It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מא,א גמרא

??? with whom does it agree? Rabbi Yehudah ??? It was taught by ??? makes A sin-offering And there is no meaning to the word the Name makes A sin-offering Perhaps, ??? for he said: ??? is not essential ??? Rav Chisdah said yes. ??? except or ??? or ??? a priest Rav said ??? son of ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rav Chisda As it is written (Lev. 12) ??? (Lev. 15) One who acts or ??? or ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? A sin-offering ??? makes A sin-offering And there is no meaning to the word the Name makes A sin-offering that it is possible Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as in a place that did not have ??? the Name a place ??? is it not logical ??? the Name Scripture states: ??? A sin-offering ??? makes A sin-offering And there is no meaning to the word the Name makes A sin-offering Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? Is this not ??? She And we have learned that he established Rabba said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Just as in a place that did not have ??? and even in the hour of ??? and even in the hour of ??? the Name in the hour of ??? or in the hour ??? a place ??? that did not have in the hour of ??? or in the case that one is not in the hour of ??? is it not logical ??? the Name in the hour of ??? or in the hour ??? Scripture states: ??? A sin-offering ??? makes A sin-offering And there is no meaning to the word the Name makes A sin-offering Come and hear: become tamei make kiddush. Responded ??? coins ??? and after this he said these ??? and these ??? and sends ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? and sends ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? Is this not ??? She And we have learned that he established Rav Sheshet said ??? For didn't R' Elazar say he said R' ??? become tamei make kiddush. ??? sacrifice Responded He has not fulfilled his obligation. And because of the fact that is not he has fulfilled his obligation in what way does fixed Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you to say immediately he said ??? So, here, immediately he said ??? the parasha (scriptural section) to R' ??? R' Yoshaia said: for he said: he has fulfilled his obligation

דף מא,ב גמרא

What is there to say? No. you say and after this he said except I would say and after this ??? and he said ??? and sends ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him Hey, isn't it the case that yes. redemption ??? Rav Pappa said: For example, ??? One If it was an elevation-offering ??? and sends ??? and that one an elevation-offering ??? If it was A sin-offering ??? yes. ??? and sends ??? and that one A sin-offering ??? Back to the main body of the text: R' Elazar said Thus said Rabbi ??? become tamei make kiddush. ??? sacrifice Responded He has not fulfilled his obligation. And Rabbi ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? he has fulfilled his obligation They challenged him from this teaching: one suffering from tzara'at Responded ??? sacrifice ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? sacrifice Responded He has not fulfilled his obligation. It is different there in that case As it is written (Lev. 14) this If so, But the beginning of the teaching, also this one Rabbi the Merciful One ??? For it was taught: ??? one suffering from tzara'at Responded ??? sacrifice ??? It is possible even ??? sacrifice Responded Scripture states: this and let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? the Merciful One and if ??? he

דף מא,ב משנה

??? of ??? on top of lit. on the head of a male goat ??? opposite the house of ??? opposite the house of ??? he came next to ??? the second and "two is a support his hands upon it ??? thus in the same way would say I the Name ??? before you I my house. and the sons of ??? with ??? I the Name ??? please, ??? before you I my house. and the sons of ??? with ??? Moses Your servant (Lev. 16) For by day ??? to declare tahor you from all ??? before Hashem ??? there are. they answer after him: Blessed be in that place honor ??? In reality lit: In the world and until

דף מא,ב גמרא

They posed this difficulty: ??? he arises or ??? he arises Come and hear: For Rav learned: Joseph ??? of ??? on top of lit. on the head of a male goat ??? opposite the house of ??? opposite the house of ??? that did not have ??? this to that and not ??? with others If you say, This is satisfactory ??? he arises then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, ??? he arises ??? No. ??? That this ??? of him. and that one No. ??? of him. ??? Regardless, ??? except Is this not Learn from this ??? he arises Learn from this R' Yitzchak said two tongues I hear One of a cow and one of a male goat ??? One it requires the measure and one It is not it requires the measure and not ??? Which ??? Rav Yosef said ??? We of a male goat ??? who seeks ??? he is required the measure and of a cow that is not he is required ??? it does not require the measure He disagreed with this pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? also he is required ??? Raba said to him ??? She ??? it does not require ??? Abaye How so? he makes ??? I would say ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Rav said wood ??? and a second person ??? is valid They challenged him from this teaching: ??? sends ??? after and make kiddush. Abayye said: There is no difficulty לא קשיא here, ??? here, ??? Raba says ??? She as it is taught: For what reason ??? so that ??? all of them ??? One these are the words of Rabbi Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon says so that that it should be of them ??? When Rav Dimi came that R' Yochanan said three tongues I hear One of a cow and one of a male goat ??? and one of one suffering from tzara'at One ??? ten zuz and one ??? two ??? and one ??? And there is no meaning to the word for me ??? For he came ??? in the name of Rabbi ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.