It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פא,א גמרא

??? of terumah must make restitution ??? and does not must make restitution ??? (Lev. 22) For shall eat creates an exclusion to the one causing damage Rav said ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? of terumah ??? after ??? must make restitution ??? the principal amount plus a fifth two yes. must make restitution except he is equivalent. pieces of wood ??? One who eats and the drinking of yes. ??? Which Tanna taught: Rav Chisdah said ??? and R' Yehoshua She For it was taught in a baraita A general principle: R' Yehoshua said: all ??? the value of ??? and not ??? and not ??? No. ??? and not ??? yes. combine together Rav ??? he said even you say rabbis Up to this point, No. ??? They said: rabbis there i.e., in another mishna except in the matter of ??? one She But here, in this case, It is because of this: ??? he and that one No. ??? and thus he said Reish Lakish: ??? and Rabbi Yehoshua She For it was taught in a baraita A general principle: R' Yehoshua said: etc. And Rabbi Yochanan said: even you say rabbis Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis there i.e., in another mishna except in the matter of ??? But here, in this case, It is because of this: ??? he and that one No. ???

דף פא,א משנה

he ate ??? one he is not liable except A sin-offering One he ate One who acts work he is liable ??? sin-offerings he ate they eat those that are not ??? as regard to eating, ??? those that are not ??? brine or ??? is exempt

דף פא,א גמרא

he said Reish Lakish: On account of what No. ??? It is because of this: where it is not possible in what way does ??? the Merciful One does not eat food in the amount like an olive ??? the Merciful One No. ??? to arise ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? the Merciful One ??? No. ??? If so, souls them ??? He disagreed with this Rav Bibi son of Abaye ??? the Merciful One ??? If so, ??? Is this not ??? One who acts He disagreed with this Rav Ashi ??? to ??? from ??? it is a problem and it was taught ??? to it from here (Num. 29) ??? ??? and all work No. ??? It is possible ??? on ??? work Scripture states: (Lev. 23) and all ??? who shall you do all work ??? the day ??? on ??? of day ??? he is spiritually cut off and does not ??? he is spiritually cut off on ??? work It is possible No. ??? he is spiritually cut off on ??? work but: ??? he is spiritually cut off on ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 23) For all ??? who No. ??? the day ??? on ??? of day ??? he is spiritually cut off and does not ??? he is spiritually cut off on ??? It is possible No. ??? are in the general category ??? but: ??? on ??? work Scripture states: (Lev. 23) and all work No. ??? the day ??? on ??? of day he ??? and does not ??? on ??? work It is possible No. ??? on ??? work but: ??? on ??? It would be a logical inference for just as work ??? and Festivals he does not ??? upon it ??? that is not accustomed ??? is it not logical that it should not be ??? upon it but: ??? of day himself No. we have learned ??? he does not say ??? for just as ??? that is not accustomed ??? he is spiritually cut off work ??? and Festivals is it not all the more so? why is it said ??? from him ??? the value of it is said ??? and it is said ??? Just as work No. ??? But rather, if so, ??? Even ??? No. ??? But rather, if so, ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? that did not have ??? shall you say ??? except he does not say ??? Just as work ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? that did not have ??? is it not all the more so? why is it said ??? from it ??? the value of it is said ??? and it is said ??? Just as work ??? Even ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? and Festivals shall you say ??? that is not accustomed ??? and Festivals Ravina said This a Tanna taught: ??? For if it was No. ??? that it is possible ??? five ??? are written ??? one ??? of the day and one ??? of the night and one ??? of the day and one ??? of the night and one ??? between of the day between of the night of the academy of R' Yishmael a Tanna taught: it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there No. ??? But rather, if so, ??? Even here, No. ??? unless it is ??? Rav Acha son of Ya'akov he said he learns it Sabbath ??? creation Just as there No. ??? But rather, if so, ??? Even here, No. ??? But rather, if so, ??? Rav Papa said,

דף פא,ב גמרא

he ??? Sabbath ??? As it is written ??? This is satisfactory Rav ??? did not say ??? son of Ya'akov ??? As it is written ??? is preferable except Rav Acha son of Ya'akov What is the reason? did not say ??? should bring himself to account for that which was taught (Lev. 23) ??? ??? It is possible ??? Scripture states: in the evening, If it was in the evening, It is possible ??? Scripture states: ??? How so? ??? while it is still day from here ??? on ??? And there is no meaning to the word for me except when he entered when he went out from it from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 23) est until evening And there is no meaning to the word for me except Yom Kippur. ??? Scripture states: ??? yes. for me except ??? that are good ??? days ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 23) ??? How so? in all places as it is said the captivity of ??? on ??? and it was taught ??? This ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself ??? Chiyya son of Rav ??? for it teaches: Chiyya son of Rav ??? ??? And so ??? Is it not the case that ??? except to say to you all One who eats and drink ??? upon it the scripture it is as if ??? he ate they eat that do not ??? Rabba said: ??? is exempt ??? is exempt They challenged him from this teaching: he was Rabbi Meir says: ??? as it is said (Lev. 19) ??? ??? Really? know ??? ways of eating he except Just as Therefore, scripture states: wood ways of eating wood ??? the value of you shall says this ??? they are obligated ??? And there is no meaning to the word the Land of Israel ??? anything as it is said (Deut. 8) No. ??? all of it There is no difficulty לא קשיא this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? He said to him Ravina ??? For didn't Rav say ??? This ??? and we bless upon it "who creates the fruit of the earth" There is no difficulty. this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? The Rabbis taught he ate by the reeds is exempt the stalks of vines he is liable These are the stalks of vines Rabbi Yitzchak said ??? all ??? and until Yom Kippur. and Rav Kahana he said all thirty day This teaching is consistent with the position For R' Isaac ??? he ate by the reeds is exempt and the stalks of vines he is liable These are the stalks of vines all ??? and until ??? brine or ??? this one vinegar he is liable ??? with whom does it agree? Rabbi She as it is taught: R' says vinegar he responds ??? Rav ??? son of ??? That is not the halacha like Rabbi ??? the whole world they mix ??? the vinegar "Hear!" Rav ??? he said I will say that they said I once it has been done initially who They said: I will say that they said I ??? who They said: I will say that they said I ??? who They said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.