It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יא,א גמרא

the house of also despite the fact that do not that is high ten immediately ??? he that is not ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And there are those who say it was Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said is permitted. ??? in a sukkah on account of that it does not have a roof despite the fact ??? ten They challenged him from this teaching: one who sleeps ??? in a sukkah he has not fulfilled his obligation. Lit., he has not caused his obligation to go out from his hands. Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? to it a roof Come and hear: ??? two ??? four one spreads out atop ??? is invalid atop ??? is valid but only that it shall not be ??? from the mattress ten handbreadths this one ??? from the mattress ten is invalid despite the fact that it does not have a roof that I ??? If it was ??? to join with the body of ??? No. ??? to join with the body of ??? Rabbah the son of Rav Huna is permitted. ??? despite the fact in which there is to it a roof despite the fact ??? ten like who like R' Yehudah for he said: No. will come ??? casual nullify ??? fixed For it was taught in a baraita R' Yehudah said: We were accustomed we were ??? under the mattress before the elders and let us say, "The halacha is like Rabbi Yehudah If it was he said "The halacha is like Rabbi Yehudah then I might incorrectly say: What case is he dealing with? a bed ??? but: ??? I would say No. Come and learn from this. The reason is of Rabbi Yehudah that is not will come ??? casual nullify ??? fixed there is no difference a bed and there is no difference ???

דף יא,א משנה

??? upon it ??? and ??? and ??? and the thatched roof on ??? is invalid and if he was thatched roof in great quantity from them or ??? is valid This is the general rule: Any thing that was he accepts ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? from the land yes. ??? in it and any thing thing that is not he accepts ??? from the land ??? therein.

דף יא,א גמרא

??? Rav Yosef in front For Rav Huna ??? and he said or ??? is valid And Rav says It is necessary for him ??? He said to him: Rav Huna this one Shmuel he said ??? Rav Yosef ??? He said to him: because who ??? to you that is not he said Shmuel he said Rav and he said Watch out for leading vav And Shmuel said for him Rav Huna thus ??? to you of Shmuel he said and not Rav of Rav ??? This is like of Rav ??? the Chasid: ??? and not ??? threads that are theirs he came in front of Rav Chiyya son of ??? He said to him: Thus said Rav ??? there are. are proper Perhaps, ??? This is ??? Here in this case, also, ??? This is ??? reasoned Shmuel we do not say ??? This is ??? Hey, isn't it the case that It was taught by Shmuel It is because of this: R' Chiyya ??? for two corners "At the same time," and after this ??? threads that are theirs are proper Is this not ??? and after this he interrupts No. ??? and after this tying he interrupts and after this tying what is there to say? What would you have said?

דף יא,ב גמרא

in the case of ??? in the hour of a thread" there is not in this case. Come and learn from this. They challenged him from this teaching: ??? and not ??? threads that are theirs ??? Is this not ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? of Rav Rav would say to you What then does it mean when it says ??? until ??? And Shmuel said ??? In reality lit: In the world and thus he said Levi ??? In reality lit: In the world and thus Rav said gifts Shmuel said ??? In reality lit: In the world that it is possible that they said Rav said gifts ??? it was. ??? in front ??? Shmuel And he said to me ??? In reality lit: In the world They challenged him from this teaching: ??? and after this ??? threads that are theirs ??? And furthermore, It was taught: regarding a sukkah (in Deut. 16) shall you do and not from ??? from here ??? said upon it ??? and ??? and ??? and the thatched roof on ??? is invalid How so? Shall I say ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of It is because of this: shall you do and not from ??? Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him ??? except ??? And we have learned is invalid so learn from this that is not say ??? This is ??? of Rav Rav would say to you Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? that is not ??? from all a place ??? and after this ??? It is a difficulty for Rav's position. it is a problem Let us say, ??? he crossed ??? is invalid, these are the words of Rabbi Shimon son of ??? and the sages validate it ??? A lulav It is necessary for him ??? A lulav ??? As it is written regarding a sukkah shall you do and not from ??? Is this not In this case, ??? reasoned say regarding a sukkah ??? This is ??? and regarding A lulav also say ??? This is ??? and one ??? reasoned we do not say regarding a sukkah ??? This is ??? and regarding A lulav also we do not say ??? This is ??? No. ??? we do not say regarding a sukkah ??? This is ??? and here in this other case, ??? A lulav ??? what they disagree about one ??? reasoned No. ??? A lulav ??? and one ??? reasoned ??? A lulav ??? And if you wish, I could say If it was ??? to us ??? It is necessary for him ??? the whole world does not disagree ??? A lulav ??? and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about one master reasons that It is necessary for him ??? and one master reasons that it is not necessary ??? as it is taught: A lulav between ??? between that is not ??? is valid R' Yehuda says: ??? is valid that is not ??? is invalid, What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rabbi Yehudah he learns it ??? Watch out for leading vav And it is written there (Ex. 12) ??? and It is written here (Lev. 23) ??? to you by day ??? Just as there ??? Even here, also ??? And the rabbbis ??? No. ??? like who ??? this one that teaches A lulav a commandment ??? and if No. ??? is valid If it was R' Yehudah For No. ??? why is it that is valid If it was rabbis why is it that a commandment In reality lit: In the world It is the rabbis' position but on account of as it is said (Ex. 15) this to me ??? before him ??? This is the general rule: any thing ??? Raysh Lakish said Scripture states: (Gen. 2) ??? he shall ascend from the land Just as ??? a thing that is not he accepts ??? from the land Even a sukkah a thing that do not he accepts ??? from the land This is satistfactory ??? Answer me honor they were except ??? actually and really they make to them What is there to say? as it is taught: (Lev. 23) For ??? the Children of Israel Answer me honor they were --- these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer. Rabbi Akiva says: ??? actually and really they make to them This is satistfactory ??? except Rabbi Akivah What is there to say? When Rav Dimi came that R' Yochanan said Scripture states: (in Deut. 16) the Holiday of Sukkot ??? shall you do to you There is an analogy between a sukkah ??? Just as ??? a thing that is not he accepts ??? from the land Even a sukkah a thing that is not he accepts ??? from the land

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.