PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עו,א גמרא

is forbidden ??? the words of all are is permitted. ??? Rav said: ??? And Shmuel said ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? on ??? and he returned ??? wash ??? You might have thought ??? This is satisfactory for Rav, for he said: ??? It is because of this: thus wash ??? for him ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had pottery ??? for him ??? And so he returns ??? Passover ??? and the Merciful One he said (Ex. 12) prayed fire and not prayed ??? Another thing: except ??? for he said: ??? pottery immediately ??? he ??? for him ??? why is it that wash ??? Like that which was said by Rabbi ??? Shmuel said ??? Here in this case, also, ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? on ??? ??? You might have thought ??? This is satisfactory for Rav, for he said: ??? It is because of this: thus ??? ??? to it ??? for him for him ??? and the Merciful One he said prayed fire and not prayed ??? Another thing: except ??? for he said: ??? immediately ??? She ??? for him why do I have ??? ??? for him ??? ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Shmuel said ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? with oil of terumah if ??? priests ??? if of Israel if ??? he ??? if prayed he ??? ??? This is satisfactory for Rav, for he said: ??? for him ??? It is because of this: ??? he except ??? for he said: ??? immediately ??? he ??? why is it that ??? for him ??? that I ??? in reality he ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Shmuel ??? is forbidden and thus ??? is forbidden ??? ??? immediately ??? he ??? for him it would be impossible that is not ??? from this ??? except I would say ??? Another teaching meat ??? milk ??? and thus ??? is forbidden ??? ??? immediately ??? he ??? for him it would be impossible that is not ??? from this ??? except I would say ??? Mar said: ??? Rav Huna said They did not teach such a ruling except that did not have ??? but: ??? is forbidden for Shmuel said: that is salted Behold! he ??? Behold! he ??? Rabba said: Hey, isn't it the case that Shmuel said: that is salted Behold! he ??? They did not say that except in a case that did not have is eaten ??? but: is eaten ??? No. This certain individual son of ??? Rav ??? the son of of Raba ??? Rabba said: one ??? the validity This is like If it was Is this not Rav ??? the son of of Raba ??? Rabbah he He could say to you For Shmuel said that is salted Behold! he ??? that do not is eaten ??? This is eaten ??? and what case is he dealing with? ??? but: prayed he is required ??? They did not say that except in a case ??? of him. ??? but: is in it ??? is forbidden and if ??? is forbidden Rav said

דף עו,ב גמרא

meat ??? oil ??? with meat roadkill ??? is forbidden What is the reason? ??? and Levi said even meat ??? with meat roadkill oil is permitted. What is the reason? the scent ??? in reality he and the scent ??? Is this not the validity She does he act? Levi ??? the house of the exilarch ??? and Another thing: They challenged him from this teaching: yes. ??? two Paschal offerings ??? because of ??? Is this not ??? it is a problem ??? No. because of ??? Here, too, ??? When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, even ??? If you say, This is satisfactory because of ??? we were where he teaches Even if ??? except If you say, because of ??? What do I have to learn from ??? What do I have to learn from ??? Rather, what can we conclude? on ??? because of ??? he ??? but: ??? Sarai Let us say, ??? of Rav he said Rabbi ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? You might have thought except I would say similar to two ??? and thus he comes to say yes. ??? two Paschal offerings ??? because of ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? And even if similar to two ??? is forbidden It is because of this: ??? and even ??? Rav said ??? bread the sun it was given ??? wine of terumah ??? And Rabbi Yehudah permits and Rabbi Yosei, permits ??? because of ??? Is this not ??? She ??? reasoned the scent ??? Is this not the validity She and one master reasons that the scent ??? the validity She ??? certainly ??? She for Rav, Let him say ??? She Rav would say to you everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world the scent ??? the validity She Is this not it was said: He ascended ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said Raysh Lakish said ??? the sun ??? the words of all are is forbidden ??? the words of all are is permitted. No. ??? except ??? the sun ??? bread ??? and Here, too, ??? the sun ??? is comparable Watch out for leading vav For Rav learned: ??? the son of of Rav ??? elder bread ??? with prayed ??? is forbidden ??? this particular ??? Raba ??? Master, son of Rav Ashi said: Even if ??? also forbidden It is because of this: ??? and to a different matter

דף עו,ב משנה

five items have come ??? and are not they are eaten ??? and two ??? and bread ??? and peace-offerings of community and male goats of the beginnings of months the Paschal offering ??? came is eaten ??? that did not have came ??? except as regard to eating,

דף עו,ב גמרא

five ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? five ten ??? I thought to say immediately ??? he ??? for him festival ??? Come and hear from this immediately is what he has restitution all seven No. ??? Sabbath ??? No. ??? No. ??? also male goats of ??? But hey, wasn't this already taught elsewhere peace-offerings of community If so, male goats of the beginnings of months also No. ??? for it is the case that a Tanna taught: peace-offerings of community They said: