It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צו,א גמרא

What then? ??? meat ??? also ??? or perhaps, What then does it mean when it says ??? What then does it mean when it says that is not ??? No. ??? Rabba said: ??? meat As it is written (Lev. 7) who to Hashem ??? ??? all in a case ??? meat ??? all in a case ??? meat ??? he is required Rabbi Zeira The offal of Passover Egypt" in a case ??? He said to him Abaye and Who is it who says to us that is not ??? And furthermore, this one a Tanna taught: Rav Yosef three ??? they were in that place on ??? and on two ??? And, too, something other than this It was not

דף צו,א משנה

Just as between Passover Egypt" ??? Passover Egypt" ??? required ??? and on ??? and on two ??? and is eaten ??? by night one Passover ??? accustomed all seven

דף צו,א גמרא

What is our source for this claim As it is written (Ex. 12) His word to all ??? Israel saying: ??? to renew ??? and they took this ??? And there is no meaning to the word Passover ??? Except I can object with text from here: (Ex. 12) and it was the case that to you ??? until four ten day to renew ??? Here, too, this required ??? four days before ??? And there is no meaning to the word after required ??? For it was taught: son of ??? says ??? four days before ??? as it is said (Num. 28) ??? for me ??? and elsewhere in the scripture he says and it was the case that to you ??? until four ten Just as there required ??? four days before ??? Even here, required ??? four days before ??? It is different there in that case As it is written ??? Passover ??? also it is written (Ex. 13) ??? ??? all ??? new this ??? except This certain individual ??? Passover two ??? Except I can object with text from here: As it is written (Ex. 12) and he ate the flesh by night ??? So, here, ??? is eaten by night And there is no meaning to the word after is eaten by night Scripture states: ??? ??? except ??? why do I have ??? son of ??? and Rabbi Akiva Except I can object with text from here: As it is written (Ex. 12) and all ??? does not eat in it So, here, ??? he does not he eats but: he eats on Passover ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 13) ??? except in it why do I have in it he does not he eats but: he he eats ??? Except I can object with text from here: (Ex. 12) ??? son of ??? does not eat in it So, here, ??? he does not he eats but: he eats he Passover ??? Scripture states: ??? except in it why do I have in it ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? from terumah and It is necessary to teach this ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? son of ??? For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? It is because of this: ??? but: son of ??? No. ??? I would say it is not necessary to teach this and if we had heard son of ??? It is because of this: ??? his heart to heaven. but: ??? to heaven. I would say it is not necessary to teach this Except I can object with text from here: (Ex. 12) ??? does not eat in it Here, too, ??? he he does not he eats but: he eats he on Passover ??? Scripture states: ??? except in it why do I have in it ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? from terumah Except I can object with text from here: (Ex. 12) ??? that specific Then shall eat in it So, here, ??? he does not he eats but: he eats on Passover ??? Scripture states: ??? except in it Why do I need in it ??? is essential And there is no meaning to the word ??? is essential from terumah Except I can object with text from here: As it is written (Num. 9) ??? No. ??? in it So, here, ??? he does not ??? but: ??? on Passover ??? Scripture states: ??? except in it why do I have in it ??? and not ??? Except I can object with text from here: As it is written (Ex. 12) to ??? from him please, from him If it was you he eats but: you he eats please, on Passover ??? Scripture states: ??? except from him why do I have ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? and is eaten ??? What is our source for this claim For scripture said: (Ex. 12) ??? that specific ??? that specific is eaten ??? And there is no meaning to the word after is eaten ??? Passover ??? accustomed all seven ??? why is it that he arises If it was Let us say, ??? Passover all seven who that it is possible

דף צו,ב גמרא

except ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? Egypt" one night And naught else For it was taught: Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean says from where do we learn ??? Egypt" that do not ??? accustomed except one day Scripture states: (Ex. 13) does not eat chametz and right next lit: and leaning for him the day "You they go out except This is what he means: one night and it is the law ??? all the day Passover ??? accustomed all seven

דף צו,ב משנה

R' Yehoshua said: I hear ??? Passover ??? Passover It is not ??? And there is no meaning to the word for me ??? Rabbi Akiva said: I ??? the Paschal offering ??? before ??? the Paschal offering ??? until ??? "and he sold ??? peace-offerings and thus ??? after ??? the Paschal offering was sacrificed peace-offerings and thus ???

דף צו,ב גמרא

and let us say, Passover was sacrificed Passover he does not was sacrificed Thus can we come and learn from this. That there are ??? the Paschal offering that is not ??? it was said: Rava said: before ??? and after ??? We learned: Rabbi Zeira he said before ??? and after ??? We learned: and to Rebbi Zeira this one The tanna teaches: before ??? the Paschal offering I would say before time ??? the Paschal offering ??? the Paschal offering ??? before ??? after ??? Rabbi Eliezer says before ??? after ??? after ??? the Paschal offering ??? peace-offerings ??? Rabba said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? after ??? in it after ??? but: Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found before ??? in it after ??? "Kedushah" ??? he came and not ??? Abaye (Lev. 3) if ??? Just as Scripture states: if ??? the Paschal offering after the Paschal offering ??? peace-offerings How so? Shall I say ??? after ??? in it after ??? This is obvious! why do I have he read except Is this not ??? before ??? in it after ??? No. In reality lit: In the world ??? after ??? in it after ??? and he read ??? in reality except he read for what he came As it is taught: ??? the Paschal offering ??? For as it says: if ??? Passover ??? and peace-offerings those who are coming back ??? Passover for all the commandments peace-offerings ??? and For as it says: and if ??? on ??? that do not require ??? there is someone who teaches this as referring He interprets it as referring to the earlier text the Paschal offering ??? before ??? the Paschal offering ??? until ??? "and he sold ??? peace-offerings and thus ??? Rabba said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? before ??? in it before ??? but: Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found before ??? in it after ??? peace-offerings What is the reason? For ??? something ??? for him something that is not Look, for him No. ??? Abaye if ??? Just as Therefore, scripture states: ??? the Paschal offering after the Paschal offering ??? peace-offerings

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.