It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יג,א גמרא

??? them he departs Rav said ??? son of Raba Behold! ??? in them? Abaye said ??? No. ??? What is the reason? immediately ??? to it he departs Rav Gidel said that Rav said This ??? in them? even though ??? heaven No. ??? even though ??? them ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. No. ??? Rav Chisdah said Ravina said son of ??? Behold! ??? in them? even though ??? heaven No. ??? even though ??? them ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. No. ??? Another teaching is like this: reeds ??? of them reeds This is obvious! I would say reeds of ??? of them and Rav Chisdah said Ravina said son of ??? Behold! ??? a person he would exit of them the hands of ??? on Passover ??? and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? in words of and not ??? and not ??? in which there is to him in that place ??? Abayye said: all ??? was his name before the giving of Torah ??? Torah ??? upon it in his knowledge in which there is to him in that place ??? and Behold! No. ??? before the giving of Torah A general principle: Rava said: Behold! ??? and that one ??? them ??? It is because of this: ??? Rav Chisdah said ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. No. ??? three ??? two It is a disagreement R' Yosi And the rabbbis For it was taught in a baraita the commandments ??? three ??? of them three ??? Rabbi Yosei says: the commandments ??? three ??? two ??? Any thing that was It might come to erroneously enter your mind that: ??? two ??? also two and This case where he teaches three ??? and from that of Rabbi ??? three ??? According to the sages, three ??? For it was taught: R' Yosei says ??? two ??? one is invalid, and does not is valid until that it should be ??? three ??? two ??? to R' ??? three ??? According to the sages, three ??? For it was taught: ??? two ??? one is valid and does not is invalid, until that it should be ??? one ??? one is invalid, this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? one is valid

דף יג,ב גמרא

except I would say until that it should be ??? one ??? Behold! ??? in them? even though ??? in reality he ??? Thus said Rabbi Abba Behold! ??? immediately ??? that are theirs are proper Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Rav Pappa said: who permits them ??? Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua even you say that is not Sarai them all ??? that is not ??? No. ??? Thus said Rabbi Abba Shmuel said vegetables where they said the sages a person he would exit of them the hands of ??? on Passover bring in ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? before ??? and invalidate it in a sukkah It is because of this: ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא immediately ??? like who ??? he is equivalent. and he said Rabbi Abba Rav Huna said ??? he (??? ) does not have Rav ??? son of ??? Rav Huna said the reaping ??? he (??? ) does not have The one who said reaping all the more so ??? that is not it's settled. for him that is not ??? The one who said ??? that do not to him ??? but: reaping he has ??? for him ??? in them? so that thus it will be that is not ??? Let him say of Rav ??? son of ??? She as it is taught: ??? figs of them figs ??? of them grapes ??? of them ??? of them ??? all of them if ??? is greater than on ??? is valid And if not, is invalid others say until ??? on ??? and on ??? Is this not In this case, ??? reasoned there is regarding them ??? and one master reasons that Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? to Rabbi Abba certainly ??? She for Rav, ??? son of ??? Who would say ??? She Rav would say to you ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world reason that the reaping ??? he (??? ) does not have and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? as regard to eating, but he had second thoughts about them to the thatched roof If it was ??? as regard to eating, What is the reasoning is a law established by the Rabbis And if you say They reason rabbis immediately ??? about them to the thatched roof nullification for him ??? and who nullification for him ??? For it was taught in a mishna: all the vessels

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.