PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13
Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.
Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits
Disclaimers
This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.
Copyright
This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."
Credits
I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף פו,א גמרא
Is this not ??? They said: ??? No. ??? on earth. They said: ??? Really? For it was taught in a mishna: yes. ??? after the Paschal offering ??? And Rav says that did not have ??? There is no difficulty. here, in the hour of food here, that did not have in the hour of food Come and hear: Abba Shaul says: ??? the house of the Holy of Holies is stricter from the house of the Holy of Holies ??? the Holy of Holies the high priest enter to him One time in the year ??? the house of the Holy of Holies yes. enters to it except One time ??? And there are those who say it was occasions ??? And there are those who say it was One time with the Jubilee ??? Just as She it requires Rav Yosef said ??? that I ??? As it is written (I Chron. 28) He shall give" David ??? his son in the shape of ??? and ??? and ??? the house of ??? and then it is written (I Chron. 28) The entirety in writing immediately Hashem by the ??? Come and hear: ??? weekday ??? Rav Chisda ??? they agree to the earth The Courtyard --- If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? weekday And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? they agree to the earth The Courtyard --- ??? to it ??? And R' Yochanan said ??? No. ??? and thus he comes to say Rabbi Yochanan ??? to the Temple Mount For this teaching ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? weekday For this teaching ??? Come and hear: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: ??? yes. they eat in that place The holiest of holy offerings And there is no meaning to the word ??? in that place simple offerings So rather, it is a problem ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use Rav said Chama son of ??? two cubits For it was taught in a baraita two cubits he was ??? One on the principal amount north-east and one on the principal amount ??? south -- this refers to for upon the principal amount north-east it was ??? on of Moses ??? -- this refers to for upon the principal amount ??? south it was ??? upon it ??? on of Moses ??? and for what reason they were One that is large and one a small one ??? The workers ??? and we make him repeat ??? so that that did not have ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of the laws of misappropriation of sacred things and two why do I have One ??? and one ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? the walls ??? This is satisfactory ??? It concerns itself ??? to the earth The Courtyard --- except ??? the walls in what way does It concerns itself It concerns itself ??? As it is written (Lam. 2) ??? and he said Rabbi ??? (and there are those who say Rabbi ??? and bar ???
דף פו,א משנה
two fellowships that were they eat in one house these ??? ??? and they eat and these ??? ??? and they eat ??? in the midst of ??? to mix ??? his mouth and he turns his face until ??? next to ??? and eats ??? ???
דף פו,א גמרא
??? with whom does it agree? it is Rabbi Yehudah as it is taught: (Ex. 12) on ??? who ??? that specific at them." This teaches ??? is eaten ??? fellowships It is possible ??? One who eats he eats ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Ex. 12) in one house shall eat from here the sun said who ate an olive's volume beside the oven If it was ??? he ??? from him and if ??? Members of a fellowship to do with it that is good have come they sit ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Rabbi Shimon says: on ??? who ??? that specific at them." This teaches ??? he eats ???
דף פו,ב גמרא
It is possible ??? is eaten ??? fellowships Scripture states: in one house shall eat about what do they disagree? Rabbi Yehudah reasoned there are if ??? and R' Shimon reasoned there are if For scripture, they were they sit ??? a partition among them according to the words of One who says Passover is eaten ??? fellowships they eat according to the words of One who says yes. the Paschal offering is eaten ??? fellowships yes. they eat they were they sit ??? a partition ??? according to the words of One who says One who eats he eats with two ??? they eat according to the words of One who says yes. One who eats he eats with two ??? yes. they eat ??? Rav Kahana ??? for him ??? Rav Ashi said to him for Rav, ??? to you ??? a partition ??? a partition who you shall ??? fellowships he is equivalent. or No. ??? ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said because of that it ??? Rav Huna the son of of Rav he gave ??? my heart Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak And they said to him Just as Your Name He said to them Rav Huna And they said ??? Master, ??? for him a cup ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two times and not ??? his face And they said to him What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? to you Rav Huna He said to them the master of the Name I What is the reason מאי טעמא For And they said to you ??? He said to them all Just as ??? to you the master of the house One who acts ??? What is the reason? For ??? to you a cup ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? He said to them ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two times He said to them as it is taught: one who drinks ??? "At the same time," Behold! this ??? two a way earth three ??? What is the reason? No. ??? He said to them a bride ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: Rabbi Yishmael the son of Rabbi Yosi ??? my heart Rabbi Shimon the son of Rabbi Yosi son of ??? for him a cup ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? they said to him Do you not derive from this, Master, one who drinks ??? "At the same time," Behold! this ??? He said to them they do not say ??? a child ??? Rav Huna said Members of a fellowship enters in a case where there are three ??? even on the first Rabbah said This is only in the case ??? to inform lit: to witness ??? to ascend This is only in the case ??? in them? ??? Ravina said ??? the reward for ??? and it is necessary ??? And the halacha is not is according to either opinion ???
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.