It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כג,א גמרא

that is not ??? he does not a scholar For it is written No. ??? and not ??? This certain individual ??? it is written: as it is taught: What is an example of one ??? And what is meant by this term ??? He said to him: ??? He said to him: Is this not tomorrow He said to him: he ??? He said to him: Really? ??? like the way that did not have ??? This is ??? And what is meant by this term ??? He said to him ??? He said to him: No. tomorrow He said to him ??? He said to him: ??? Really? ??? that did not have ??? This is ??? No. and this was taught! ??? and are not ??? and are not ??? doing from love ??? in sufferings about them the scripture says (Judges 5) ??? the sun ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? for him ??? For didn't Raba say all ??? on ??? to him on all ??? for him ??? for just as there are. ??? One or two ??? now two ??? One -- why must that case be taught as well? Rav Chisdah said There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? For it was taught: One ??? two We do not bring out Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? but: ??? even two ??? two And there is no meaning to the word ??? to them except One And there is no meaning to the word ??? to him except One For it was taught: We do not bring out No. ??? and not ??? because of ??? and if ??? to him ??? yes. ??? to him and not only this ??? from the one who was appointed as deputy to the high priest ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? to him also One What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav said ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? his head Abayye said: At the beginning, then I might incorrectly say: this one For it was taught in a baraita son of ??? one who was appointed as deputy to the high priest on ??? I thought to say ??? the priests. ??? from them they were ??? of them they were ??? immediately of what I heard about this teaching as it is taught: and not only this, but ??? from the one who was appointed as deputy to the high priest ??? I thought to say What then does it mean when it says ??? It once happened that were ??? they agree and they were running and we go up ??? The Rabbis taught It once happened with two priests that were ??? they agree and they were running and we go up on the ramp Watch out for leading vav !! ??? one from them ??? four cubits of his fellow he took ??? to him in his heart he stood Rabbi ??? on ??? and he said ??? the house of Israel "Hear ye Behold! he says (Deut. 21) For he shall find ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? do we on who ??? wagon ??? on the city or on ??? all the nation ??? came his father of the infant and they found ??? he said Behold! he ??? My son, ??? and not ??? upon them ??? vessels -- more ??? And thus it says (II Kings 21) also blood ??? he poured it ??? until the point where fill ??? Jerusalem "Here is ??? Which It once happened ??? Shall I say ??? now ??? No. established ??? established except ??? And because of the fact they decreed ??? four cubits What then does it mean when it says ??? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, ??? and from the beginning ??? in reality he immediately ??? even ipso facto they came to suffer lit, to the hands of danger established rabbis ??? he stood Rabbi ??? on ??? and he said ??? the house of Israel "Hear ye Behold! he says For he shall find ??? We on who ??? on the city or on ??? and Jerusalem the daughter of ??? wagon ??? She For it was taught: ten items ??? in Jerusalem -- this refers to One from them

דף כג,ב גמרא

It is not ??? wagon ??? And furthermore, (Deut. 21) No. ??? who ??? it is written Hey, isn't it the case that ??? who ??? except so that ??? came his father of the infant and they found ??? he said Behold! he ??? My son, stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? upon them ??? vessels -- more ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? he ??? but: ??? vessels ??? or perhaps, ??? but: ??? vessels She ??? Come and hear: ??? He used the wording to it ??? also blood ??? he poured it ??? Learn from this ??? he ??? vessels ??? The Rabbis taught (Lev. 6) ??? garments others ??? ??? like the way Yom Kippur ??? weekday Therefore, scripture states: ??? ??? garments others There is an analogy between garments ??? Just as there ??? Even here, ??? If so, Just as Therefore, scripture states: others ??? from them Rabbi Eliezer says: others ??? on the priests. ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? Mar said: others ??? from them ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael garments ??? of them ??? for his master No. ??? of them a cup for his master Raysh Lakish said ??? thus in the same way It is a disagreement ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? the words of all are the blessing of the Service She What is the reason? he expounds. ??? He could say to you Watch out for leading vav !! And if it enters your mind to argue that the blessing of the Service She there are to you the blessing of the Service ??? with two vessels and R' Yochanan ??? the Merciful One ??? and it is the law ??? and what is the difference here, Behold! ??? to account for that which was taught from where do we learn that it should not be a thing before ??? as it is said (Lev. 6) ??? on ??? the Merciful One ??? that it should not be a thing before ??? from by ??? Let him say ??? on ??? Just as Therefore, scripture states: ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Rabbi ??? says ??? the high priest by day ??? he said Rabbi two ??? In the matter one ??? of the high priest No. this he ??? of a priest ??? And furthermore, garments ??? of them "Kedushah" is stricter ??? of them "Kedushah" lightweight except Just as Therefore, scripture states: ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.