It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יד,א גמרא

??? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? And there is no meaning to the word we go up ??? except ??? It once happened It once happened sent forth immediately It once happened immediately ??? It is not ??? No. immediately It once happened and not immediately ??? And if you say What case is he dealing with? vessels ??? but: ??? food ??? was it made? ??? For it was taught in a mishna: all ??? ??? This is satisfactory for one for he said: ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except for one for he said: What then does it mean when it says ??? actually and really What is there to say? Here in this case, also, ??? actually and really If so, What is the reasoning ??? like Rabbi Yosi For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Yosei become tamei This What then does it mean when it says This is satisfactory there i.e., in another mishna The reason is of R' Yosi ??? Shimon ben Lakish (Resh Lakish) for he said: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? Because ??? except Here in this case, for what ??? them ??? Back to the main body of the text: all ??? and Rabbi Yosei, become tamei What then does it mean when it says ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? actually and really R' ??? some texts: Elazar says ??? This is satisfactory to Rabbi ??? some texts: Elazar for he said: ??? we were ??? Rabbi Yosei except to Rabbi Yochanan for he said: ??? actually and really why is it that become tamei Rabbi Yosei R' Shimon ben Lakish (Resh Lakish) said Because ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? some texts: Elazar For what reason ??? of righteous ??? to say to you Just as ??? this ??? ??? from one place to another place Even ??? of righteous ??? of the Holy One, Who is Blessed ???

דף יד,א משנה

??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. and Rabbi Meir ??? he gave upon it ??? that he was ??? four handbreadths is valid but only that did not have ??? beneath it

דף יד,א גמרא

Rav said It is a disagreement ??? in which there is of them four of Rabbi ??? it has ??? And Rabbi Yehudah he does not have ??? but: ??? that do not have in them four the words of all are is valid And Shmuel said ??? of them four It is a disagreement but: there are of them four the words of all are is invalid They do not have four And even if less than three this one reeds in reality ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: there are of them four the words of all are is invalid less than three the words of all are is valid What is the reason מאי טעמא reeds in reality ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: from three until four one master reasons that immediately ??? the measure a place No. ??? and one master reasons that immediately ??? them ??? "lavud" ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: he gave upon it ??? that he was ??? four handbreadths is valid but only that did not have ??? beneath it This is satisfactory ??? for he said: ??? of them four It is a disagreement but: there are of them four the words of all are is invalid It is because of this: thus No. ??? beneath it except for Rav, for he said: ??? of them four It is a disagreement but: They do not have four the words of all are is valid according to R' Yehudah why is it that No. ??? beneath it Who deduces the words of all are She at the end of the teaching, ??? to Rabbi Meir Come and hear: two ??? combine together

דף יד,ב גמרא

two ??? yes. combine together R' Meir says Even ??? This is satisfactory ??? for he said: ??? of them four It is a disagreement but: there are of them four the words of all are is invalid What then does it mean when it says combine together combine together ??? except for Rav, for he said: ??? of them four It is a disagreement but: They do not have four the words of all are is valid How so? How should we understand this? If it was for there is in them? four For what reason them ??? If it was ??? in them? four why is it that Hey, isn't it the case that reeds in reality ??? In reality lit: In the world for there is in them? four And what does it mean when it says combine together combine together ??? cubits from the trapping of ??? other than this This is satisfactory ??? for he said: ??? of them four It is a disagreement but: there are of them four the words of all are is invalid What then does it mean when it says combine together combine together ??? cubits from the trapping of except for Rav, This is satisfactory to R' ??? What then does it mean when it says combine together combine together ??? cubits from the trapping of except according to R' Yehudah for he said: even there are of them four is valid What then does it mean when it says yes. combine together reeds in reality ??? for he says R' Meir combine together Rabbi Yehuda said yes. combine together This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav This teaching is consistent with the position of Shmuel This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav ??? of ??? that do not have in them four the words of all are is valid there are of them four Rabbi Meir invalidates it And Rabbi Yehudah considers it proper R' Yehudah said: It once happened in the hour of ??? that were of them four ??? atop ??? They said to him: From here is there really proof? yes. ??? proof This teaching is consistent with the position of Shmuel ??? of ??? in which there is of them four the words of all are is invalid They do not have four R' Meir invalidates it And Rabbi Yehudah considers it proper give thanks Rabbi Meir ??? there are between ??? among them and is valid give thanks Rabbi Yehudah ??? he gave upon it ??? that he was ??? four handbreadths is valid And there is no meaning to the word they sleep beneath it and one who sleeps beneath it he has not fulfilled his obligation. Lit., he has not caused his obligation to go out from his hands. was it said; ??? on ??? Rav Huna he said is invalid and Rav Chisda and Rabbah the son of Rav Huna They said: is valid ??? Rav ??? the yoke of ??? Rav Chisda and Rabbah the son of Rav Huna they said to him ??? on ??? What then? He said to them is invalid ??? of ??? He said to them Rav Huna they do not say Let them go They said: ??? And they said to him And who said it? to us Master, The reason is and not ??? of him He said to them and who ??? The reason is and they do not say Let them go Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: It is not ??? so that his head and the majority of his body and his table or ??? of it ??? so that ??? of it ??? the tip of or ??? upon it ??? that he was ??? four handbreadths despite the fact that did not have He brought in to its midst except three handbreadths is invalid How so? ??? Is this not For example, ??? on ??? No. Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? three ??? one for there to be wheat that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? that is coming out from the sukkah and all ??? that is coming out from the sukkah it is judged ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.