It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מא,א גמרא

??? but: ??? the words of all are on ??? on depend yes. ??? lest ??? from them ??? Rav Ashi said It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? two the words of all are between a way a purchase between a way ??? Hey, isn't it the case that where he teaches ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? a Tanna taught: also at the end of the teaching, ??? Ravina to Rav Ashi who in which there is to him a sela coin of ??? in it ??? How so? may he do it? ??? next to ??? a regular opposite him. And it is said: to him give for me ??? fruits he gives to him and he returns i.e., repeats and says to him Behold! fruits ??? to you as a gift and he says to him this one to you a sela coin -- this refers to as a gift ??? the purchaser of them Just as ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? two he And we have learned a way a purchase yes. a way ??? No. except Thus said Rabbi ??? It is a disagreement ??? two but: ??? a way a purchase yes. a way ??? No. Hey, isn't it the case that where he teaches one ??? and one second tithe What then does it mean when it says ??? he is equivalent. ??? For if it was No. you say thus tithe tithe actually and really Hey, isn't it the case that it is written (Deut. 14) ??? into your hand except he is equivalent. tithe Here in this case, also, he is equivalent. ???

דף מא,א משנה

At first, it was the case that lulav was taken in the Holy Temple all seven days of the festival and in the countryside one day But then, from when the Holy House the Temple was destroyed he decreed -- Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai did -- that it should be the case that A lulav is taken in the countryside seven days in memory of the Holy Temple and that it should be a day of ??? all of it forbidden

דף מא,א גמרא

What is our source for this claim ??? in memory of the Holy Temple that R' Yochanan said For scripture said: (Jer. 30) For ??? long to you ??? says Hashem" For ??? they read to you ??? She ??? It does not have ??? It does not have from this general principle it would follow ??? and that it should be day ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא rapidly" ??? the house of ??? and they shall say ??? who No. ??? East now also ??? and they No. ??? There was not the house of ??? East ??? now That there are the house of ??? permits ??? begins ??? Shall I say ??? Behold! ??? East except ??? the day and elsewhere in the scripture ??? for it is the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? are permitted ??? the day and elsewhere in the scripture on account of that do not a court בית דין ??? in it it is not necessary to teach this ??? So, too, close to the setting of the sun said Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he said Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai following the position of R' Yehudah he said for he said: from the Torah he is forbidden As it is written

דף מא,ב גמרא

(Lev. 23) until ??? the day ??? until ??? of day but his thought is until and until are in the general category and who reasoned for him ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? upon it ??? from when the Holy House the Temple was destroyed he decreed Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai that it should be day ??? all of it is forbidden He said to him: Rabbi Yehudah Is it not the case that from the Torah he is forbidden As it is written until ??? the day ??? until ??? of day Rabbi Yehudah he that he came ??? he reasoned According to Rabbinic law, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and not She according to Torah law, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Hey, isn't it the case that he decreed he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: What then does it mean when it says he decreed ??? and he decreed

דף מא,ב משנה

??? of the Holiday of Sukkot that falls to be on Shabbat all the nation ??? ??? to the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue ??? and have come Each and every one ??? are his ??? because of where they said the sages yes. a person he would exit the hands of ??? on Yom Tov ??? of his fellow but the remainder of ??? the Holiday of Sukkot a person he would exit the hands of ??? of his fellow Rabbi Yosei says: the first Yom Tov of the Holiday of Sukkot that falls to be on Shabbat and forgot ??? a lulav to the public thoroughfare is exempt because of ???

דף מא,ב גמרא

From where do we learn this? ??? (Lev. 23) ??? that it should be ??? in the hand of Each and every one to you ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? and that is stolen from here the sages said yes. a person he would exit the hands of ??? on Yom Tov ??? of the Holiday of Sukkot ??? of his fellow But rather, if so, were given to him as a gift And it once happened ??? and Rabbi Yehoshua and Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya and Rabbi Akiva that were have come ??? and not he was A lulav except ??? only. ??? in a case where there are one thousand zuz they brought Rabban Gamliel and went out in it and were given to Rabbi Joshua as a gift they brought Rabbi Yehoshua and went out in it and were given to Rabbi ??? son of ??? as a gift they brought Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya and went out in it and were given as a gift to Rabbi ??? they brought Rabbi Akiva and went out in it ??? why do I have to say ??? ??? Come and hear from this gifts in order to turn her name gifts This is like for he said: Raba this one to you an etrog this in order ??? for me they brought and went out in it ??? he has fulfilled his obligation No. ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. why do I have to say ??? in a case where there are one thousand zuz to make you acknowledge how much the commandments ??? about them He said to him Master, son of Ameimar to Rav Ashi Abba ??? He pray? of him. They challenged him from this teaching: No. ??? a person tefillin in his hand and a Torah scroll ??? and he prayed." and not ??? of them water and not ??? of them No. ??? fixed and not ??? casual and Shmuel said ??? a loaf and coins Behold! these is subject to the same laws as them ??? there i.e., in another mishna Is this not a commandment ??? agitated in them? Here in this case, a commandment ??? and he is not agitated. in them? It was taught: Rabbi Eliezer son of ??? says thus in the same way he was ??? of the men of Jerusalem a person he would exit from his house ??? in his hand walks to the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue ??? in his hand reads the recitation of Shema and he prays ??? in his hand reads in the Torah ??? ??? atop ??? walks to visit ??? in his hand enter to the house of study ??? in the hand of his son in the hand of his male slave in the hand of ??? And what can we come and learn from this? to make you acknowledge how much they were ??? Rabbi Yosei says: ??? Abayye said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.