PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עג,א גמרא

(in Numbers 18) ??? gifts ??? ??? they make ??? terumah in the borderlands ??? that did not have ??? This is obvious! immediately for in that place is invalid, Here in this case, he is liable It is because of this: ??? at the end of the teaching, is exempt a Tanna taught: But the beginning of the teaching, he is liable and Here, too, This is obvious! It is because of this: for in that place is valid Here in this case, is exempt except ??? that did not have ??? on Shabbat a Tanna taught: also that did not have ??? but it Back to the main body of the text: why do I have It is because of this: ??? R' Eliezer and R' Yehoshua He said to him Rav Huna son of ??? For ??? in front of Rabbi Zerika he is required of him according to the words of One who says ??? is exempt ??? that did not have ??? he is liable Just as ??? If they ascended, they did not descend ??? and it is found the master of ??? he is liable Just as ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? ??? for he said: If they ascended, they did not descend ??? and it is found ??? is exempt this one ??? he is liable Just as ??? to discharge the mitzvah something roadkill He disagreed with this Ravina this one that teaches ??? A sin-offering on Shabbat outside ??? he is liable upon it three sin-offerings Just as ??? Rav said ??? something ??? from ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Rav said a guilt-offering ??? is valid ??? Perhaps, his reasoning is it does not require ??? For No. ??? also ??? after atonement because before atonement ??? For it was taught in a baraita a guilt-offering ??? or ??? until ??? "and he sold ??? R' Eliezer says: ??? R' Yehoshua says he shall sell ??? an elevation-offering ??? yes. but: ??? No. ??? after atonement because before atonement Learn from this ??? Rav Chisda to Rav Huna. ??? ??? and etc.

דף עג,ב גמרא

It was taught by He ascended ??? For This ??? immediately If you say, This is satisfactory he is required ??? This Passover he And because of the fact the one who does not have ??? it was. for him ??? immediately except If you say, it does not require ??? it was. for him peace-offerings ??? It is because of this: What then does it mean when it says It is because of this: Another thing: that he came ??? for him after The Tamid-offering of twilight ??? an image he is required as it is taught: This is the general rule: all ??? immediately with blood ??? and went out ??? except No. you say ??? is valid ??? an elevation-offering except I would say ??? an elevation-offering is valid Perhaps, he is required ??? and to Rebbi Chiyya son of ??? for he said: ??? They said: For example, that were ??? the dead ??? two This he who seeks ??? this one in reality it does not require ??? What is there to say? except Rav Huna said the son of of Rav Joshua Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? before ??? and they died? ??? after ??? that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? and all ??? for the remainder he does not return ??? something he The reason is except for Rav, this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Rav ??? life, ??? except Rav Pappa said: So, with whom does it agree? R' Eliezer She for he said: and thus ??? others for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover is invalid, that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? and if Rabbi Eliezer She A sin-offering also he is obligated for it is the case that he does not have ??? In the matter a commandment is exempt except ??? Rav Yosef the son of of Rav Sala the Chasid: in front of Rav ??? So, with whom does it agree? Joseph son of ??? She For it was taught in a baraita Joseph son of ??? says ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover and for the sake of a sin-offering. ??? Perhaps, ??? She but on account of thus ??? immediately ??? derive it ??? Joshua Rav Ashi said: Rav for he said: ??? Yishmael his son of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah as it is taught: R' Yishmael his son of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah says if there are ??? by day ??? if ??? ??? or ??? or ??? he is liable ??? and he goes out ??? What is the reason? Is this not It is because of this: that is not he is required ??? From where can you derive perhaps, It is because of this: ??? to it ??? of the academy of Rabbah son of Avuah for he said: even an invalidating act nevertheless also he is required ??? an image ??? iniquity iniquity ??? For if it was No. you say thus ??? What is there to say? this one and So if he wished, ??? for he said: Rabbi Chiyya son of ??? For example, that were ??? did he die ??? two except ??? from the beginning Joseph son of ??? She