PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פד,א גמרא

and not ??? that did not have in its time ??? From a "kal vachomer", Rav Ashi said: (Lev. 23) ??? One who acts he And there is no meaning to the word One who acts ??? No. shall you do One who acts

דף פד,א משנה

all ??? an adult male shall eat ???

דף פד,א גמרא

Rabbah pointed out a contradiction. We have learnt in a Mishna: all ??? an adult male shall eat ??? but when it is not is eaten No. I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Behold! No. ??? an adult male except ??? She And this is what the tanna means to teach: all ??? an adult male shall eat ??? but when it is not is eaten No. and there are those who say יש אומרים Even ??? Rava said: Just as there are. The tanna teaches: And this is what the tanna means to teach: all ??? an adult male ??? shall eat ??? for just as there are. ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Raba all ??? an adult male ??? shall eat ??? for just as there are. ??? ??? it was said: ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? about them on Passover ??? he said yes. ??? about them on Passover R' Yochanan said: ??? about them according to now do we go? ??? he said yes. ??? about them according to in the rear of do we go? ??? to R' Yochanan all ??? an adult male shall eat ??? for just as there are. ??? Behold! yes. but: ??? No. He said to him a Tanna taught: Behold! ??? Behold! What is the reason מאי טעמא for it is the case that ??? an adult male ??? also ??? an adult male ??? He said to him R' ??? to Rabbi Avin: For ??? in front For R' ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? pointed out a contradition to him Rabbi Yochanan ??? about them on Passover Perhaps, according to now do we go? and He brought this very question ??? Yochanan ??? of ??? What then? ??? and he said to him yes. become tamei Perhaps, according to in the rear of do we go? He said to him ??? to you this one No. ??? this one he returns of him. Rabbi Yochanan to join with the body of he expounds. ??? And he said to him: to ??? an individual I he learns Mishna it

דף פד,א משנה

??? ??? on Passover ??? Behold! this ??? forty but: ??? he does not ??? ???

דף פד,א גמרא

This is satisfactory ??? as it is taught: (Ex. 12) No. ??? from him until mornings ??? from him until mornings etc. came the scripture to give One who acts after No. shall you do to say that do not ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Rabbi Ya'akov says No. from the Name is this except It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected Is this not in which is not It once happened And there is no meaning to the word ??? upon it except ??? From where do we derive this? For scripture said: (Ex. 12) ??? No. ??? in it in it ??? and not ??? The Rabbis taught ??? No. ??? in it in it ??? and not ??? R' says (Ex. 12) in one house shall eat ??? No. ??? in it all ??? as regard to eating, there are in it It is because of this: ??? and those that do not ??? as regard to eating, yes. in it It is because of this: ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Passover that comes ??? There is this difference between them: ??? is valid

דף פד,ב גמרא

This is invalid, ??? as regard to eating, This also ??? as regard to eating, he Rav Yosef said: For This ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world yes. in it It is because of this: ??? For R' ??? will come and that one this one is invalid, he except it was to him ??? There is this difference between them: ??? is valid this one is valid he ??? as regard to eating, this one now Is this not ??? as regard to eating, he Abaye said ??? all For This ??? yes. in it It is because of this: ??? What is the reason? now Regardless, this one is invalid, he except ??? while it is still day There is this difference between them: ??? is valid this one is valid he ??? as regard to eating, now Is this not son of food he They challenged him from this teaching: Rabbi says ??? on ??? that are of the head. And there is no meaning to the word ??? on ??? on ??? that are of the head. What is the reason מאי טעמא Because It is possible ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? while it is still day it is of acceptable worth. ??? also ??? while it is still day ??? that are his ??? upon it He could say to you Abaye ??? also ??? upon it ??? that are his ??? upon it for it is the case that It was taught: but: ??? yes. in it It is because of this: ??? Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you to say Abaye said It is because of this: ??? Rava said: It is because of this: ??? holy offerings that he came ??? for him ??? perhaps, ??? that are his while it is still day also ??? while it is still day because ??? Rav Papa said, all For This ??? there are in it It is because of this: ??? What is the reason? ??? as regard to eating, except ??? that went out partially what they disagree about ??? is valid this one is valid he ??? as regard to eating, This Is this not son of food he As it is taught: R' Yishmael his son of R' Yochanan son of ??? says ??? that went out partially ??? yes. in it It is because of this: ??? Rav Sheishet the son of of Rav This he said all ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world yes. in it It is because of this: ??? That this ??? this one is invalid, he except ??? There is this difference between them: ??? is valid this one is valid he ??? as regard to eating, now he does not ??? as regard to eating, Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he said all For This ??? there are in it It is because of this: ??? What is the reason? for it is the case that Look, as regard to eating, ??? for him and he has already eaten except ??? There is this difference between them: ??? is valid this one is valid he ??? as regard to eating, This he does not ??? as regard to eating, ??? Rav Ashi said: all For This ??? certainly yes. in it It is because of this: ??? for it is the case that certainly he does not ??? as regard to eating, A general principle: except ??? that do not upon it an olive's volume meat There is this difference between them: ??? is valid this one is valid he ??? as regard to eating, in the case of the measure food there is not in this case. Ravina he said all For This ??? is not there? It is because of this: ??? the measure food except ??? that do not upon it an olive's volume meat in a place this and there are upon it an olive's volume meat in a place after There is this difference between them: for one for he said: is valid this one is valid he for one for he said: ??? as regard to eating, in the case of the measure food in a place ??? And that is absent here It was taught: ??? as it is taught: R' says (Ex. 12) in one house shall eat (Ex. 12) ??? No. ??? in it on ??? he he is liable and he is not liable when done on one that is invalid? it was to him ??? in the hour of food yes. in it It is because of this: ??? there are in it the measure food there are in it It is because of this: ??? yes. in it the measure food yes. in it It is because of this: ??? yes. in it It is because of this: ??? in the hour of food there are in it It is because of this: ??? that did not have in the hour of food yes. in it It is because of this: ??? it was said: ??? that do not upon it an olive's volume meat in a place this and there are upon it an olive's volume meat in a place after Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: there are in it It is because of this: ??? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? he said yes. in it It is because of this: ??? Rabbi Yochanan to Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish (Resh Lakish) ??? No. ??? in it one ??? in which there is upon it an olive's volume meat and one ??? that do not upon it an olive's volume meat What then does it mean when it says yes. upon it an olive's volume meat Shall I say ??? upon it an olive's volume meat A general principle: why is it that there are in it It is because of this: ??? except Is this not thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: one ??? in which there is upon it an olive's volume meat in a place this and one that do not upon it an olive's volume meat in a place this and there are upon it an olive's volume meat in a place after ??? to Rabbi Shimon son of ??? He said to him