PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פ,א גמרא

(in Deut. 16) No. ??? the Paschal offering on the first ??? Rabbi Shimon says: even ??? one tamei but the remainder of all ??? doing for themselves ??? doing for themselves What is the reason? of Rabbi Shimon his reasoning is ??? one ??? Rabbi Yehudah says even ??? one tamei but the remainder of all ??? that do not sacrifice ??? Rabbi Yehudah reasoned ??? one ??? are they, them a fraction and a fraction And there is no meaning to the word sacrifice ??? and my slave all of them ??? it was said: they were Israel ??? Rav said impart tumah one from them ??? But why? ??? Behold! ??? and Behold! ??? For thus said Rav ??? doing for themselves ??? doing for themselves They said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, that were ??? on ??? one If so, are they, them ??? all of them ??? derive it ??? son of ??? for he said: yes. Watch out for leading vav or the individual ??? ??? If so, he returns ??? Behold! ??? and Behold! ??? except This is what he means: If it was that it is possible a Tanna taught: ??? to it ??? that came first for he said: a fraction and a fraction No. my slave all of them ??? derive it like Rabbi Yehudah for he said: yes. sacrifice ??? impart tumah one from them ??? he said ??? one from them on the way ??? his reasoning is ??? on tamei ??? you ??? now also ??? you ??? that He performs with two ??? also ??? that He performs ??? that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? are his his reasoning is ??? all of them restitution ??? Look, in all of them and all in a case that is not Look, ??? No. Look, in all of them He said to them Rav ??? and they said to him: ??? one ??? it was said: they were ??? the dead Rav said those particular ??? the dead are not doing No. ??? and not with two ??? No. my slave where they did ??? No. my slave ??? with two also No. my slave all in a case ??? does he act? an individual with two all in a case that is not my slave ??? No. does he act? an individual with two He said to them Shmuel ??? And they said to him ??? (Num. 9) ??? the Children of Israel the Paschal offering ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him He said to them ??? And they said to him For are they, all of them ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him except immediately where it is not possible No. ??? Here in this case, also, No. ??? it was said: they were ??? the dead ??? Rav Huna he said yes. restitution ??? that comes ??? Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? he said there are restitution ??? that comes ??? Let him say In this case, what they disagree about ??? for he said: yes. restitution ??? that comes ??? his reasoning is ??? She (in the case of a community offering) ??? there are restitution ??? that comes ??? his reasoning is ??? (in the case of a community offering) They said: No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? (in the case of a community offering) In this case, ??? one master reasons that

דף פ,ב גמרא

??? No. ??? and one master reasons that even ??? also ??? it was said: they were ??? the dead he said Rabbi with whom does it agree? son of ??? those particular ??? the dead are not doing not ??? and not the second ??? No. my slave ??? on ??? that is not my slave ??? it was. for him ??? the dead ??? No. my slave ??? with two No. my slave ??? with ??? the dead that is not my slave ??? are they, them ??? No. ??? two

דף פ,ב משנה

the Paschal offering ??? and after this ??? that he was tamei ??? yes. ??? because of where they said ??? makes Passover ??? on ??? the blood And there is no meaning to the word ??? on ???

דף פ,ב גמרא

The reason is ??? and after this ??? but: ??? and after this ??? No. ??? They challenged this from a baraita: on Just as ??? on the blood and on ??? and on ??? that became tamei, between in error between with intent between ??? between ??? between privately between (in the case of a community offering) Ravina said ??? between in error between with intent ??? in error ??? with intent No. ??? Rabbi ??? he said ??? between in error between with intent ??? in error ??? with intent No. ??? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching where he teaches between in error between with intent This is what he means: ??? in error ??? between in error between with intent ??? Hey, isn't it the case that where he teaches blood ??? and after this ??? The reason is ??? and after this ??? but: ??? and after this ??? No. it is the law that even ??? and after this ??? and This case where he teaches ??? and after this ??? It is because of this: who seeks ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? yes. ??? that even ??? and after this ??? No. The tanna teaches: But the beginning of the teaching, also ??? and after this ??? he is required pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama a priest ??? to him ??? or No. who say For We have a tradition that ??? No. We have a tradition that or perhaps, ??? We have a tradition that there is no difference ??? and They did not teach this לא שנו ??? Rabba said: Come and hear: for it teaches: Rabbi Chiyya Watch out for leading vav And they did not say ??? except for a dead person only. did he die ??? Is this not ??? and with what are we dealing? If you were to say ??? If it was ??? who from those of him. (Num. 6) For ??? did he die upon it the Merciful One in the Torah says except ??? Passover This is satistfactory for one for he said: yes. ??? on ??? except for one for he said: ??? on ??? now ??? to him ??? is it not all the more so? except Is this not ??? And learn from this ??? to him ??? Rav Yosef said No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and on Passover ??? No. ??? For it was taught: Rabbi Yosei says: ??? day opposite day ??? upon it