PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עט,א גמרא

And if you wish, I would say Rav for he said: ??? Joshua as it is taught: Rabbi Yehoshua says: all ??? between that became tamei, meat and milk stood i.e., as long as he lived between that became tamei, milk meat stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? the blood a Nazir makes Passover ??? milk meat stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? the blood ??? meat and milk stood i.e., as long as he lived yes. ??? the blood and if In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? No. ??? and if In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- No. ??? is not thus ??? Our mishna with whom does it agree? Rabbi Yehoshua She as it is taught: Rabbi Yehoshua says: all ??? from them an olive's volume meat or an olive's volume milk ??? the blood ??? olive tree meat ??? olive tree milk yes. ??? the blood the case is that of an elevation-offering, even ??? olive tree meat ??? olive tree milk ??? the blood because of ??? and at Minchah despite the fact ??? standing No. ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Pappa said: the meal-offering associated with a libation You might have thought that I would say that immediately that he came We come to compare ??? zevach-offering ??? he is equivalent. Come and learn from this. milk What is our source for this claim R' Yochanan said: It is because of this: R' Yishmael ??? of it In the name of Rabbi Yehoshua the son of Chananya: For scripture said: (Lev. 17) ??? to Hashem milk despite the fact that do not meat ??? milk ??? and two ??? What is our source for this claim in a case say ??? When the baraita teaches and at Minchah despite the fact ??? standing No. ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) he that is not but: ??? and two ??? it is of acceptable worth. What is our source for this claim Rabbi Yochanan that are his he said Scripture states: ??? all that you ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? milk and It is necessary to teach this ??? For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: milk then I might incorrectly say: milk yes. ??? and two ??? it is not written: the Merciful One ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? then I might incorrectly say: all ??? And even if the afternoon service (Minchah) Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: milk

דף עט,א משנה

??? or the majority of his body or that were the priests. ??? ??? doing ??? doing the second

דף עט,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught Behold! that were Israel ??? and priests and implements of ??? or that were Israel ??? and priests and implements of ??? and even Israel and priests ??? and implements of ??? that do not sacrifice ??? Rav Chisdah said They did not teach such a ruling except that became tamei, ??? did he die ??? he said (Num. 19) ??? Behold! he ??? become tamei to a person originally For ??? but: ??? he ??? for him to a person No. ??? for him ??? does he act? ??? No. does he act? that is good for him shall eat ??? meat ??? and do not shall eat meat ??? that he was ??? Perhaps, his reasoning is Rav Chisda ??? She (in the case of a community offering) and thus he said R' Isaac ??? She (in the case of a community offering) And Rabba said even ??? also my slave What is the reason? As it is written (Lev. 7) ??? who ??? in all tamei does not eat in fire ??? all tahor shall eat meat all in a case that is not we recite of him. ??? who ??? in all tamei does not eat No. we recite of him. ??? all tahor shall eat meat all in a case ??? of him. ??? who ??? in all tamei does not eat we recite of him. ??? all tahor shall eat meat it was said: Behold! that were Israel ??? Rav said: half and half ??? and Rav Kahana he said half and half he does not ??? Rav said: half and half ??? doing for themselves ??? doing for themselves ??? he said half and half he does not ??? doing ??? doing the second that it is possible that they said Rav said ??? half and half he does not ??? doing ???

דף עט,ב גמרא

??? Watch out for leading vav And we do not make not ??? and not the second ??? No. my slave that is not are they, ??? with two No. my slave that is not are they, ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? or the majority of his body or that were the priests. ??? may he do it? ??? the majority of his body he ??? but: a fraction and a fraction No. my slave ??? It is a difficulty for Rav's position. Rav would say to you ??? my slave all of them ??? a fraction and a fraction ??? doing for themselves ??? doing for themselves So, here, ??? it is taught at the end ??? doing ??? doing the second ??? he ??? with two but: a fraction and a fraction No. and my slave ??? doing for themselves ??? doing for themselves So rather, It is a difficulty for Rav's position. ??? Rav would say to you ??? doing ??? doing the second this one a fraction and a fraction ??? doing ??? but: ??? are not doing not ??? and not the second ??? to the teaching that was last of Rav ??? except ??? for he said: Rav Kahana ??? doing ??? doing the second What is there to say? Rav would say to you ??? it is the law that even a fraction and a fraction also ??? doing ??? doing the second and This case where he teaches ??? But the beginning of the teaching, the majority of his body a Tanna taught: also at the end of the teaching, ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav they were Israel ??? doing for themselves ??? doing for themselves It was taught: ??? that came first of Rav ??? Behold! that were Israel ??? doing ??? doing the second and it was taught: ??? that was last of Rav ??? Behold! that were Israel ??? doing ??? are not doing not ??? and not the second for Rav, and to the teaching that was last of Rav ??? this one ??? doing ??? the second in what way does they interpret to it For example, that were Israel ??? women ??? but his thought is women ??? is a voluntary act ??? women impart tumah are they, them ??? two for Rav, and to the teaching that came first of Rav ??? this one that teaches ??? doing ??? Watch out for leading vav And we do not make not ??? and not the second in what way does they interpret to it Rav ??? to it For example, that were Israel ??? women ??? on ??? but his thought is women ??? guilt-obligation and with two is a voluntary act ??? No. my slave that there is for him ??? No. my slave ??? and with two No. my slave ??? women ??? are they, them a fraction and a fraction and a fraction No. my slave with two and for Rav, ??? for he said: a fraction also my slave with two thus ??? to it For example, that were Israel ??? women ??? but his thought is women ??? guilt-obligation and with two is a voluntary act ??? No. my slave where they did them a fraction and a fraction and a fraction ??? No. my slave with two also No. my slave ??? women ??? from ??? are they, them ??? No. my slave with two and for Rav, ??? this one that teaches Behold! that were Israel ??? doing for themselves ??? doing for themselves in what way does ??? to it Rav would say to you ??? She that it is possible ??? half and half ??? and there are ??? half and half he does not ??? Back to the main body of the text: Behold! that were Israel ??? doing for themselves ??? doing for themselves they were ??? on ??? Even if one ??? on account of that do not sacrifice ??? son of ??? says yes. Watch out for leading vav or the individual ??? ??? as it is said