Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף טו,א משנה
??? that do not upon it ??? R' Yehuda says: The academy of Shammai say: ??? take One ??? but the academy of Hillel say: ??? or take One ??? Rabbi Meir says: take One ??? and does not ???
דף טו,א גמרא
This is satisfactory The academy of Hillel their reason It is because of this: shall you do and not from ??? If it was ??? does he act? for him It once happened If it was take One ??? a slave of it It once happened except the academy of Shammai What is the reasoning If it was It is because of this: shall you do and not from ??? If it was It is because of this: ??? One ??? In reality lit: In the world It is because of this: ??? So, too, here, ??? even though ??? If it was take One ??? yes. If it was No. No. If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, R' Meir says take One ??? but not ??? Rabbi Meir we were the academy of Shammai thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? the academy of Shammai And the academy of Hillel In the matter this And what can we come and learn from this? of Rabbi Meir it has ??? and Rabbi Yehudah he does not have ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? of it one ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah and Rabbi Meir ??? Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said But the beginning of the teaching, ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) but on account of ??? vessels ??? of it ??? Rav said for he said: ??? is valid ??? is invalid and not ??? because ??? Here in this case, also, No. ??? because vessels except on ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, ??? times Why do I need at the end of the teaching, R' Yehudah ??? that he came He said to him: to Rabbi Meir why is it that ??? It is because of this: ??? This reason out the logic. ??? he for there is them and the academy of Hillel No. ??? and he said Rabbi Meir No. ??? the academy of Shammai And the academy of Hillel In the matter this This is satistfactory for Rav, for he said: It is a disagreement ??? of them four For R' ??? it has ??? And Rabbi Yehudah he does not have ??? except ??? for he said: ??? of them four It is a disagreement but: there are of them four the words of all are is invalid at the end of the teaching, in what way ??? one master reasons that nullification ??? and one master reasons that ??? No. nullification
דף טו,א משנה
??? his sukkah ??? or ??? the mattress if there are a resting place ??? is valid ??? to do to him a sukkah It is not a sukkah
דף טו,א גמרא
Let us say, ??? For Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua ??? Rav Papa said, is permitted. and Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua he said is forbidden Rav would say to you ??? the son of of Rav Joshua What then does it mean when it says ??? and he goes out
דף טו,ב גמרא
Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Rav Ami said ??? Rava said: even you say ??? if they were ??? two ??? evening evening ??? or ??? Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: to R' Ami son of ??? for he said: Rabbi Ami son of ??? vessels is invalid Like that which was said by R' ??? he said Rabbi ??? and two ??? and two ??? So, here, ??? and two ??? and two ??? in a case it was said: For R' ??? he said Rabbi to this other teaching For it was taught in a baraita
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.