PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צז,א גמרא

It is possible Even before the Paschal offering thus Therefore, scripture states: he he was sacrificed And there is no meaning to the word ??? the Paschal offering ??? How so? Shall I say ??? before ??? in it before ??? This is obvious! why do I have he read except Is this not ??? before ??? in it after ??? of Raba ??? Shmuel said all ??? on Passover was sacrificed peace-offerings and all ??? on Passover also ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: yes. the Paschal offering was sacrificed peace-offerings except ??? after ??? but: before ??? No. Rav Yosef disagreed ??? he Consider this case: A sin-offering ??? for thus said Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish (Resh Lakish) A sin-offering ??? it it is as if She is standing in the house of ??? And even on Passover For This ??? was sacrificed peace-offerings as it is taught: ??? the Paschal offering ??? For as it says: if ??? the Paschal offering ??? and peace-offerings those who are coming back ??? Passover for all the commandments peace-offerings ??? For as it says: if ??? on ??? that do not required ??? He said to him and thus he comes to say Shmuel ??? did not say ??? who It concerns itself Consider this case: ??? in the hour of the parasha (scriptural section) According to the sages, ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? and it was lost misplaced so he set aside another one as its replacement, and the first one is found and behold, the both of them stand designated. One from them ??? and the second they shall be allowed to die of natural causes these are the words of Rabbi But the sages say: yes. A sin-offering ??? except ??? after ??? this one before ??? And even on Passover in a case ??? and it is found after ??? before ??? was sacrificed peace-offerings Shmuel ??? he reasons for himself. for he said: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that all ??? to Rabbi ??? And even on Passover in a case ??? before ??? and it is found before ??? before ??? Is this not ??? he ??? for he said: Raba ??? night Is this not her name a lost item except ??? to Rabbi in what way does It concerns itself

דף צז,ב גמרא

??? for thus said Rabbi ??? two sin-offerings each of them as backups for the other ??? in one from them and the second it shall go to pasture Hey, isn't it the case that Watch out for leading vav !! And even on Passover For This ??? was sacrificed peace-offerings except Shmuel like R' Shimon he reasons for himself. for he said: ??? sin-offerings die Hey, isn't it the case that ??? to Rabbi Shimon he does not have A general principle: Shmuel also one he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: all ??? on Passover was sacrificed peace-offerings and And what can we come and learn from this? To exclude ??? Yochanan for he said: yes. the Paschal offering was sacrificed peace-offerings except ??? after ??? but: before ??? No. Perhaps, ??? fixed Come and learn from this. ??? fixed ??? other than this And even on Passover in a case ??? and it is found after ??? before ??? peace-offerings Shmuel ??? he reasons, for he said: ??? fixed Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Rabbi Yochanan He ascended yes. the Paschal offering was sacrificed peace-offerings except ??? after ??? but: before ??? No. Perhaps, ??? fixed from this general principle it would follow of Shmuel reasoned ??? fixed except Shmuel like Rabbi he reasons for himself. for he said: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that all ??? to R' ??? And even on Passover in a case ??? before ??? and it is found before ??? his reasoning is before ??? Is this not ??? he but his thought is ??? fixed

דף צז,ב משנה

??? female ??? or male, son of two two ??? until ??? "and he sold ???