a fifth R' Yehoshua exempts perhaps, Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? son of Abaye for he said: Rav Bibi son of Abaye from terumah On the eve of Pesach ??? So, too, that I terumah ??? the blessing of the Service and the blessing of the Service the Merciful One ??? For it was taught in a baraita He was standing ??? that he was son of a divorcee or son of Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah all ??? all of them ??? atop the altar of ??? and R' Yehoshua considers it proper say What is the reason מאי טעמא of R' Yehoshua As it is written (Deut. 33) he blesses Hashem ??? his hands ??? and terumah in a case ??? the blessing of the Service as it is taught: It once happened ??? that did not have came ??? they found Rabban Gamliel He said to him: On account of what No. ??? to the house of study He said to him: the blessing of the Service ??? He said to him: all ??? are not except these are the words of ??? And so the blessing of the Service in these times (nowadays) from where do we learn He said to him: Behold! he says