PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עז,א גמרא

male goats of the beginnings of months ??? for him You might have thought that I would say that this one No. it is written in them? festival Come and learn from this. ??? new ??? festival ??? for Abaye said: ??? That this and now ??? As it is written (Lam. 1) he read by the festival ??? This comes to imply ??? they came ??? words For the Rabbis taught (Lev. 23) And he said Moses ??? Hashem Just as Therefore, scripture states: on account of that did not have we have learned except ??? Passover as it is said in them? ??? and even on Shabbat ??? and even ??? the remainder of ??? as it is said (Num. 29) ??? to Hashem ??? with it two ??? Scripture states: And he said Moses ??? Hashem to the Children of Israel the scripture ??? festival one for all of them and all Behold! why do I have It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: The Tamid-offering then I might incorrectly say: The Tamid-offering which provides ??? but: Passover No. Come and learn from this. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: Passover Passover that he was ??? he is spiritually cut off but: The Tamid-offering ??? he is spiritually cut off I would say No. Come and learn from this. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: Behold! both then I might incorrectly say: Behold! he there are of them trapping of a donkey The Tamid-offering ??? Passover that he was ??? he is spiritually cut off but: the remainder of ??? I would say it is not written: the Merciful One ??? to Hashem ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? to Hashem ??? then I might incorrectly say: the remainder of ??? those who are coming back ??? but: ??? and two ??? have come ??? except ??? in reality ??? No. Come and learn from this. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and two ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? and two ??? but: ??? No. Come and learn from this. ??? the World: ??? She (in the case of a community offering) ??? a Tanna taught: ??? for him for he said: ??? (in the case of a community offering) except Rabbi Yehudah as it is taught: ??? between ??? on ??? or whether that is not on ??? these are the words of Rabbi Shimon R' Yehuda says: ??? on ??? yes. ??? on ??? he does not ??? He said to him: Rabbi Shimon the high priest by day ??? He corrects that is not on ??? He said to him: ??? and Yom Kippur ??? (in the case of a community offering) from this general principle it would follow ??? reasoned ??? She (in the case of a community offering) And everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world yes. ??? on ??? a Tanna taught: ??? for him for he said: ??? on ??? except ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Eliezer says ??? on ??? Rabbi Yosei says: yes. ??? on ??? Let him say Our mishna that is not like Rabbi Joshua as it is taught: (Deut. 12) and You did ??? and the blood Rabbi Yehoshua says: if yes. blood yes. meat if yes. meat yes. blood Rabbi Eliezer says: blood even though that do not meat as it is said (Deut. 12) ??? for just as I is fulfilled lit. is stood up and You did ??? and the blood to say to you Just as blood Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified Even meat Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified you shall says ??? a child there are between ??? and Rabbi Yehoshua also it is written ??? He could say to you this one it is written ??? It may be eaten

דף עז,ב גמרא

and Behold! two ??? why do I have one the case is that of an elevation-offering, and one ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: the case is that of an elevation-offering, then I might incorrectly say: an elevation-offering She ??? which provides ??? but: peace-offerings that is not ??? I would say No. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: peace-offerings then I might incorrectly say: ??? for there is in them? two ??? but: an elevation-offering ??? of it two ??? I would say No. Come and learn from this. and R' Eliezer also it is written ??? It may be eaten He could say to you This certain individual should bring himself that do not ??? is permitted. in cases regarding eating until ??? the blood If so, I would say completely ??? he who has arrived blood despite the fact that do not in that place meat From where do we derive this? He could say to you If so, ??? the Merciful One ??? It may be eaten and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? as it is written ??? (Deut. 12) and You did ??? and the blood what is the difference here, ??? Learn from this blood despite the fact that do not meat And learn from this that do not ??? is permitted. in cases regarding eating until ??? the blood and R' Yehoshua yes. ??? is permitted. in cases regarding eating until ??? the blood ??? he for just as ??? and so when ??? No. ??? For ??? blood and so when ??? is essential. For ??? is it not all the more so? ??? and Rabbi Eliezer the validity That it comes ??? "and the writing of to it he read and R' Yehoshua all in a case That there are Watch out for leading vav !! but for midrash, ??? now Let us say, ??? that is not like Rabbi Joshua ??? for he said: in the case of both ??? No. ??? in what way does will come ??? even you say Rabbi Yehoshua except his reasoning is Rabbi Yehoshua ??? on ??? this one this accounts offerings? That there are we go up except ??? and two ??? we go up What is there to say? They said: For Rabbi Yehoshua said: also ??? both ??? did not say ??? did not say For it was taught in a mishna: ??? he loses it ??? Rabbi Eliezer ??? Rabbi Yehoshua is invalid ??? and not ??? Rabbi Yehoshua ??? both and not ??? Rabbi Yehoshua For this Rabbi Yehoshua ??? he said ??? did not say And even This a Tanna taught: reasoned even ??? This a Tanna taught: and it was standing ??? of him And furthermore, It was taught: R' Yosi said one who sees I these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehoshua ??? these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer ??? that he was says blood even though that do not in that place meat these are the words of Rabbi Yehoshua ??? that he was says if yes. blood yes. meat if yes. meat yes. blood these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer ??? that he was says the accompanying handful of flour even though that do not ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehoshua ??? that he was says if yes. the accompanying handful of flour yes. ??? if yes. ??? yes. the accompanying handful of flour except his reasoning is Rabbi Yehoshua ??? on ??? If so, why is it that ??? Rabbi Yehoshua is invalid ??? except ??? for one The tanna teaches: to Rabbi Eliezer This is obvious! now there are to say that which is lost or burnt up ??? considers it proper Rabbi Eliezer ??? except This is obvious! to Rabbi Joshua And we have learned is invalid And furthermore, It was taught: Rabbi Yehoshua says: all offerings? ??? between that became tamei, meat and milk stood i.e., as long as he lived or whether that became tamei, milk meat stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? the blood but: ??? No. Perhaps, his reasoning is Rabbi Yehoshua yes. ??? on ??? and not on ??? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, Rabbi Yehoshua She ??? And there is no difficulty. here, initially here, once it has been done For Rabbi Yehoshua said: initially once it has been done No. ??? for him to Rabbi Joshua between initially ??? as it is taught: ??? meat or ??? or that went out except ??? Rabbi Eliezer says ??? R' Yehoshua says No. ??? give thanks R' Yehoshua ??? In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? one ??? once it has been done ??? And furthermore, five items have come initially ???