It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סד,א גמרא

Rava said: For example, that he was to him an ill person in the midst of his house ??? of its mother by day ??? And so This ??? who ??? (Lev. 22) No. ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says Hey, isn't it the case that Is this not ??? She this one In the west, they said ??? This is ??? if of in that place did he die this that upon it ascended ??? Rav said two ??? two ??? two ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: two ??? two ??? two ??? in what way ??? Rav reasoned ??? life, are not ??? and Rabbi Yochanan reasoned ??? life, ??? What is the reason of Rav? ??? time ??? time Is it not the case that this is so even though ??? No. Look, For he returns ??? it is of acceptable worth. Here in this case, also, there is no difference who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna No. ??? A general principle: Here in this case, ??? except we were The reason is of Rav ??? transgresses the master of ??? transgresses Is it not the case that this is so even though that is not Look, now For he returns ??? it is of acceptable worth. Here in this case, also, there is no difference and there in that case What is our source for this claim As it is written (Lev. 22) For ??? at them." ??? with them." ??? with them." he that is not ??? this one he crossed ??? and R' Yochanan ??? the Merciful One at them." are these he and so when he crossed ??? this one all ??? Because ??? Rav This certain individual at them." ??? he that is not ??? this one by way of lit., through the hands of ??? ??? Rabbi Eliezer says if was sacrificed ??? of one from them ??? all ??? all of them ??? of one from them ??? all ??? all of them but the sages say even ??? all of them except ??? from them he has fulfilled his obligation ??? And the other one ??? for him ??? at them." And the other one with them." at them." No. he expounds. and for Rav, ??? also ??? life, are not ??? If it was he is required This ??? If it was he is required This ??? Rabba said: Rav derive it like Rabbi Yosi for he said: a commandment ??? Which Rabbi Yosei If you were to say Rabbi Yosei ??? For it was taught in a baraita three ??? of three three ??? regarding them ??? ??? and It is written about them ??? the house of ??? and it was taught: he said Rabbi Yosei For what reason It is written about them ??? the house of ??? whichever from them ??? perhaps, It is different there in that case ??? the first No. ??? the final one -- except Rabbi Yosei ??? after beneath it and after this Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found ??? Consider this case: ??? they stand whichever from them ??? these are the words of the sages Rabbi Yosei says: a commandment ???

דף סד,ב גמרא

and if he was the second ??? from him ??? Rabba said: ??? Our mishna ??? of Rav ??? of R' Yochanan Our mishna ??? of Rav where he teaches if of in that place did he die this that upon it ascended ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? beneath it And the other one ??? he arises ??? of R' Yochanan where he teaches two Really? know if two ??? if two ??? two For as it says: he raised up ??? and not ??? did he die What is to be heard to support this reading? he raised up ??? and not immediately he stood We have learnt in a Mishna: And furthermore, Rabbi Yehuda said ??? the blood ??? did he die ??? the blood This is satisfactory to Rabbi Yochanan for he said: ??? life, ??? It is because of this: thus ??? except for Rav, for he said: ??? life, are not ??? why is it that ??? Rav would say to you who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah No. That is what I thought to say For I thought to say who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis This is satisfactory for Rav, In this case, ??? Rabbi Yehudah And the rabbbis except to R' Yochanan in what way ??? Rabba said: this one say ??? of Rav We have learnt in a Mishna: that do not A sin-offering community ??? this one for an individual For This ??? This is satisfactory to Rabbi Yochanan ??? Abba Rav said for he said: Rabbi Abba Rav said

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.