PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צא,א משנה

??? ??? and thus who ??? from the house of imprisonment. and an ill person and the elder that are it is possible for them to eat an olive's volume ??? about them on all of them yes. ??? about them before ??? lest ??? the Paschal offering to suffer lit, to the hands of is invalid, For this reason if ??? of them is invalid, are exempt ??? Passover two except for ??? in a pile that he was tamei from its beginning

דף צא,א גמרא

Rabbah said son of ??? that R' Yochanan said They did not teach such a ruling except the house of ??? but: the house of ??? of Israel ??? alone by itself immediately ??? for him As it is written (Zeph. 3) ??? Israel No. ??? an elevation-offering and not ??? Rav Chisdah said That which you said, the house of ??? They did not say that except in a case except ??? the house of ??? but: within ??? the house of ??? upon it alone by itself What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? for him ??? For this reason if ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said R' Yochanan said: They did not teach such a ruling except a pile of stones a circle-cake but: a pile of stones ??? is exempt ??? Passover two I would say tahor he was in the hour of ??? Another teaching is like this: Rabbi Shimon his son of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah says ??? in a pile ??? is exempt ??? he is liable How so? a pile of stones a circle-cake ??? beneath it he is liable a pile of stones ??? beneath it is exempt I would say tahor he was in the hour of ???

דף צא,א משנה

yes. ??? the Paschal offering on Watch out for leading vav or the individual these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. and Rabbi Yosei, permits and even ??? of hundred those that are not it is possible for them to eat an olive's volume yes. ??? about them And we do not make ??? women and slaves and children

דף צא,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught from where do we learn that do not ??? the Paschal offering on Watch out for leading vav or the individual Therefore, scripture states: (in Deut. 16) No. ??? the Paschal offering on the first these are the words of R' Yehudah and Rabbi Yosei says: an individual It is possible ??? upon it ten And there is no meaning to the word it is possible for them ??? yes. ??? about them and Rabbi Yosei, This on the first What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon says: ??? ??? an individual in the hour of prohibits ??? that he was without shall you do Scripture states: No. ??? the Paschal offering on the first ??? It is possible Even in the hour of permission ??? thus Scripture states: on the first ??? Watch out for leading vav And they did not say except at the hour for all of Israel enters ??? one and Rabbi Yehudah This ??? for him both ??? to R' ??? From where can you derive ??? for he says Rabbi Shimon perhaps, ??? R' Yehudah he who has arrived He could say to you No. You might have thought for it is the case that it is written (Ex. 12) a man on account of he ate Rav pointed out a contradition to him ??? son of ??? to Raba who R' Yehudah said: yes. ??? the Paschal offering on Watch out for leading vav or the individual They challenged this from a baraita: a woman ??? upon it in its own right and with two doing it ??? to others these are the words of R' Yehudah He said to him No. you say in its own right except I would say before ??? He said to him: who ??? women For it was taught in a mishna: Watch out for leading vav And we do not make ??? women and slaves and children Is this not women ??? and slaves ??? and children ??? He said to him: No. women and slaves and children women and slaves It is because of this: prayers children and slaves It is because of this:

דף צא,ב גמרא

??? Back to the main body of the text: a woman ??? upon it in its own right and with two doing it ??? to others these are the words of R' Yehudah R' Yosei says a woman with two ??? upon it in its own right And there is no meaning to the word ??? Rabbi Shimon says: a woman ??? doing it ??? to others with two yes. ??? upon it all the essence about what do they disagree? Rabbi Yehudah reasoned (Ex. 12) ??? souls and even women And if you say ??? even with two also it is written (Num. 9) ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man This certain individual a man yes. a woman No. And if you say If so, even ??? also with two No. ??? the Paschal offering ??? in reality and Rabbi Yosei, What is the reason? As it is written ??? souls and even a woman and then it is written on Passover two (Num. 9) ??? this particular from Israel ??? and even women So rather, ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man This certain individual ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? a child ??? and Rabbi Shimon it is written ??? a man a man yes. a woman No. And if you say If so, even ??? also No. ??? for him ??? And if you would say even with two also ??? the Merciful One with two As it is written ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man a man yes. a woman No. From where can you derive ??? for him If it was ??? now ??? No. with two ??? except Is this not ??? And what does it mean when it says a man for he says Rabbi Shimon If you were to say (Ex. 12) and they took to them a man ??? the forefathers etc. This certain individual should bring himself ??? Isaac for he said: a man he merits And there is no meaning to the word a child he merits So rather, (Ex. 12) From the man on account of he ate this one ??? derive it like R' Shimon Rabbi Shimon also derive it like R' Yosi This certain individual should bring himself ??? the Paschal offering on Watch out for leading vav or the individual He could say to you If so, ??? the Merciful One on account of he ate What then does it mean when it says a man ??? both like who ??? this one For Rabbi Eliezer said: a woman ??? guilt-obligation and with two is a voluntary act ??? the Sabbath If it was is a voluntary act why is it that ??? the Sabbath except I would say with two is a voluntary act ??? guilt-obligation ??? the Sabbath like who like Rabbi Yehudah Thus said Rabbi Ya'akov that R' Yochanan said Watch out for leading vav And we do not make ??? is destiny? ??? lest ??? in it ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? The Rabbis taught Passover ??? guilt-obligation from here and onwards is a voluntary act R' Shimon says ??? guilt-obligation ??? is a voluntary act ??? he arises Shall I say ??? Passover all seven who that it is possible So rather, ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, Rabbi Shimon says: ??? guilt-obligation ??? is a voluntary act he does not have to Rabbi Shimon this one For Rabbi Eliezer said: women ??? So says the Torah. as it is said (in Deut. 16) It may not be eaten upon it chametz seven days It may be eaten upon it the commandments all ??? It may be eaten chametz ??? and Behold! women Because ??? It may be eaten chametz ??? except I would say Passover ??? guilt-obligation from here and onwards is a voluntary act R' Shimon says Passover ??? guilt-obligation ??? is a voluntary act

דף צא,ב משנה

??? and eats ??? but not ??? on Watch out for leading vav !! and they died?