PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עח,א גמרא

except There is no difficulty. here, privately here, (in the case of a community offering) Let him say ??? that is not like R' Yosi as it is taught: Rabbi Eliezer says ??? on ??? Rabbi Yosei says: yes. ??? on ??? R' Yosi yes. ??? on ??? Joshua he reasons, for he said: in the case of both Let him say now ??? that is not like R' Yosi No. Rabbi Yosei ??? he reasons, for he said: blood despite the fact that do not meat If so, for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion yes. ??? on ??? for he said: ??? immediately for he said: blood even though that do not meat ??? on ??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion except ??? and remove the offering from the status lit: hands of the laws of misappropriation. what they disagree about Rabbi Eliezer reasoned ??? for him ??? fixed for him ??? for him something the laws of misappropriation of sacred things and R' Yosi reasoned No. ??? and not ??? for him ??? and not fixed for him ??? and not ??? for him something the laws of misappropriation of sacred things He disagreed with this Rav ??? also of R' Yosi reasoned ??? This is satisfactory offerings? that it is possible blood ??? also that it is possible the accompanying handful of flour bread ??? also that it is possible ??? except two ??? What is there to say? And if you say ??? with them we were ??? If so, are they, them four and We five We have learnt in a Mishna: except his reasoning is Rabbi Yosei ??? (in the case of a community offering) and this was taught! One of these and one of these ??? upon it all seven from all sin-offerings that were in that place these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rabbi Yosei says: yes. ??? upon it except the third ??? only. and if You might have thought his reasoning is Rabbi Yosei ??? (in the case of a community offering) why do I have ??? A general principle: except ??? that is not like Rabbi Yosi He said to him Rav ??? and Rabbi Yosei, ??? my heart two he as it is taught: R' Yosi said one who sees I these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehoshua ??? these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehoshua ??? these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer ??? that he was says blood despite the fact that do not meat these are the words of Rabbi Yehoshua ??? that he was says if yes. blood yes. meat if yes. meat yes. blood these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer ??? that he was says the accompanying handful of flour despite the fact that do not in that place ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehoshua ??? that he was says if there is not there ??? yes. the accompanying handful of flour if yes. the accompanying handful of flour yes. ??? He said to him ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: For he arises ??? he said ??? so that thus it will be ??? also ??? he arises ??? he said ??? so that thus it will be ??? also ??? He said to him ??? For he arises ??? he said ??? so that thus it will be ??? also ??? For are written ??? are written except For he arises ??? and he said ??? so that thus it will be ??? also ??? Hey, isn't it the case that the essence ??? he ??? except There is no difficulty. one who sees I --- these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer. ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehoshua ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא It is because of this: ??? this one ??? for him to Rabbi Yosei: for he said: yes. ??? on ??? except There is no difficulty. one who sees I these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer (in the case of a community offering) one who sees I these are the words of Rabbi Yehoshua privately (in the case of a community offering) What is the reason מאי טעמא It is because of this: ??? (in the case of a community offering) one ??? for him to R' ??? for he said: ??? She (in the case of a community offering) And furthermore, If it was (in the case of a community offering) Rabbi Eliezer considers it proper and not Rabbi Yehoshua

דף עח,ב גמרא

this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? (in the case of a community offering) even Rabbi Yehoshua give thanks except one who sees I these are the words of ??? these are the words of R' Yehoshua initially once it has been done even Rabbi Yehoshua also give thanks he where he teaches abbi Yehoshua acknowledges ??? In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? this one ??? this one ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: abbi Yehoshua acknowledges ??? In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? but: ??? No. and thus he comes to say R' Yosi one who sees I these are the words of ???

דף עח,ב משנה

??? meat and milk stood i.e., as long as he lived he does not ??? the blood ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? the blood ??? is not thus except despite the fact that became tamei, ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? the blood

דף עח,ב גמרא

Rav Gidel said that Rav said if In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? Hey, isn't it the case that in the case of food food is not essential Hey, isn't it the case that it is written (Ex. 12) a man on account of he ate ??? No. For it was taught: (Ex. 12) ??? This teaches that do not the Paschal offering ??? except by those in its "minyan" It is possible ??? that did not have by those in its "minyan" ??? on the Commandment and is valid Scripture states: a man on account of he ate ??? the scripture year" upon it ??? they eat ??? except Rav for he said: like Rabbi he gave for he said: ??? Paschal offerings is not essential Which Rabbi Natan Shall I say this one Rabbi Natan as it is taught: Rabbi Natan says ??? for all of Israel ??? on Passover one Scripture states: (Ex. 12) ??? that specific all ??? Israel twilight And so all ??? Is it not the case that yes. ??? except one except This teaches for all of Israel ??? on Passover one perhaps, It is different there in that case For if it was ??? Behold! Look, ??? and if ??? Behold! Look, ??? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching R' he gave as it is taught: ??? upon it ??? One and they returned ??? upon it ??? in which they have an olive's volume they eat and are exempt ??? Passover two ??? that do not to them an olive's volume yes. they eat and they are obligated to do Passover two Rabbi Natan says both these and these: are exempt ??? Passover two immediately ??? the blood ??? perhaps, It is different there in that case For if it was ??? Behold! Look, them If so, Let the Tanna teach: Because ??? What then does it mean when it says immediately ??? the blood Learn from this with blood hangs the validity but: food is not essential What then does it mean when it says ??? of Rav ??? to it ??? initially and R' he gave ??? and even in the case where it has already been done, also, it is not valid. Rav ??? why is it that ??? yes. ??? the blood Let the Tanna teach: is invalid, except Learn from this yes. ??? initially but: once it has been done it is of acceptable worth. to R' he gave a man on account of he ate why do I have ??? a person ??? as regard to eating, Which Tanna taught: about this teaching For the Rabbis taught ??? that did not have ??? the Paschal offering himself is valid a person he would exit in it the hands of ??? like who Let him say Rabbi Natan She and not rabbis even you say rabbis yes. ??? they eat Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified Which Tanna taught: about this teaching For the Rabbis taught Behold! that he was an ill person in the hour of ??? in the hour of ??? in the hour of ??? an ill person in the hour of ??? yes. ??? upon it until that it should be ??? until ??? like who Let him say It is the rabbis' position and not Rabbi Natan even you say Rabbi Natan a person ??? as regard to eating, in the case of Which Tanna taught: about this teaching For the Rabbis taught ??? and after this ??? the blood ??? and do not shall eat meat ??? like who he said Rabbi Eliezer and variant texts say Elazar ??? and Rabbi Natan She And Rabbi Yochanan said: even you say It is the rabbis' position Here in this case, with what are we dealing? (in the case of a community offering) that even ??? also my slave If it was (in the case of a community offering) why is it that yes. ??? is eaten ??? lest ??? After the act of sprinkling, and they shall say ??? No. ??? now also ??? and not ??? For ??? blood ??? are they, now ??? are they,