It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ה,א גמרא

Rav Yosef said ??? There is this difference between them: ??? all the scripture of them is essential. of them ??? a thing that do not is essential. ??? yes. is essential. of them ??? is not essential ??? What is our source for this claim that is not ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 1) ??? And so ??? Is it not the case that yes. atonement except with blood as it is said (Lev. 17) For the blood he ??? for just as Scripture states: ??? it was made ??? the remnants i.e., leftovers of a commandment ??? upon it the scripture it is as if No. ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he said ??? There is this difference between them: ??? all the scripture of them is essential. of them ??? a thing that do not is essential. ??? yes. is essential. of them is not essential ??? What is our source for this claim that is not ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 14) ??? And so ??? Is it not the case that yes. atonement except with blood as it is said For the blood he ??? for just as Scripture states: ??? it was made ??? the remnants i.e., leftovers of a commandment ??? upon it the scripture it is as if No. ??? Rav Papa said, ??? seven There is this difference between them: ??? all the scripture of them is essential. of them ??? a thing that is not is essential. ??? is not essential. of them is not essential ??? What is our source for this claim that is not ??? It was taught by ??? and not The tanna teaches: they separate Ravina he said ??? seven ??? seven There is this difference between them: ??? all the scripture of them is essential. of them ??? a thing that do not is essential. ??? yes. is essential. of them is not essential ??? What is our source for this claim that is not ??? as it is taught: (Ex. 16) ??? who ??? they came and what Watch out for leading vav "And he filled ??? under his father Just as Therefore, scripture states: on account of as it is said (Ex. 29) seven days ??? beneath it ??? yes. for me except ??? seven ??? seven ??? seven ??? one day ??? one day ??? seven ??? Therefore, scripture states: who ??? that specific and what Watch out for leading vav "And he filled ??? In any case, ??? seven initially ??? seven initially What is our source for this claim If you wish, I would say ??? he read ??? And if you wish, I would say For scripture said: (Ex. 29) ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use who ??? to his children after him: ??? at them." ??? with them." ??? Just as ??? seven Even ??? seven What is the reason? ??? all the scripture of them is essential. Rabbi Yitzchak said son of ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 29) and You did ??? and to his children ??? he this accounts all

דף ה,ב גמרא

the validity ??? the validity that is not ??? What is our source for this claim Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said he learns it he opens he opens Rav ??? he said (Lev. 8) ??? ??? Hashem ??? Rav Ashi said: (Lev. 8) For thus ??? The Rabbis taught For thus ??? (Lev. 10) as it was ??? as it was ??? Hashem For thus ??? as it was ??? in the hour of It once happened He said to them: as it was ??? Hashem and not ??? I says R' Yosi said son of ??? yes. ??? For as it says: (Ex. 29) and this ??? who shall you do to them ??? "You ??? This is satisfactory ??? are written ??? except ??? What is our source for this claim We come to compare this this (Lev. 6) ??? sacrifice "... Aharon and his sons who ??? to Hashem ??? that R' Yochanan said It is because of this: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? the written Torah parasha (scriptural section) is essential. Scripture states: (Lev. 8) and he said Moses to ??? this ??? who ??? Hashem even ??? is essential. How so? ??? How so? ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? it was. except How so? ??? in the future to come in the future to come also ??? "... Aharon and his sons Moses with them except How so? ??? They disagreed about this, My son, R' Chiyya and Rabbi Yochanan One says ??? and after this his children and one says "... Aharon and his sons "At the same time," Abayye said: ??? the whole world does not disagree ??? and after this his children ??? or whether ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? The one who said ??? and after this his children As it is written (Lev. 8) ??? that specific ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had it is written ??? and the one who said "... Aharon and his sons "At the same time," As it is written (Ex. 29) ??? "You and for one for he said: "... Aharon and his sons "At the same time," it is written ??? that specific ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had it is written ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.