PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צג,א גמרא

Just as tamei ??? in his hand to do and does not makes Even a way ??? also ??? in his hand to do and does not makes Rav ??? He could say to you R' ??? that thus reasoned yes. ??? on tamei ??? and I he reasons for himself. ??? on tamei ??? The Rabbis taught these ??? the second ??? ??? and tamei that he was on the way ??? If so, why is it said tamei why is it said So if he wished, ??? No. ??? for him except If so, why is it said on the way ??? from ??? a woman with two who ??? and this was taught! It is possible No. ??? doing the second except tamei ??? that he was on the way ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: (Num. 9) a man a man There is no difficulty. this one R' Yosi this one Rabbi Yehudah and Rabbi Shimon The Rabbis taught he is liable he is spiritually cut off on ??? he is liable he is spiritually cut off on the second these are the words of Rabbi Rabbi Natan says he is liable he is spiritually cut off on ??? but exempt him on the second ??? son of ??? says Even ??? he is not liable he is spiritually cut off unless it is No. One who acts the second ??? as it is taught: ??? between two Paschal offerings and thus a child ??? between two Paschal offerings he is liable to do Passover two these are the words of Rabbi Rabbi Natan says all ??? for two all that do not ??? yes. ??? for two about what do they disagree? Rabbi reasoned two a foot alone by itself he Rabbi Natan reasoned two restitution ??? he ??? No. ??? for him And Rabbi ??? son of ??? reasoned two ??? he ??? the written Torah one do they expound, (Num. 9) "and the man who he tahor on the way No. he was Rabbi reasoned (Num. 9) ??? to do the Paschal offering ??? that is not a slave ??? So, too, (Num. 9) sacrifice Hashem No. he sacrificed ??? with two And from where do you derive ??? he is spiritually cut off he

דף צג,ב גמרא

his reasoning is ??? we were he makes the blessing the Name and then it is written ??? the Name (Lev. 24) and exalted. ??? This ??? for in that place Just as there he is spiritually cut off Even here, also he is spiritually cut off and R' he gave reasoned (Num. 9) ??? to do the Paschal offering ??? That this For ??? for it is the case that he This is what he means: the Merciful One for it is the case that sacrifice Hashem No. he sacrificed ??? This ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him his reasoning is ??? Is this not we were he makes the blessing the Name ??? This ??? for in that place ??? Just as Here in this case, he is spiritually cut off Even there i.e., in another mishna he is spiritually cut off and R' ??? son of ??? reasoned ??? to do the Paschal offering ??? If it was sacrifice Hashem No. he sacrificed ??? with two and that one ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him ??? Therefore, ??? in this and in this the words of all are he is liable ??? in this and in this the words of all are is exempt ??? with two to Rabbi to R' he gave ??? to Rabbi ??? son of ??? is exempt ??? with two to Rabbi he is liable to R' he gave to R' ??? son of ??? is exempt

דף צג,ב משנה

What is an example of one a way ??? from ??? and outwards ??? for all wind of these are the words of Rabbi Akiva Rabbi Eliezer says ??? and outwards He said to him: Rabbi Yosei For this reason dots on (Num. 9) Hashem to say No. because of ??? certainly except ??? and outwards

דף צג,ב גמרא

Ulla said from ??? to Jerusalem five ten ??? derive it This is like for he said: Rabbah son of son of ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: how much walking a person by day ten ??? from the rising of the dawn and until the rising of the sun ??? the sun and until when the stars come out. ??? to it ??? from daybreak ??? with his reasoning for he said: ??? If it was this he a way ??? all that do not It is possible ??? in the hour of ??? Mar said: from the rising of the dawn until the rising of the sun ??? What is our source for this claim As it is written (Gen. 19) and just as ??? He ascended ??? etc. and then it is written (Gen. 19) the sun he has fulfilled his obligation on the land and Lot came ??? and he said Rabbi ??? To me Look, for me This certain individual place ??? five ??? Back to the main body of the text: Ulla said whichever he a way ??? all that do not It is possible ??? in the hour of ??? and Rav Yehudah he said all that do not It is possible ??? in the hour of food He said to him: Rabbah ??? it is a problem and of Rav Yehudah it is a problem ??? it is a problem that you said all that do not It is possible ??? in the hour of ??? Hey, isn't it the case that tamei ??? It is possible ??? in the hour of ??? on tamei ??? and of Rav Yehudah it is a problem for he said: all that do not It is possible ??? in the hour of food Hey, isn't it the case that tamei ??? in the hour of food and he said yes. ??? on tamei ??? He said to him: No. To me it is a problem and not of Rav Yehudah it is a problem To me There is no difficulty לא קשיא a way ??? and one who is tahor And there is no meaning to the word a way ???