PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פה,א גמרא

No. thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: one ??? in which there is upon it an olive's volume meat ??? and one ??? that do not upon it an olive's volume meat ??? and there are upon it an olive's volume meat ??? in a place ??? For it was taught: (Ex. 12) ??? No. ??? in it one ??? in which there is in it ??? and one ??? in which is not ??? for just as I is fulfilled lit. is stood up (Ex. 12) and he ate the flesh by night ??? in the case of the flesh. for upon regarding ??? Or perhaps, except in the case of the flesh. ??? for just as I is fulfilled lit. is stood up ??? No. ??? in it ??? in which is not ??? but: ??? in which there is in it ??? and eats and do not ??? for behold! ??? One who acts ??? For as it says: (Num. 9) ??? No. ??? in it on Passover two that do not Scripture states: for behold! Already it is said (Num. 9) ??? the Paschal offering ??? that specific you shall says one ??? in which there is in it ??? and one ??? in which is not ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? that went out partially ??? until a place ??? until ??? to section ??? And if you say ??? that do not upon it an olive's volume meat in a place this and there are in a place after yes. in it It is because of this: ??? why do I have ??? until ??? to section ??? of him. ??? Abaye said It is because of this: ??? Ravina he said ??? It was taught there: Pigul ??? impart tumah ??? Rav Huna and Rav Chisda One says because of ??? the priesthood and one says because of ??? the priesthood Master, he would say over ??? Master, he would say over ??? one ??? It is because of this: ??? the priesthood and one ??? It is because of this: ??? the priesthood Master, he would say over an olive's volume Master, he would say over an egg's volume one ??? an olive's volume like the law regarding its being forbidden and one ??? an egg's volume ??? They posed this difficulty: he would exit ??? rabbis ??? or No. who say notar ??? of him. but: he would exit ??? No. ??? for him ??? No. ??? of him. rabbis ??? or perhaps, there is no difference Come and hear: ??? that went out partially ??? until ??? until ??? to section ??? of him. rabbis ??? For ??? for him What then does it mean when it says you shall this one ??? for him ??? She ??? No. ??? for he said: ??? they eat Is this not ??? he like who ??? he is equivalent. What is there to say? this one ??? become tamei except for one ??? an olive's volume ??? of him. an olive's volume and one ??? an egg's volume ??? of him. an egg's volume Come and hear: the taking out meat Passover ??? despite the fact that he was without shall you do tahor Is this not tahor is forbidden ??? except ??? he is equivalent. ??? And even if Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: tahor Perhaps, No. ??? rabbis ??? No. tahor and it is permitted ??? Is this not ??? except ??? he is equivalent. and not ??? And then it happened that It was taught by at the end of the teaching, ??? Behold! this ??? This is satisfactory for one for he said: an egg's volume that there is in it: an olive's volume is not there? an egg's volume except for one for he said: an olive's volume What is there to say? except ??? on Passover No. ??? to us that is not ??? rabbis ??? What is the reason? Members of a fellowship ??? there are. ??? of him. except For ??? to us ??? What then does it mean when it says The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. and sends forth meat Passover

דף פה,ב גמרא

??? from where do we learn as it is taught: (Ex. 12) No. ??? from the house from ??? yes. for me except from house to house ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: ??? except ??? Rav Ami said the taking out meat Passover ??? he is not liable until ??? it is written of him. like Shabbat Just as Sabbath until ??? Even So, here, until ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rabbi Abba son of ??? they were ??? those particular ??? that are the first they have fulfilled the mitzvah except ??? they have not fulfilled the mitzvah that are the first impart tumah garments ??? yes. impart tumah garments Hey, isn't it the case that No. ??? he ??? to it This is only in the case ??? to it ???

דף פה,ב משנה

??? that went out partially ??? until ??? until ??? to section ??? in which is not It is because of this: ??? from ??? and inwards ??? from ??? and outwards ??? the walls ???

דף פה,ב גמרא

Rav Yehudah said Rav said and thus to the Prayer i.e., Amidah and disagrees ??? for thus said Rabbi Joshua son of Levi even a partition of ??? It is not ??? between Israel to their Father Who is in Heaven this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? from ??? and inwards ??? this one ??? himself ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, from ??? and outwards ??? this one ??? himself ??? There is no difficulty. here, ??? The Courtyard --- here, ??? Jerusalem for he said: Rabbi Shmuel son of Rav Isaac On account of what No. ??? Jerusalem because of ??? because of the sun ??? because of the rains and he said Rabbi Shmuel son of Rav Isaac On account of what No. ??? the gate ??? because of ??? they stand in that place ??? the walls ??? Rav said ??? No. ??? Really? For didn't Rav say It is because of this: Rabbi Chiyya ???