It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לב,א גמרא

??? is invalid, ??? is invalid, ??? to freedom is valid Rav Pappa said: that He performs ??? Rabba said: They did not say that except in a case before him but: after it ??? he Rav Nachman said to the side ??? he is equivalent. And there are those who say it was ??? he is equivalent. Rabba said: This ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? the master of ??? he ??? upon it ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? that He performs For ??? he is required Rav ??? What then? Come and hear: for he said: ??? he said R' Yehoshua son of Levi ??? is invalid, Is this not it is the law ??? No. ??? that I for it is the case that lacking for him that it is possible that they said he said ??? he said Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi ??? was it made? ??? R' Yehudah ??? It was taught: R' Yehuda says: It is because of this: R' Tarfon (Lev. 23) ??? if he was ??? Ravina said to Rav Ashi: Watch out for leading vav And from where do you have it that ??? he I would say ??? there is not in this case. and so go ahead and say ??? from this general principle it would follow That there are ??? and that one ??? In reality lit: In the world and so go ahead and say ??? Abayye said: (Prov. 3) ??? and all ??? peace it is written He said to him: Raba ??? and so go ahead and say both my hands For dates ??? it is written and so go ahead and say one to this some ??? a seminal emission ??? a mountain ??? Abayye said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? of this ??? of this but: yes. his head of this ??? of this is invalid, Another teaching is like this: ??? a mountain ??? is invalid Hey, isn't it the case that We We have learnt in a Mishna: is valid except Learn from this ??? Learn from this

דף לב,ב גמרא

and there are ??? for him ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? a mountain ??? is valid For it was taught: is invalid Abayye said: There is no difficulty. here, ??? of this ??? of this here, that do not his head of this ??? of this he said Rabbi ??? he said R' Yehoshua son of Levi And there are those who say it was It was taught by Rabbah son of ??? It is because of this: Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai two ??? there are ??? son of ??? and ascend ??? that we have learned ??? a mountain ??? and this is ??? of ??? A lulav in which there is in it three ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said the measure Myrtle and Willow three A lulav four so that that it should be A lulav he would exit from ??? And Rabbi ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: the spine of A lulav It is necessary for him that went out from ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: A lulav in which there is in it three handbreadths so that ??? in it is valid I would say and jars of ??? in it is valid Master, ??? for him Master, ??? for him Come and hear: the measure Myrtle and Willow three A lulav four Is this not ??? No. ??? elevate Back to the main body of the text: the measure Myrtle and Willow three A lulav four R' Tarfon says ??? the daughter of five handbreadths Rabba said: ??? for him Master to R' ??? now ??? three No. ??? the daughter of five -- why must that case be taught as well? When Rav Dimi came he said cubits the daughter of Six handbreadths One who acts it the daughter of five "Go!" from them three ??? how much are they, them three three ??? it is a problem of Shmuel ??? Here in this case, Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said the measure Myrtle and Willow three and there in that case Rav Huna said Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi ??? No. ??? I will say ??? No. ??? who say No. ??? For he came ??? he said cubits the daughter of five handbreadths One who acts it Six "Go!" from them three ??? how much you shall them two and a fraction the end of the end of it is a problem of Shmuel ??? No. ??? And this is like the position ??? No. ??? For Rav Huna said: Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi ???

דף לב,ב משנה

Myrtle that is stolen ??? is invalid, of Asherah and of a city ??? is invalid, ??? his head ??? about it or that were ??? is invalid, and if ??? is valid And there is no meaning to the word ??? on Yom Tov

דף לב,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: (Lev. 23) ??? wood ??? ??? and if this he you shall says this Myrtle and so go ahead and say ??? in the case of ??? there is not in this case. and so go ahead and say ??? in the case of ??? ??? there is not in this case. and so go ahead and say ??? Abayye said: (Prov. 3) ??? there is not in this case. Rava said: from here (Zech. 8) ??? The rabbis taught: ??? Myrtle Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov says ??? wood ??? wood ??? the value of you shall says this Myrtle a Tanna taught: wood ??? is valid but when it is not ??? is invalid, How so? ??? Rav Yehudah said This is only in the case ??? three three ??? Rav Kahana he said even two and one Rav Acha the son of of Raba he turned ??? and one Because he departs ??? of Rav ??? He said to him: Master, son of Ameimar to Rav Ashi Abba to this some Myrtle a mute a seminal emission for him The Rabbis taught ??? most of upon it ??? in it ??? is valid but only that it should be ??? standing this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? most of upon it is valid and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had It was taught by but only that it should be ??? standing immediately ??? them two ??? in what way does It concerns itself Abayye said: It concerns itself

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.