PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פג,א גמרא

Rabbah ??? Even Rabbi Yehudah the Gallilean as it is taught: ??? says all ??? all of it he does not ??? except ??? ??? and to give No. shall you do on ??? They said to him: A sin-offering ??? of its blood before and inwards from where do we learn He said to them: (Lev. 10) there are. No. ??? of its blood to that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? from this general principle it would follow For if it was he departs ??? of its blood ??? and Rabbi Yochanan reasoned blood meat it is a single observance ??? a saying ??? She

דף פג,א משנה

??? ten ??? to be on Shabbat ??? on account of those that are not ??? not the Sabbath and not ???

דף פג,א גמרא

Rav said ??? son of Avuah R' Yitzchak said ??? holy offerings ??? notar impart tumah ??? Because was it made? ??? for a matter of ??? Let him say ??? Behold! ??? How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say ??? in them? ??? For what reason ??? except This is obvious! for there is in them? ??? If you say, This is satisfactory ??? notar the validity She ??? he is required burning except If you say, ??? notar Is this not the validity She For what reason them burning ??? ??? except Is this not Learn from this ??? notar the validity She They said: No. In reality lit: In the world I would say to you ??? notar Is this not the validity but his thought is in it ??? And even if ??? Even if ??? Hey, isn't it the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: but: ??? he does not ??? ??? There is no difficulty. here, ??? to him ??? here, that did not have it was to him ??? and Which Tanna taught: ??? for him between ??? to him ??? it was to him ??? Rabbi Ya'akov She as it is taught: (Ex. 12) ??? No. ??? in it in it ??? and not ??? Rabbi Ya'akov says it was to him ??? there are in it It is because of this: ??? No. it was to him ??? yes. in it It is because of this: ??? Rabbi Shimon says: One of these and one of these yes. in it It is because of this: ??? They challenged him from this teaching: all ??? yes. ??? burning except ??? the Paschal offering because of ??? Behold! ??? How so? Shall I say ??? in them? ??? For what reason them burning except This is obvious! for there is in them? ??? and if You might have thought ??? notar the validity She ??? holy offerings why is it that yes. ??? burning Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? holy offerings ??? of them It is because of this: ??? in the presence of ??? notar ??? and not are they, ??? notar and not They asked burning ??? the Paschal offering ??? of them It is because of this: ??? notar he ??? are they, them ??? notar They asked burning Rav ??? he said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example,

דף פג,ב גמרא

??? and from them ??? holy offerings ??? of them It is because of this: ??? it was. ??? them ??? them and it does not require burning ??? the Paschal offering ??? of them It is because of this: ??? perhaps, Behold! ??? No. ??? he is required burning R' Yehudah said: Rav said all ??? meat except ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? Behold! ??? How so? Shall I say ??? meat ??? and if ??? we were notar except This is obvious! ??? This is satisfactory meat ??? he is required burning except If you say, Is this not meat ??? For what reason them burning R' Chisda said No. ??? except ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah as it is taught: R' Yehuda says: is not customary except in one ??? of ??? So rather, ??? from doubt for him according to R' Yehudah For if it was ??? This is obvious to him. this particular ??? what is the purpose according to him burning Thus said Rabbi ??? son of ??? For example, ??? and in the end ??? Rav Ashi said: No. ??? except ??? as it is taught: ??? is permitted. and a Jew lit, Israel ??? are these and We were accustomed in it prohibits Ravina he said ??? Shmuel said for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said two ??? there are. ??? is forbidden but we are guilty on its account ??? is forbidden And there is no meaning to the word they are obligated ??? But why? ??? One who acts ??? No. shall you do he said ??? and thus It was taught by of the academy of Hezekiyah said: he read (Ex. 12) No. ??? from him until ??? from him until ??? in fire ??? that do not Scripture states: until mornings Just as Scripture states: until mornings to give to him mornings two ??? Abaye said Scripture states: (Num. 28) ??? Sabbath ??? and not ??? weekday on Shabbat and not ??? weekday on Yom Tov Rava said: Scripture states: (Ex. 12) he ??? may he do it? to you he and not its preparations ???